Evolution of menopause

From Citizendium
Revision as of 17:00, 2 May 2008 by imported>Michaela Emily Howells
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
Attention niels epting.png
Attention niels epting.png
This article is currently being developed as part of an Eduzendium student project. If you are not involved with this project, please refrain from collaboratively developing it until this notice is removed.
Articles that lack this notice, including many Eduzendium ones, welcome your collaboration!



Introduction: The Evolution of Menopause in Human Females

Menopause is the permanent cessation of menstruation due to the loss of ovarian follicular activity [1]. Although the proximal causes of menopause are well understood the evolutionary causes remain unclear. When considered in the mammalian trajectory, menopause is an unusual life history trait. Although there has been some suggestive evidence reported in a few nonhuman primate species (see section 3), only toothed whales and human females are reported as having a true post reproductive life span. The cessation of reproduction seems counter intuitive to natural selection. According to natural selection, animals are expected to maximize their reproductive capabilities. In most instances this means reproducing until time of death. With menopause, human females can live up to fifty years beyond natural reproduction.


Determining the key variables resulting in the evolution of menopause has been challenging for scientists. A main constraint is the lack of fossilization in soft tissues such as reproductive organs. Indirect measures such as hormonal and bone density changes through osteoporosis, require a number of specimens that are not yet available. Most research into the evolution of menopause focuses on the trade offs between continuing reproduction late into life and ceasing reproduction prior to death.


The Evolution of a Post Reproductive Life Span

Genetic factors of aging have been proposed and provide some insight into the aging process. In one experiment, laboratory animals from the same species but with different genomes were exposed to similar environmental pressures and had pronounced differences in their natural lifespans[2]. Natural experiments with human twins support these findings. Monozygotic twins lifespans were found to be statistically closer to one another’s than those of dizygotic twins, suggesting that over 25% of lifespan determination is genetic. The remaining 75% of variation not directly impacted by genetic factors is accounted for by behavioral and environmental differences[3].

All species of mammals have a geriatric stage of life. This stage is rarely achieved by non-captive individuals. Frail individuals exposed to environmental pressures are more likely to die of extrinsic causes than intrinsic ones. Extrinsic pressures that affect mortality include nutrition, disease, climate and environment. Humans have been able to offset the cost of extrinsic pressures for themselves through culturally acquired knowledge [2]. By controlling these factors human populations across the world have extended their lifespans.


Controlling extrinsic variables of survival, humans have been able to uncover mechanisms for somatic maintenance and repair that help secure the longevity of an individual Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag. Never the less, women with the least amount of children were found to live the longest, suggesting a trade off between longevity and the ability to fix general physiological wear and tear as it occursCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag[4]

Species Percentage of Female Lifespan that is Postreproductive
Mountain Gorillas 1-3%
Japanese Macaques 9%
Humans 20-40%


Japanese Macaques

The post reproductive patterns of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) have been evaluated with the survivorship of their offspring, final infants and their great-offspring. Few female Japanese macaques reach reproductive termination. Those females who terminated reproduction before death have been shown to have similar offspring survivorship as those females who reproduced until death. However, final infants of females who reproduced until death were 13% less likely to survive then the final infants of females with a post reproductive lifespan. Females with a post reproductive lifespan are significantly longer lived and have a greater fecundity then those females that reproduced until death Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag

Species Average Adult Lifespan Age at Maturity Age at Weaning Period of Independent Growth Ratio of Weaning Weight to Adult Weight Daughters per Year
Orangutans 17.9 14.3 6 8.3 .28 .063
Gorilla 13.9 9.3 2 6.3 .21 .126
Chimpanzees 17.9 13 4.8 8.2 .27 .087
Humans 32.9 17.3 2.8 14.5 .21 .142


Great Apes

Neither gorillas (‘’Gorilla gorilla’’) or chimpanzees (‘’Pan troglodytes’’) regularly experience a post reproductive period of life. Although the birthrates of African Apes decrease with age, the survivorship of their offspring improves with maternal experience. In gorillas, miscarriage rates are significantly higher for older females then younger females Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag. In gorillas, there is not a significant difference between the mortality of infants whose mother died of natural causes and those who continued reproducing. In one population, no mother died of natural causes while she had offspring below weaning age Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag.


Menopause: Epiphenomenon or Adaptation?

There are two overarching theories regarding the emergence of a postreproductive life span. These include menopause either as an epiphenomenon or as an adaptation.


Menopause as an Epiphenomenon

An epiphenomenon is a secondary phenomenon that accompanies a physical phenomenon but has no causal influence in itself. Under this model, menopause is an epiphenomenon of a long life span and a reduction in oocyte viability instead of being directly adaptive in it’s own right Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tagCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too manyCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many[5]


Support of the Grandmother Hypothesis: Role of Maternal Grandmothers in Modern and Pre-Modern Societies

The importance of maternal grandmothers to their daughter’s fertility and offspring survival has been documented cross culturally. Pre-modern populations of Finnish and Canadian women with extended post-reproductive lifespans had more grandchildren then those who had shorter post-reproductive lifespans Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many. In Tokugaw, Japan the maternal grandmother was the only grandparent whose presence reduced the instances of child mortality [6]. Infants with surviving maternal grandmothers in early populations in Krummhörn, Germany were 1.8 times less likely to succumb to infant mortality between the 6th and 12th months of age. Comparatively, living paternal grandparents within the same population nearly doubled the relative risk of infant mortality within the first month of life Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many


In Gambia, the presence of maternal kin has been shown to improve child survivorships but not the fertility of females. Alternatively, patrilineal grandparents increased the mother’s birth rate but often had negative effects on fertility Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many. Maternal grandmothers were the only kin besides mothers who significantly improved the nutritional status of children. Children raised in the presence of a post-reproductive maternal grandmother were taller than those whose grandmothers were still reproductively active. Comparatively, paternal kin had negligible effects on the nutritional status of children in this population Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many. In this same patrilineal society, children who lived with their maternal grandmothers had a higher survival rate then those living with paternal relatives Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many. Maternal grandmothers are able to provide a competitive edge to their grandchildren, especially after the age of two Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many


1.) Cross-population qualitative and quantitative evidence for helpful grandmothers is not compelling.


Much of the evidence citing the impact of maternal grandmothers on the well being of their grandchildren is focused upon nutritional support and services. However, marked nutritional support seems to be rare. Instead grandmothers more frequently support their grandchildren in nondepreciable care. This includes assisting in food preparation, and filling administrative needs surrounding sustenance. Although these behaviors could have fitness-enhancing qualities for grandmothers and daughters, these benefits are applied simultaneously to all grandchildren with little individual cost per child Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many[7][8]. Although the costs associated with late reproduction seem daunting, they alone are unable to eliminate the fitness benefits of reproducing late [9].


Demographic models were constructed to determine the impact grandmothers on the fertility of their daughters and the survivorship of their grandchildren. These models utilized modern Ache demographic data and determined the point at which women could maximize fitness by diverting energy away from personal reproduction and towards investment in kin. Results of this study were unable to support the grandmother hypothesis [10]


3.) The grandmother hypothesis requires female philopatry, which does not appear likely in the hominine line.


According to the grandmother hypothesis, active participation of maternal grandmothers in their grandchildren’s lives has been an adaptive force behind the evolution of a postreproductive lifespan and menopause. However, this would suggest that human females must maintain lifelong contact with their mothers for a considerable portion of human evolution. From this it could be postulated that human ancestors commonly utilized a form of female philopatry in which female’s maintained contact with their natal group while the males dispersed. However, this evolutionary scenario is unlikely considering the evidence supporting male philopatry and female dispersal as the dominant organizational pattern present throughout evolution.


The nature of the fossil record prevents paleoanthropologists from being able to directly infer the behavioral, ecological and adaptive pressures facing our ancestors [11]. Thus an indirect approach is taken to piecing together our history. In addition to the comparative faunal, floral, and archaeological data used to reassemble the paleoenvironments of extinct hominids, the anatomy and behavior of living primates is considered as an analog to hominid adaptation [12].


Unlike many monkey groups, chimpanzees live in male bonded societies [13]. At maturity, females leave their natal groups and disperse into a non-related group, thus permanently separating themselves from their kin. Although there is evidence of slight variation in this pattern of dispersal, male dispersal is uncommon across the species.


Genetic evidence lends support female dispersal as the ancestral condition of modern humans. Using independent noncoding nuclear loci, it is possible to make predictions regarding the dispersal behavior of the ancestral populations that gave rise to extant species of living African apes and modern humans [14]. These results indicate that the last common ancestor of gorillas, chimpanzees and humans were likely to exhibit female philopatric dispersal with female gene flow restricted to short distances. However, the last common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans indicate increased female vagility and movement indicative of female dispersal and male philopatryCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag


The importance of men to the nutritional needs of foraging societies may be one of the keys to human organization. This organization may be due to the reliance on unrelated men for acquiring the majority of protein meat in the human diet. Thus it is unlikely that mothers were able to maintain lifelong contact with their daughters or maternal grandchildren.


4.) The role of males and siblings is ignored.


The grandmother hypothesis emphasizes the role of post reproductive females in increasing the fitness of their grandchildren. This does not account for the impact of other individuals on the survivorship of children. The importance of men and children to the care of related offspring must be taken into account.


Males play a significant role in the acquisition of protein in foraging societies. Into their sixties, Ache, Hadza, and Hiwi men typically provide a surplus of calories [15]. Older females are less likely to produce a surplus of calories and are therefore nutritionally dependent on their communities.


Independent foraging on behalf of children could help bolster their fitness and provide critical calories with little input from adult care givers. In addition to freeing human females from lactation, children have been shown to take an active role in addressing their nutritional needs. For instance, research indicates that children of hunter-gathers can play a substantial role in meeting their own nutritional needs and offsetting energetic costs that their families would otherwise be required to meet [16]. In addition, older children may be able to subsidize the nutritional and care giving needs of younger siblings. Older children assist with the allocation and procurement of resources and may provide the opportunity for cooperative breeding in humans [17]. In other words, children’s abilities to partially support themselves nutritionally may have immediate fitness trade-offs while indirectly improving the reproductive output of their mothers.


The New Grandmother Hypothesis

The new grandmother hypothesis changes the focus away from inclusive fitness and towards their impact on the evolution of hominid traits critical to human reproduction. Human reproductive success has been achieved through a suite of traits critical to the reduction of interbirth intervals. This suite includes reduced cost of lactation, a prolonged childhood and juvenile period, the ability of children to address a portion of their nutritional needs and finally increased communal breeding.


Like other primates, humans have an elongated gestation and an extended period of growth and development prior to maturity. However, significant reduction in interbirth intervals combined with the ability to overlap dependent offspring results in a life history pattern unlike that of any other mammal Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag.


High Fertility


The new grandmother hypothesis links high rates of human fecundity and the late age of maturity to grandmothers. It is assumed that the contribution of grandmothers increases their daughter’s annual fecundity and that birthrates for humans are distinctly different from those of the other great apes.


Great ape grandmothers are unlikely to impact the fitness of their grandchildren. Thus we would expect that life history traits tied to grandmothers would be found only in humans. According to the new grandmother hypothesis, human grandmothers are expected to experience a higher annual fecundity than other hominoid species. It would be expected that there would be distinct differences between the annual birthrate of great apes and humans. Although the annual birthrate of human hunter-gather populations is higher then either orangutans or chimpanzees, it remains similar to the birthrate of gorillas Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many


Compared to the other great apes, human infants are weaned comparatively early relative to age at maturity Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many. Extended growth continues to be important prior to sexual maturity in adolescence. This extra time enables young males and females to practice complex social skills prior to reproducing and may improve infant survivorship and the fitness of both parents [18].

According to the new grandmother hypothesis, grandmothers made possible an extended childhood period and this enabled the development of larger brains. Regardless of the importance of the childhood period, it is still unclear if childhood or larger brains evolved first. It is possible that the evolution of a larger brain and the need for more time to acquire knowledge, supported the evolution of an extended childhood.

3.) Post reproductive grandmothers were unlikely to existed in paleopopulations


In the new grandmother hypothesis, menopause arose from an extended life expectancy brought on by the fitness inducing qualities of maternal grandmothers. In this hypothesis, the maximum human lifespan surpassed the current age of menopause due to the influence of a post reproductive lifespan in human females. However, a causal relationship between grandmothering and increased lifespans is unable to be supported by the life expectancies and age structures in paleopopulations.


The manifestation of modern longevity in humans is critical in determining the timing and emergence of menopause. Due to the constraints of the fossil record it is difficult to precisely determine the timing of menopause in humans. However, research into Homo erectus suggests that menopause could be as early as 1.8 million years old Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many. Additional evidence using tooth wear serrations suggests that the most dramatic increase in longevity may have occurred closer to the Upper Paleolithic (approximately 30,000 year ago)[19]. This demographic transformation through increased human longevity coincides with an explosion of cultural complexity including symbolism, trade, technologies for gathering and storing food items, and markers of ethnic differences [20]. This work is unable to directly address the pattern of post reproductive success in humans, it does indicate that human longevity may be extremely recent in evolutionary terms.


References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). 1981. Research on the menopause. WHO technical Report Series, NO 670. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Kirkwood TBL. 2002. Evolution of aging. Mechanisms of ageing and development. 123:737-745.
  3. Abbott A. 2004. Growing old gracefully. Nature. 428:116-118.
  4. Robbins AM, Robbins MM, Gerald-Steklis N, Steklis HD. 2006. Age-related patterns of reproductive success among female mountain gorillas. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 131:511-521.
  5. Hamilton WD. 1966. The molding of senescence by natural selection. Journal of Theoretical Biological. 12: 12-45.
  6. Jamison CS, Cornell LL, Jamison PL, Nakazato H. 2002. Are all grandmothers equal? A review and a preliminary test of the “Grandmother Hypothesis” in Tokugawa Japan. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 119:67-76.
  7. Wood JW. 1994. Dynamics of Human Reproduction: Biology, Biometry, Demography. Aldine De Gruyter, New York.
  8. Gaulden ME. 1992. Maternal age effect: the enigma of Down Syndrome and other trisomic conditions. Mutat Res. 296:69-88.
  9. Rogers AR. 1993. Why menopause? Evolutionary Ecology. 7:406-420.
  10. Hill K, Hurtado AM. 1991. The evolution of premature reproductive senescence and menopause in human females: an evaluation of the “grandmother hypothesis.” Human Nature. 2:313-350.
  11. Hawkes K and O’Connell JF. 2005. How old is human longevity? Journal of Human Evolution. 49:650-653.
  12. Potts R. 1987. Reconstruction of early hominid socioecology: a critique of primate models. In WG Kinzey (Ed). The evolution of human behavior: primate models (pp 28-47) Albany: Suny Press.
  13. Wrangham RW. 1987. The significance of African apes for reconstructing human social evolution. In: The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models, ed. Kinzey W. SUNY Press, Albany. pp 51-71.
  14. Jensen-Seaman MI, Deinard AS, Kidd KK. 2001. Modern African ape populations as genetic and demographic models of the last common ancestor of humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas. The American Genetic Association. 92:475-480.
  15. Kaplan H, Hill K, Lancaster J, Hurtado AM. 2000. A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evol Anthropol. 9:156-185.
  16. Bird DW and Bird RB. 2000. The ethnoarchaeology of juvenile foragers: shellfishing strategies among Meriam children. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 19: 461-476.
  17. Kramer KL. 2005. Children’s help and the pace of reproduction: cooperative breeding in humans. Evolutionary Anthropology. 14:224-237.
  18. Bogin B. 1999. Evolutionary Perspectives of human growth and development. Ann. Rev. Anthrop. 28: 109-153.
  19. Caspari R and Lee S. 2004. Older age becomes common late in human evolution. PNAS. 101:10895-10900.
  20. Rosenberg K. 2004. Living longer: Information revolution, population expansion, and modern human origins. PNAS. 101:10847-10848.