European ballistic missile defense: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (Start for Write-a-Thon; continent of Europe) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Ballistic missile defense''', in the post-[[Cold War]] era, is increasingly an issue for '''[[Europe]]'''. The primary concern is no longer the Soviet Union, but [[Iran]] and possibly other Middle Eastern actors. While [[Russia]] theoretically is a threat, it is not a likely one. | '''Ballistic missile defense''', in the post-[[Cold War]] era, is increasingly an issue for '''[[Europe]]'''. The primary concern is no longer the Soviet Union, but [[Iran]] and possibly other Middle Eastern actors. While [[Russia]] theoretically is a threat, it is not a likely one. | ||
Russsia, however, became indignant over what it saw as U.S. action in its sphere of influence, when the [[George W. Bush Administration]] proposed placing [[Ground-Based Midcourse Interceptors]] in [[Poland]]. While much mass media coverage portrayed this as a shield against attacks against Eastern Europe, the particular technology proposed actually was optimized for protecting the East coast of the United States. | Russsia, however, became indignant over what it saw as U.S. action in its sphere of influence, when the [[George W. Bush Administration]] proposed placing [[Ground-Based Midcourse Interceptors]] in [[Poland]]. While much mass media coverage portrayed this as a shield against attacks against Eastern Europe, the particular technology proposed actually was optimized for protecting the East coast of the United States against [[intercontinental ballistic missile]]s. | ||
On 17 September 2009, the [[Obama administration]] withdrew the earlier proposal, in part because it could not be implemented for several years, and really did not address the short-term Iranian threat of [[intermediate-range ballistic missile]]s. An alternative approach can be deployed in a year, at lower cost. It has been proposed that the system be implemented as a European multilateral defense, rather than bilateral agreements with the U.S. | |||
==Review of threats== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
§submarine launched | §submarine launched | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! width=33%|Point of launch | ! width=33%|Point of launch | ||
| Line 42: | Line 45: | ||
! width=33%|Range | ! width=33%|Range | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Teheran | | rowspan=3 align=center| Teheran | ||
| Warsaw | | Warsaw | ||
| 3020 kilometers | | 3020 kilometers | ||
1876 miles | 1876 miles | ||
|- | |- | ||
| London | | London | ||
| 4408 kilometers | | 4408 kilometers | ||
2739 miles | 2739 miles | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Washington, DC | | Washington, DC | ||
| 10,201 kilometers | | 10,201 kilometers | ||
Revision as of 14:08, 10 October 2009
Ballistic missile defense, in the post-Cold War era, is increasingly an issue for Europe. The primary concern is no longer the Soviet Union, but Iran and possibly other Middle Eastern actors. While Russia theoretically is a threat, it is not a likely one.
Russsia, however, became indignant over what it saw as U.S. action in its sphere of influence, when the George W. Bush Administration proposed placing Ground-Based Midcourse Interceptors in Poland. While much mass media coverage portrayed this as a shield against attacks against Eastern Europe, the particular technology proposed actually was optimized for protecting the East coast of the United States against intercontinental ballistic missiles.
On 17 September 2009, the Obama administration withdrew the earlier proposal, in part because it could not be implemented for several years, and really did not address the short-term Iranian threat of intermediate-range ballistic missiles. An alternative approach can be deployed in a year, at lower cost. It has been proposed that the system be implemented as a European multilateral defense, rather than bilateral agreements with the U.S.
Review of threats
| Type | Range | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| medium range ballistic missile
(MRBM) |
800-2,399 km
500-1499 mi |
Iranian Shahab-3 Israeli Jericho II |
| intermediate range ballistic missile
(IRBM) |
1,400-5,499 km
1,500-3,437 mi |
Soviet SS-5 SKEAN,
Chinese DF-4, U.S. PGM-17 Thor |
| intercontinental ballistic missile
(ICBM) |
+ 5,500 km
+ 3,438 mi |
Chinese DF-5, Russian RT-2 and RSM-52§, |
§submarine launched
| Point of launch | Point of impact | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Teheran | Warsaw | 3020 kilometers
1876 miles |
| London | 4408 kilometers
2739 miles | |
| Washington, DC | 10,201 kilometers
6339 miles |
.