Epistemology: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger (" Surely if you are intensely thinking that you have no knowledge, that is certainly a contradiction!" -- no, it isn't. Knowledge isn't "intense thinking." :-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Epistemology''' (from Greek ἐπιστήμη, or ''episteme,'' knowledge; and λόγος, or ''logos,'' a study or account) is also called '''Theory of Knowledge.''' A [[philosophy|philosophical]] discipline, epistemology deals with broad questions: what is [[knowledge]]? Is [[certainty]] required for knowledge, and what is certainty anyway? From what sources--[[sense-perception]], say, or [[revelation]]--do we derive knowledge? Our beliefs can have more or less [[justification]], [[warrant]], or [[evidence]]--and these features seem, roughly speaking, required for knowledge. So what are they? Some thinkers doubt that we have any, or very much, knowledge at all. On what grounds can we embrace, or reject, such [[skepticism]]? | '''Epistemology''' (from Greek ἐπιστήμη, or ''episteme,'' knowledge; and λόγος, or ''logos,'' a study or account) is also called '''Theory of Knowledge.''' A [[philosophy|philosophical]] discipline, epistemology deals with broad questions: what is [[knowledge]]? Is [[certainty]] required for knowledge, and what is certainty anyway? From what sources--[[sense-perception]], say, or [[revelation]]--do we derive knowledge? Our beliefs can have more or less [[justification]], [[warrant]], or [[evidence]]--and these features seem, roughly speaking, required for knowledge. So what are they? Some thinkers doubt that we have any, or very much, knowledge at all. On what grounds can we embrace, or reject, such [[skepticism]]? | ||
Philosophers have virtually no unanimous views on these topics. Still, in the interest of getting the roughest lay of the land, we can quickly describe a few of the more common opinions. Many, perhaps most, philosophers hold that knowledge is something like [[JTB analysis|justified, true belief]]; that certainty is not actually required for knowledge; that our basic sources of knowledge include at the very least sense-perception, memory, and reasoning; | Philosophers have virtually no unanimous views on these topics. Still, in the interest of getting the roughest lay of the land, we can quickly describe a few of the more common opinions. Many, perhaps most, philosophers hold that knowledge is something like [[JTB analysis|justified, true belief]]; that certainty is not actually required for knowledge; that our basic sources of knowledge include at the very least sense-perception, memory, and reasoning; | ||
Revision as of 08:56, 5 September 2007
Epistemology (from Greek ἐπιστήμη, or episteme, knowledge; and λόγος, or logos, a study or account) is also called Theory of Knowledge. A philosophical discipline, epistemology deals with broad questions: what is knowledge? Is certainty required for knowledge, and what is certainty anyway? From what sources--sense-perception, say, or revelation--do we derive knowledge? Our beliefs can have more or less justification, warrant, or evidence--and these features seem, roughly speaking, required for knowledge. So what are they? Some thinkers doubt that we have any, or very much, knowledge at all. On what grounds can we embrace, or reject, such skepticism?
Philosophers have virtually no unanimous views on these topics. Still, in the interest of getting the roughest lay of the land, we can quickly describe a few of the more common opinions. Many, perhaps most, philosophers hold that knowledge is something like justified, true belief; that certainty is not actually required for knowledge; that our basic sources of knowledge include at the very least sense-perception, memory, and reasoning;
In the earlier part of the 20th century, certain other topics were often included in epistemology.