Double-Cross system: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: {{subpages}} In the WWII UK '''Double-Cross System''', all German spies in the British Isles were captured, and given a choice between execution and becoming a [[Counterintelligence#Double...)
 
imported>Hayford Peirce
(minor rewriting; do we really know *all* German spies were captured, every single one of them?)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
In the WWII UK '''Double-Cross System''', all German spies in the British Isles were captured, and given a choice between execution and becoming a [[Counterintelligence#Double agent | double agent]].<ref>{{cite book | author = Masterman, J. C.  | title = The Double-Cross System in the War of 1939–1945 | publisher = Yale University Press | year = 1972.}}</ref> The British-controlled double agents were part of a larger strategic [[Deception | deception]] operation, the principal intention of which was to make the Germans believe that the main Allied invasion would come at some place ''other'' than the actual beaches of Normandy.   
In the [[World War II]] '''Double-Cross System''' of the [[United Kingdom]], all German spies captured in the British Isles were given a choice between execution and becoming a [[Counterintelligence#Double agent | double agent]].<ref>{{cite book | author = Masterman, J. C.  | title = The Double-Cross System in the War of 1939–1945 | publisher = Yale University Press | year = 1972.}}</ref> The British-controlled double agents were part of a larger strategic [[Deception | deception]] operation, the principal intention of which was to make the Germans believe that the main Allied invasion would come at some place ''other'' than the actual beaches of Normandy.   


Only those German reconnaissance aircraft that would pass over appropriately arranged decoys were allowed to complete their missions, and the Allies generated dummy signals corresponding to imaginary units whose organization and position was supportive of the overall deception plans. HUMINT, IMINT, and SIGINT were all collecting plausible data and returning it to the Germans. The Germans were unable to use collection techniques that revealed the real Allied plan. This was part of the larger strategic deception program, Plan BODYGUARD, directed by the London Controlling Staff (LCS).<ref name=Bodyguard>{{citation
Only those German reconnaissance aircraft that would pass over appropriately arranged decoys were allowed to complete their missions, and the Allies generated dummy signals corresponding to imaginary units whose organization and position was supportive of the overall deception plans. HUMINT, IMINT, and SIGINT were all collecting plausible data and returning it to the Germans. The Germans were unable to use collection techniques that revealed the real Allied plan. This was part of the larger strategic deception program, Plan BODYGUARD, directed by the London Controlling Staff (LCS).<ref name=Bodyguard>{{citation

Revision as of 16:51, 5 June 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In the World War II Double-Cross System of the United Kingdom, all German spies captured in the British Isles were given a choice between execution and becoming a double agent.[1] The British-controlled double agents were part of a larger strategic deception operation, the principal intention of which was to make the Germans believe that the main Allied invasion would come at some place other than the actual beaches of Normandy.

Only those German reconnaissance aircraft that would pass over appropriately arranged decoys were allowed to complete their missions, and the Allies generated dummy signals corresponding to imaginary units whose organization and position was supportive of the overall deception plans. HUMINT, IMINT, and SIGINT were all collecting plausible data and returning it to the Germans. The Germans were unable to use collection techniques that revealed the real Allied plan. This was part of the larger strategic deception program, Plan BODYGUARD, directed by the London Controlling Staff (LCS).[2]

The counterespionage section of the U.S. Office of Strategic Services, which worked closely with the Double-Cross committee, was named X-2 in humorous respect for "XX".

References

  1. Masterman, J. C. (1972.). The Double-Cross System in the War of 1939–1945. Yale University Press. 
  2. Brown, Anthony Cave (2002), Bodyguard of Lies: The Extraordinary True Story Behind D-Day (Paperback), The Lyons Press