Discount rate/Tutorials: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
mNo edit summary
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 51: Line 51:


==The intergeneration transfer controversy==
==The intergeneration transfer controversy==
 
Sir Partha Dasgupta objected to the review's choice of eta on the grounds that it placed insufficient weight upon the comparative prosperity of current and future generations
<ref>[http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/faculty/dasgupta/STERN.pdf Sir Partha Dasgupta: ''Comments on The Stern Review’s Economics  of Climate Change'', November 2006]</ref>
<ref>[http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/faculty/dasgupta/STERN.pdf Sir Partha Dasgupta: ''Comments on The Stern Review’s Economics  of Climate Change'', November 2006]</ref>. Professor William Nordhaus also challenged the review's choice of eta and objected also to its arbitrary insistence on a zero pure rate of time preference.
 
<ref>[http://nordhaus.econ.yale.edu/stern_050307.pdf  William Nordhaus: '' The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change'', May 2007]</ref>
<ref>[http://nordhaus.econ.yale.edu/stern_050307.pdf  William Nordhaus: '' The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change'', May 2007]</ref>



Revision as of 02:33, 27 August 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Tutorials [?]
 
Tutorials relating to the topic of Discount rate.



The present value of future costs and benefits

The present value V of a cost (or benefit) occuring after an interval of t years at a dicount rate of r is given by:


The net present expected value of a future cost (or benefit) that has z possible values is given by calculating the value of in the above equation as:

where is the probability of occurrence of the value


The present value of a series of annual costs and benefits, ocurring after annual intervals 0 to n is given by:

.

The social time preference rate

The social time preference rate, s, is given by:-

s = δ + ηg

where:

δ is the pure time preference rate (otherwise known as the utility discount rate);
η is the elasticity of marginal utility with respect to consumption; and,
g is the expected future growth rate of consumption.


Evidence based upon the structure of personal income tax rates in OECD countries suggests that the value of η for most developed countries is close to 1.4 [1]. Estimates for the United Kingdom have ranged from 0.7 t0 1.5. [2].

The UK Treasury Green Book uses

δ = 1.5%, η = 1.0, g = 2%, yielding s = 3.5%

The Stern review uses

δ = 0.1%, η = 1.0, g = 2%, yielding s = 2.1%


The intergeneration transfer controversy

Sir Partha Dasgupta objected to the review's choice of eta on the grounds that it placed insufficient weight upon the comparative prosperity of current and future generations [3]. Professor William Nordhaus also challenged the review's choice of eta and objected also to its arbitrary insistence on a zero pure rate of time preference. [4]

References