Church of Scotland: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(add)
imported>Richard Jensen
(add text)
Line 22: Line 22:
The terrible death toll of World War I led to divergent interpretations as theology confronted popular culture. In 1914, Scotsmen enthusiastically enlisted, but by 1915 the toll of enormous numbers of men killed in battle ended old romantic views of war and death. Sermons and graves featured John 15:13, "Greater love hath no man . . ." It became a popular belief that young soldiers found salvation in dying in battle, and some clergymen compared such a death to Christ's sacrifice. The Church of Scotland and the United Free Church had clergymen who took this view, but the conservative Free Presbyterians argued that this belief contradicted Scripture; that is, unless someone was saved, a battle death could not prevent eternity in hell. Although this position was unpopular, Free Presbyterians held to it, refusing to compromise their beliefs for the sake of comforting people in the loss of their loved ones.<ref> James Lachlan MacLeod, "'Greater Love Hath No Man than This': Scotland's Conflicting Religious Responses to Death in the Great War." ''Scottish Historical Review'' 2002 81(1): 70-96. Issn: 0036-9241 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]] </ref>
The terrible death toll of World War I led to divergent interpretations as theology confronted popular culture. In 1914, Scotsmen enthusiastically enlisted, but by 1915 the toll of enormous numbers of men killed in battle ended old romantic views of war and death. Sermons and graves featured John 15:13, "Greater love hath no man . . ." It became a popular belief that young soldiers found salvation in dying in battle, and some clergymen compared such a death to Christ's sacrifice. The Church of Scotland and the United Free Church had clergymen who took this view, but the conservative Free Presbyterians argued that this belief contradicted Scripture; that is, unless someone was saved, a battle death could not prevent eternity in hell. Although this position was unpopular, Free Presbyterians held to it, refusing to compromise their beliefs for the sake of comforting people in the loss of their loved ones.<ref> James Lachlan MacLeod, "'Greater Love Hath No Man than This': Scotland's Conflicting Religious Responses to Death in the Great War." ''Scottish Historical Review'' 2002 81(1): 70-96. Issn: 0036-9241 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]] </ref>


==Schisms and Union==
==Schisms and Free Church==


Through the next two centuries major schisms occurred within the Church over the questions of patronage and state control. The principal separation Churches were the First Secession Church of 1733, the Relief Church of 1761, and the Free Church of 1843, all Presbyterian.  
Through the next two centuries major schisms occurred within the Church over the questions of patronage and state control. The principal separation Churches were the First Secession Church of 1733, the Relief Church of 1761, and the Free Church of 1843, all Presbyterian.  


The '''Disruption of 1843'' came on 18 May 1843 when 470 ministers (out of 1,200) seceded from the Church of Scotland, protesting lay patronage over parish ministers and the state's refusal to recognize the church's spiritual independence The complaint was that local notables had traditionally chosen the local ministers as a matter of patronage. In London, English politicians' reacted angrily. The conflict with the government began with the Veto Act passed by the General Assembly of the church in 1834. This act declared that the dissent of the congregation ought to be conclusive in setting aside appointments of parish ministers. Whig and Tory politicians alike opposed the Veto Act, both because it valorized the decisions of "ignorant" people and because the Veto Act would destroy the patronage system that was an integral element of party politics. After the Disruption, the new Free Church of Scotland was created by seceders; they voted strongly for the Liberal party.  
The evangelical movement in the early 19th century created a series of revivals and a challenge to the Moderates. It resembled the [[Second Great Awakening]] in the United States at about the same time. The evangelicals called for purification of its  members and ministers and attacked the patronage system that allowed local notables to select the local ministers. In the 1839s came the "Ten Years Conflict" between evangelicals on one side and the Moderates and gentry on the other. The evangelicals secured passage by the General Assembly in 1834, of the famous "Veto Act". This act asserted that it was a fundamental law of the Church that no pastor should be forced by the genty upon a congregation contrary to the popular will, and that any noominee could be rejected by majority of the heads of families. This direct blow at the right of private patrons was challenged in the civil courts, and was decided (1838) against the Church. The Free Church never adopted any new articles of faith, or any new ritual. It claimed to represent the legitimate Presbyterian Church of the country enjoying its full spiritual independence, and freed from the undue encroachment of the state.


The last 150 years, however, have witnessed the vital reunion of several bodies
The '''Disruption of 1843''' came on 18 May 1843 when 470 ministers (out of 1,200), led by Dr. Thomas Chalmers, seceded from the Church of Scotland. They were outraged at the gentry's control over parish ministers and the Parliament's refusal to recognize the church's spiritual independence. By seceding they gave up an annual income of £100,000 in total as well as the church buildings.  The seceders created a voluntary fund of over £400,000 to build new churches; colleges in Edinburgh and Aberdeen; manses (residences for the ministers) were erected at a cost of a quarter of a million; and an equal or larger amount was expended on the building of congregational schools. After the passing of the Education Act of 1872, most of these schools were voluntarily transferred by the Free Church to the newly established school-boards.


  culminating in 1929 in the joining of the United Free Church and the State Church as the Church of Scotland. For the last half of the century talks were underway aiming at a grand merger of the main Presbyterian, Episcopal and Methodist bodies in Scotland. In 2003, however, the rank and file of the Church of Scotland revolted against any recognition of bishops, and negotiations were broken off.
In London, English politicians' reacted angrily. Whig and Tory politicians alike opposed the Veto Act, both because it valorized the decisions of "ignorant" people and because it would destroy the patronage system that was an integral element of party politics. After the Disruption, the new Free Church of Scotland was created by seceders; they voted strongly for the Liberal party.
 
The most brilliant Free Church intellectual was William Robertson Smith (1846-1894), who was removed from his professorial chair at Aberdeen in 1881 on account of his "Higher Criticism" views on the Bible. By 1900, howver, the Higher Criticism won out and the Free Church's theology became largely based on the rationalizationing influence of German Protestant theology.
 
The last 150 years have witnessed the vital reunion of several bodies. In 1900, 1077 congregations of the of the Free Church Congregations entered a union with 599 congregations of the United Presbyterian Church. The result was the United Free Church of Scotland, with 500,000 members (compared to 700,000 in the Church of Scotland).  It supported 300 missionaries in Asia and Africa.  In 1929 the United Free Church rejoined the Church of Scotland, although 100 congregations remain separate as the "Free Church of Scotland."<ref> See the website at [http://www.freechurch.org/about.htm]</ref>
 
Talks began in the 1950s aiming at a grand merger of the main Presbyterian, Episcopal and Methodist bodies in Scotland. The talks broke off in 2003, however, when the rank and file of the Church of Scotland revolted against any recognition of bishops.


The Church of Scotland had about 960,000 adult members in 1980 and over 600,000 in 2006.
The Church of Scotland had about 960,000 adult members in 1980 and over 600,000 in 2006.


==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==
* Brown, Callum G.  ''Religion and Society in Scotland since 1707.'' Edinburgh U. Press, 1997. 219 pp.  
* Brown, Callum G.  ''Religion and Society in Scotland since 1707.'' Edinburgh U. Press, (1997). 219 pp.  
* Buchan, John. ''The Kirk in Scotland, 1560-1929'' (1985)  
* Buchan, John. ''The Kirk in Scotland, 1560-1929'' (1985)  
* Burleigh, J.H.S. ''A Church History of Scotland'' (1962), short and impartial
* Burleigh, J.H.S. ''A Church History of Scotland'' (1962), short and impartial
*  Marshall, Rosalind K.  ''John Knox.'' Edinburgh: Birlinn, 2000. 244 pp.   
* Drummond, A. L.,  and J. Bulloch. ''The Scottish Church, 1688–1843'' (1973)
*  Marshall, Rosalind K.  ''John Knox.'' Edinburgh: Birlinn, (2000). 244 pp.   
* Pope, Robert. ''Religion and National Identity: Wales and Scotland C. 1700-2000'' University of Wales Press, (2001), 355pp  [http://www.questia.com/read/107360930 online edition]
* Ross, K. R. ''Church and Creed in Scotland'' (1988).
* Todd, Margo.  ''The Culture of Protestantism in Early Modern Scotland.'' Yale U. Press, 2002. 450 pp.   
* Todd, Margo.  ''The Culture of Protestantism in Early Modern Scotland.'' Yale U. Press, 2002. 450 pp.   
* Walker, G., and T. Gallagher, eds. ''Sermons and Battle Hymns: Protestant Popular Culture in Modern Scotland'' (1990)
* Wormald, Jenny. ''Court, Kirk and Community, Scotland 1470-1625'' (1981), in The New History of Scotland [http://www.amazon.com/Court-Kirk-Community-Scotland-History/dp/0748602763/ref=sr_1_6/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1191469115&sr=8-6 excerpt and text search]
* Wormald, Jenny. ''Court, Kirk and Community, Scotland 1470-1625'' (1981), in The New History of Scotland [http://www.amazon.com/Court-Kirk-Community-Scotland-History/dp/0748602763/ref=sr_1_6/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1191469115&sr=8-6 excerpt and text search]
==External links==
==External links==
-----------
-----------
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 02:03, 7 October 2007

The Church of Scotland is the established national Church of Scotland. It is Calvinistic in doctrine and Presbyterian in government and discipline.

Origins

It was formed in the mid-16th century by John Knox (1514-1572) and the Protestant Lords of the Congregation. When Mary I became Queen in 1553 Knox fled to Switzerland, where he was strongly influenced by the Calvinist theology of John Calvin of Geneva; he sent many letters and pamphlets back to Scotland and returned in 1559.

The Presbyterianism which replaced the Latin Roman Catholic services and episcopal system of government was then regularized by the adoption of the Scots Confession, Knox's Liturgy, and the First Book of Discipline (replaced by the Second Book of Discipline in 1581). These innovations were at once opposed by the Erastian Stuart monarchy, and this opposition was not resolved until the signing of the National Covenant of 1638 and the Solemn League and Covenant of 1643, by the latter of which the Scottish Church adopted the Westminster symbols as permanent standards of doctrine, worship, and government. These symbols were the Westminster Confession, the "Larger" and "Shorter Catechisms," the "Directory for the Public Worship of God," the "Form of Presbyterian Church Government," and the new version of the Metrical Psalms. Following the return of Charles II to the throne in Restoration of 1660 and the "killing time" of the Covenanters, Presbyterianism was guaranteed as the national form of religion by the Revolution Settlement of 1690 and the Act of Union that merged Scotland and England in 1707.

17th century

Recent historiography has argued that the British ecclesiastical policies of James I, (king of England (1603–25) and, as James VI, of Scotland (1567–1625)), sought "congruity" between the different churches in Scotland, England, and Ireland rather than British ecclesiastical union or the Anglicanization of all the churches. The asymmetry of the changes he sought in Scotland and England has been underplayed and has masked his choice of a fundamentally Anglican model for the British churches. By allowing the archbishop of Canterbury to interfere in Scottish ecclesiastical affairs, undermining the Presbyterian system, and promoting episcopal power and liturgical reform, James pursued the Anglicanization of the Church of Scotland. The motivation for James's persistence is to be found in his rapid assimilation to the Church of England after 1603 and, moreover, in his goal of the reunification of Christendom as a whole on the Anglican model.[1]


1707 to 2007

Education

The Reformation leaders required that every parish operate a school. Supposedly many oatmeal-eating poor boys went on to university and became intellectul leaders. A myth grew up in the 19th century to the effect that Scotland thereby became the best educated nation in Europe and this democratic system helped cause its leading role in the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution. Historians exploded the myth. West showed in 1972 that the Scots were not significantly better educated than the English. Anderson in 1995 demonstrated that the schools existed (as they did in other Protestant countries) but they were not free and the generally imparted only basic literacy--the ability to read the Bible, which was the original goal. The schools did not have much role in the Highlands or the islands, or in the fast-growing industrial cities. A few talented poor boys did go to university, but usually with aristocratic sponsors. Most of them became poorly paid techers or ministers, and none became important figures in the Scotish Enlightenment or the Industrial Revolution. The Disruption of 1843 proved fatal to the system, and in 1872 Scotland moved to a system like England's state-sponsored free schools, dedicated to efficiency and high performance.[2]


Management

The Church pioneered some modern managerial systems in the 18th century. The church's organizational structure, centered on the kirk sessions and lay elders, established systems of accountability that involved extensive and detailed record-keeping, practices that could also be applied within a commercial setting. Comparison with English church governance reveals that the Scottish system promoted more extensive lay involvement, as well as engendering a systematic, less personal approach to management.[3]

Enlightenment

During the Scottish Enlightenment The Moderate party within the Church of Scotland was led by William Robertson (1721-93) from 1750 to 1775. Opponents of the Moderates accused them of hypocrisy and Arminianism for their failure either to reject the Westminster Confession or to truly accept it. Moderates focused their scholarship on history, not theology. They practiced conjectural history and “stadialism”, which projected current trends back into the past and divided history into developmental stages of human progress. This view of history allowed the Moderates to assume superiority over the founders of the Scottish Reformation and the Convenanters while continuing to respect their achievements and recognize their accompanying flaws. Generally the Moderates sought to defend the Church of Scotland and the stadialist approach allowed them to assume a progressive evolution of doctrine. It also redirected theological study from dogmatics to historical theology.[4]

20th century

The terrible death toll of World War I led to divergent interpretations as theology confronted popular culture. In 1914, Scotsmen enthusiastically enlisted, but by 1915 the toll of enormous numbers of men killed in battle ended old romantic views of war and death. Sermons and graves featured John 15:13, "Greater love hath no man . . ." It became a popular belief that young soldiers found salvation in dying in battle, and some clergymen compared such a death to Christ's sacrifice. The Church of Scotland and the United Free Church had clergymen who took this view, but the conservative Free Presbyterians argued that this belief contradicted Scripture; that is, unless someone was saved, a battle death could not prevent eternity in hell. Although this position was unpopular, Free Presbyterians held to it, refusing to compromise their beliefs for the sake of comforting people in the loss of their loved ones.[5]

Schisms and Free Church

Through the next two centuries major schisms occurred within the Church over the questions of patronage and state control. The principal separation Churches were the First Secession Church of 1733, the Relief Church of 1761, and the Free Church of 1843, all Presbyterian.

The evangelical movement in the early 19th century created a series of revivals and a challenge to the Moderates. It resembled the Second Great Awakening in the United States at about the same time. The evangelicals called for purification of its members and ministers and attacked the patronage system that allowed local notables to select the local ministers. In the 1839s came the "Ten Years Conflict" between evangelicals on one side and the Moderates and gentry on the other. The evangelicals secured passage by the General Assembly in 1834, of the famous "Veto Act". This act asserted that it was a fundamental law of the Church that no pastor should be forced by the genty upon a congregation contrary to the popular will, and that any noominee could be rejected by majority of the heads of families. This direct blow at the right of private patrons was challenged in the civil courts, and was decided (1838) against the Church. The Free Church never adopted any new articles of faith, or any new ritual. It claimed to represent the legitimate Presbyterian Church of the country enjoying its full spiritual independence, and freed from the undue encroachment of the state.

The Disruption of 1843 came on 18 May 1843 when 470 ministers (out of 1,200), led by Dr. Thomas Chalmers, seceded from the Church of Scotland. They were outraged at the gentry's control over parish ministers and the Parliament's refusal to recognize the church's spiritual independence. By seceding they gave up an annual income of £100,000 in total as well as the church buildings. The seceders created a voluntary fund of over £400,000 to build new churches; colleges in Edinburgh and Aberdeen; manses (residences for the ministers) were erected at a cost of a quarter of a million; and an equal or larger amount was expended on the building of congregational schools. After the passing of the Education Act of 1872, most of these schools were voluntarily transferred by the Free Church to the newly established school-boards.

In London, English politicians' reacted angrily. Whig and Tory politicians alike opposed the Veto Act, both because it valorized the decisions of "ignorant" people and because it would destroy the patronage system that was an integral element of party politics. After the Disruption, the new Free Church of Scotland was created by seceders; they voted strongly for the Liberal party.

The most brilliant Free Church intellectual was William Robertson Smith (1846-1894), who was removed from his professorial chair at Aberdeen in 1881 on account of his "Higher Criticism" views on the Bible. By 1900, howver, the Higher Criticism won out and the Free Church's theology became largely based on the rationalizationing influence of German Protestant theology.

The last 150 years have witnessed the vital reunion of several bodies. In 1900, 1077 congregations of the of the Free Church Congregations entered a union with 599 congregations of the United Presbyterian Church. The result was the United Free Church of Scotland, with 500,000 members (compared to 700,000 in the Church of Scotland). It supported 300 missionaries in Asia and Africa. In 1929 the United Free Church rejoined the Church of Scotland, although 100 congregations remain separate as the "Free Church of Scotland."[6]

Talks began in the 1950s aiming at a grand merger of the main Presbyterian, Episcopal and Methodist bodies in Scotland. The talks broke off in 2003, however, when the rank and file of the Church of Scotland revolted against any recognition of bishops.

The Church of Scotland had about 960,000 adult members in 1980 and over 600,000 in 2006.

Bibliography

  • Brown, Callum G. Religion and Society in Scotland since 1707. Edinburgh U. Press, (1997). 219 pp.
  • Buchan, John. The Kirk in Scotland, 1560-1929 (1985)
  • Burleigh, J.H.S. A Church History of Scotland (1962), short and impartial
  • Drummond, A. L., and J. Bulloch. The Scottish Church, 1688–1843 (1973)
  • Marshall, Rosalind K. John Knox. Edinburgh: Birlinn, (2000). 244 pp.
  • Pope, Robert. Religion and National Identity: Wales and Scotland C. 1700-2000 University of Wales Press, (2001), 355pp online edition
  • Ross, K. R. Church and Creed in Scotland (1988).
  • Todd, Margo. The Culture of Protestantism in Early Modern Scotland. Yale U. Press, 2002. 450 pp.
  • Walker, G., and T. Gallagher, eds. Sermons and Battle Hymns: Protestant Popular Culture in Modern Scotland (1990)
  • Wormald, Jenny. Court, Kirk and Community, Scotland 1470-1625 (1981), in The New History of Scotland excerpt and text search

External links


  1. Alan R. Macdonald, "James VI and I, the Church of Scotland, and British Ecclesiastical Convergence". Historical Journal2005 48(4): 885-903. Issn: 0018-246x
  2. R. D. Anderson, Education and the Scottish People, 1750-1918 1995.
  3. Alistair Mutch, "Management Practice and Kirk Sessions: an Exploration of the Scottish Contribution to Management." Journal of Scottish Historical Studies2004 24(1): 1-19.
  4. Colin Kidd, "Subscription, the Scottish Enlightenment and the Moderate Interpretation of History" Journal of Ecclesiastical History 2004 55(3): 502-519. Issn: 0022-0469
  5. James Lachlan MacLeod, "'Greater Love Hath No Man than This': Scotland's Conflicting Religious Responses to Death in the Great War." Scottish Historical Review 2002 81(1): 70-96. Issn: 0036-9241 Fulltext: Ebsco
  6. See the website at [1]