Chemical terrorism: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>T. Mark Ellis
imported>T. Mark Ellis
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
Chemical terrorism is also qualitatively different from [[biological terrorism]]
Chemical terrorism is also qualitatively different from [[biological terrorism]]
involving infectious diseases, but quite similar to the
involving infectious diseases, but quite similar to the
covert employment of biologically-produced [[toxins]], which differ from
covert employment of biologically-produced [[toxins]], which differ from synthetic poisons mainly in their extreme potency and the means by
synthetic poisons mainly in their extreme potency and the means by
which they are produced.
which they are produced.


Line 31: Line 30:
Iraq was the possibility that chemical weapons technology developed and
Iraq was the possibility that chemical weapons technology developed and
used by Iraq could be transferred to terrorist organizations.
used by Iraq could be transferred to terrorist organizations.
== Tactics ==
The main issue in chemical warfare, for high-tech state-funded military users as well as for non-traditional forces, is distributing the material efficiently in the target area. In most chemical warfare scenarios, much or most of the toxic agent will be destroyed by explosive dispersal devices, delivered in massive overkill quantities to a few victims, and/or broadcast into areas where no potential victims exist. Toxic agents that do not find victims immediately on delivery may degrade spontaneously, or be deactivated or sequestered by decontamination teams.
It is rarely reasonable to think of chemical weapons as weapons of mass destruction in the sense of even the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs. Realistic chemical attacks will be on a smaller scale, but a campaign of such attacks could be extremely disruptive. On the other hand, chemical weapons can be weapons of mass terror, because people in a target area - or simply in what they perceive to be a target area or potential target area - will not know whether or not they've been poisoned.
Methods used by terrorists or hypothesized by analysts include:
* Contamination of reservoirs and urban water supply systems.
* Contamination of food, beverages, drugs, or cosmetics in manufacturing or distribution processes.
* Contamination of food or beverages near the point of consumption.
* Miscellaneous product contaminations: stamps/envelopes, IV fluids, etc.
* Release of gases or aerosols into building HVAC systems.
* Release of gases or aerosols from aircraft.
* Dispersal in bombs or projectiles.
* Miscellaneous direct methods: hand sprayers, water guns, parcels.
* Release of industrial/agricultural chemicals via attacks on production or storage facilities.
* Release of industrial/agricultural chemicals via attacks on truck, rail, or barge shipping.
* Miscellaneous releases of industrial/agricultural chemicals, especially anhydrous ammonia, fumigants and pesticides, and disinfectant gases (e.g., chlorine, chlorine dioxide, ethylene oxide).


[[Category:CZ Live]]
[[Category:CZ Live]]

Revision as of 01:41, 8 March 2007

Chemical terrorism is the form of terrorism that uses the toxic effects of chemicals to kill, injure, or otherwise adversely affect the interests of its targets.

Introduction

While there may be controversy about the definition of the politically-charged word "terrorism," the tactics and technology of chemical terrorism are clearly distinguished from those of other forms of chemical warfare. Chemical terrorism is asymmetric warfare as practiced by non-uniformed forces using light and/or improvised weapons against non-combatant targets. It is therefore unlike the symmetric warfare of the First World War, in which dug-in troops fired poison-filled artillery shells at each other across a wire-bounded no-man's-land. It is also distinct from the asymmetric "terror from above" that uses uniformed military personnel and such military delivery systems as bombs, missiles, and artillery shells to terrorize civilian populations.

Chemical terrorism is also qualitatively different from biological terrorism involving infectious diseases, but quite similar to the covert employment of biologically-produced toxins, which differ from synthetic poisons mainly in their extreme potency and the means by which they are produced.

There have been few documented acts of chemical terrorism, and none of those has caused casualties justifying the treatment of chemical weapons as "Weapons of Mass Destruction." However, there has been much discussion and some serious study of the possibility of chemical terrorism. One of the stated concerns leading to the 2003 invasion of Iraq was the possibility that chemical weapons technology developed and used by Iraq could be transferred to terrorist organizations.

Tactics

The main issue in chemical warfare, for high-tech state-funded military users as well as for non-traditional forces, is distributing the material efficiently in the target area. In most chemical warfare scenarios, much or most of the toxic agent will be destroyed by explosive dispersal devices, delivered in massive overkill quantities to a few victims, and/or broadcast into areas where no potential victims exist. Toxic agents that do not find victims immediately on delivery may degrade spontaneously, or be deactivated or sequestered by decontamination teams.

It is rarely reasonable to think of chemical weapons as weapons of mass destruction in the sense of even the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs. Realistic chemical attacks will be on a smaller scale, but a campaign of such attacks could be extremely disruptive. On the other hand, chemical weapons can be weapons of mass terror, because people in a target area - or simply in what they perceive to be a target area or potential target area - will not know whether or not they've been poisoned.

Methods used by terrorists or hypothesized by analysts include:

  • Contamination of reservoirs and urban water supply systems.
  • Contamination of food, beverages, drugs, or cosmetics in manufacturing or distribution processes.
  • Contamination of food or beverages near the point of consumption.
  • Miscellaneous product contaminations: stamps/envelopes, IV fluids, etc.
  • Release of gases or aerosols into building HVAC systems.
  • Release of gases or aerosols from aircraft.
  • Dispersal in bombs or projectiles.
  • Miscellaneous direct methods: hand sprayers, water guns, parcels.
  • Release of industrial/agricultural chemicals via attacks on production or storage facilities.
  • Release of industrial/agricultural chemicals via attacks on truck, rail, or barge shipping.
  • Miscellaneous releases of industrial/agricultural chemicals, especially anhydrous ammonia, fumigants and pesticides, and disinfectant gases (e.g., chlorine, chlorine dioxide, ethylene oxide).