Charles A. Beard: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(import from Wiki (mostly by RJ))
 
imported>Richard Jensen
(cleanup)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Biography|
'''Charles Austin Beard''' (November 27, 1874 - September 1, 1948) was, (along with [[Frederick Jackson Turner]]) the most influential American historian of the early 20th century.  He published hundreds of monographs, textbooks and interpretive studies in both history and political science. He graduated from DePauw College in 1898, where he met and eventually married Mary Ritter Beard, his lifelong collaborator and coauthor. She was an early specialist in women's history
subject_name=|Charles Austin Beard|
 
image_name=Charles Austin Beard.jpg|
image_caption=|
date_of_birth=[[November 27]], [[1874]] |
place_of_birth=[[Knightstown, Indiana|Knightstown]], [[Indiana]], [[USA]] |
  dead=dead |
date_of_death=[[September 1]], [[1948]], age 73 |
place_of_death=[[New Haven, Connecticut|New Haven]], [[Connecticut]], [[USA]]
}}
'''Charles Austin Beard''' ([[November 27]], [[1874]] - [[September 1]], [[1948]]) was, (along with [[Frederick Jackson Turner]]) the most influential American historian of the early 20th century.  He published hundreds of monographs, textbooks and interpretive studies in both history and political science. He graduated from [[DePauw University]] in 1898, where he met and eventually married one of the founders of the first greek-letter society for women, [[Kappa Alpha Theta]].
==Progressive Historiography==
==Progressive Historiography==
As a leader of the "Progressive School" of historiography, he introduced themes of economic self-interest and economic conflict regarding the adoption of the Constitution and the transformations caused by the Civil War. Thus he emphasized the long-term conflict among industrialists in the Northeast, farmers in the Midwest, and planters in the South that he saw as the cause of the [[American Civil War|Civil War]].  His study of the financial interests of the drafters of the [[United States Constitution]] (''[[An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution]]'') seemed radical in [[1913]], since he proposed that the U.S. Constitution was a product of economically determinist, land-holding [[Founding Fathers of the United States|founding fathers]]. He saw ideology as a product of economic interests.  
As a leader of the "Progressive School" of historiography, he introduced themes of economic self-interest and economic conflict regarding the adoption of the Constitution and the transformations caused by the Civil War. Thus he emphasized the long-term conflict among industrialists in the Northeast, farmers in the Midwest, and planters in the South that he saw as the cause of the [[American Civil War]].  His study of the financial interests of the drafters of the [[United States Constitution]] (''An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution'') was radical in 1913, since he proposed that the U.S. Constitution was less a matter of political values and more a product of economic interests of the founding fathers. That is, he saw ideology as a minor byproduct product of economic interests.  Beard's interpretation held sway for 40 years until Robert Brown (1954) revealed its contradictions and Forrest McDonald (1958) showed that Charles Beard had misinterpreted the economic interests involved in writing the Constitution. Instead of two interests, landed and mercantile, which conflicted, there were over 30 identifiable interests that forced the delegates to bargain.


Beard's most influential book was the wide-ranging and bestselling ''The Rise of American Civilization'' (1927) and its two sequels, ''America in Midpassage'' (1939), and ''The American Spirit'' (1943), written with Mary Beard.   
Beard's most influential book was the wide-ranging and bestselling ''The Rise of American Civilization'' (1927) and its two sequels, ''America in Midpassage'' (1939), and ''The American Spirit'' (1943), written with Mary Beard.   


Dealing with Reconstruction and the Gilded Age, disciples of Beard such as Howard Beale and [[C. Vann Woodward]] focused on greed and economic causation and emphasized the centrality of corruption. They argued that the rhetoric of equal rights was a smokescreen hiding their true motivation, which was promoting the interests of industrialists in the Northeast.  The basic flaw was the assumption that there was a unified business policy. Scholars in the 1950s and 1960s demonstrated that businessmen were widely divergent on monetary or tariff policy. While Pennsylvania businessmen wanted high tariffs, those in other states did not; the railroads were hurt by the tariffs on steel, which they purchased in large quantity. (Hofstadter 1979) [[Forrest McDonald]] In ''We The People: The Economic Origins of the Constitution'' (1958) argued that Charles Beard had misinterpreted the economic interests involved in writing the Constitution. Instead of two interests, landed and mercantile, which conflicted, there were three dozen identifiable interests that forced the delegates to bargain.
Dealing with Reconstruction and the Gilded Age, disciples of Beard such as Howard Beale and [[C. Vann Woodward]] focused on greed and economic causation and emphasized the centrality of corruption. They argued that the rhetoric of equal rights was a smokescreen hiding their true motivation, which was promoting the interests of industrialists in the Northeast.  The basic flaw was the assumption that there was a unified business policy. Scholars in the 1950s and 1960s demonstrated that businessmen were widely divergent on monetary or tariff policy. While Pennsylvania businessmen wanted high tariffs, those in other states did not; the railroads were hurt by the tariffs on steel, which they purchased in large quantity. (Hofstadter 1979) [[Forrest McDonald]]  
 
Beard's economic approach lost favor in the history profession after 1950 as conservative scholars demonstrated the serious flaws in Beard's research, and attention turned away from economic causation. <ref> Hofstadter 1969</ref>
Beard's economic approach lost favor in the history profession after 1950 as conservative scholars demonstrated the serious flaws in Beard's research, and attention turned away from economic causation. <ref> Hofstadter 1969</ref>


==Labor education==
After resigning from [[Columbia University]] in protest at pro-war actions in 1917, he helped to found the [[New School for Social Research]] in New York. He advised on reconstructing Tokyo after the earthquake of 1923. Although enormously influential through his massive writings, he did not have graduate students or build a school of [[historiography]].
Beard's interest in progressive higher education was an early one.  In [[1899]], he collaborated with [[John Ruskin]] at [[Oxford]] in the founding of [[Ruskin House]], the first institution of [[labor education]], and which set in motion a succession of failed attempts in the [[United States]] which finally culminated with the founding of the [[National Labor College]] in [[1999]].
 
After resigning from [[Columbia University]] in protest in 1917, he helped to found the [[New School for Social Research]] in [[New York City|New York]], and advised on reconstructing [[Tokyo]] after the earthquake of 1923. Although enormously influential through his massive writings, he did not have graduate students or build a school of [[historiography]].
==Mary Beard, wife and coauthor==
Many of his books were written in collaboration with his wife, [[Mary Ritter Beard]] whose own interests lay in [[feminism]] and the [[labor union]] movement (''Woman as a Force in History,'' 1946). Together they wrote a popular survey, ''The Beards: Basic History of the United States''. 


==Isolationist foreign policy==
==Isolationist foreign policy==
Starting as a leading liberal supporter of the [[New Deal]], Beard turned against [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt|Franklin D. Roosevelt]]'s aggressive foreign policy.  Beard promoted "American Continentalism," arguing that the U.S. had no vital stake in Europe, and that a foreign war would threaten dictatorship at home.  Beard was thus one of the leading proponents of [[United States isolationism]].  After the war, Beard's last work (''President Roosevelt and the Coming of the War'', 1948) blamed Roosevelt for lying to the American people and tricking them into war.  It generated angry controversy as internationalists denounced Beard as an apologist for isolationism. As a result, Beard's reputation collapsed among liberal historians who previously had admired him. His whole interpretation of history came under widespread attack, though a few leading historians such as Beale and  Woodward clung to the Beardian interpretation of American history.
Starting as a leading liberal supporter of the [[New Deal]], Beard in the late 1930s turned against Franklin Delano Roosevelt's aggressive foreign policy.  Beard promoted "American Continentalism," arguing that the U.S. had no vital stake in Europe, and that a foreign war would threaten dictatorship at home.  Beard was thus one of the leading proponents of isolationism.  After the war, Beard's last work (''President Roosevelt and the Coming of the War'', 1948) blamed Roosevelt for lying to the American people and tricking them into war.  It generated angry controversy as internationalists denounced Beard as an apologist for isolationism. As a result, Beard's reputation collapsed among liberal historians who previously had admired him. His whole interpretation of history came under widespread attack, though a few leading historians such as Beale and  Woodward clung to the Beardian interpretation of American history. After 1990 Beard's foreign policy views became popular with supporters of [[paleoconservatism]], such as [[Pat Buchanan]].  Beard's stress on economic causation influenced the "Wisconsin school" of [[New Left]] historians William Appleman Williams, Gabriel Kolko, and James Weinstein.


Recently however, Beard's isolationist approach, especially his advocacy of a non-interventionist foreign policy, have enjoyed something of a comeback. [[Andrew Bacevich]], a historian of diplomacy from [[Boston University]], has used Beard's skepticism towards armed intervention overseas as a starting point for his own critique of post-Cold War American foreign policy. Beard is heavily cited in Bacevich's analysis of this policy, ''American Empire''. In addition, Beard's foreign policy views have become popular with supporters of [[paleoconservatism]], such as [[Pat Buchanan]].  Beard's stress on economic causation influenced the "Wisconsin school" of [[New Left]] historians [[William Appleman Williams]], [[Gabriel Kolko]], and [[James Weinstein]].
==Political scientist==
==Political scientist==
In the field of political science, Beard was elected president of the American Political Science Association. He was best known for his studies of the Constitution, and for his creation of bureaus of municipal research and his studies of public administration in cities, including a famous study of Tokyo, '' The Administration and Politics of Tokyo,'' (1923).
In the field of political science, Beard was elected president of the American Political Science Association. He was best known for his studies of the Constitution, and for his creation of bureaus of municipal research and his studies of public administration in cities, including a famous study of Tokyo, '' The Administration and Politics of Tokyo,'' (1923).
Line 39: Line 23:
* Bernard C. Borning; ''The Political and Social Thought of Charles A. Beard.'' University of Washington Press, 1962 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=72526471 online edition]
* Bernard C. Borning; ''The Political and Social Thought of Charles A. Beard.'' University of Washington Press, 1962 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=72526471 online edition]
*Robert Eldon Brown, ''Charles Beard and the Constitution: A critical analysis of "An economic interpretation of the Constitution"'' (1954).
*Robert Eldon Brown, ''Charles Beard and the Constitution: A critical analysis of "An economic interpretation of the Constitution"'' (1954).
*Bacevich, Andrew J. ''American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of U.S. Diplomacy''. (2002) argues that while Beard might have been wrong about the need to oppose Hitler, he assessed how American economic interests drive foreign policy.
*Nancy F. Cott. ''A Woman Making History: Mary Ritter Beard through Her Letters.'' (1991).
*Nancy F. Cott. ''A Woman Making History: Mary Ritter Beard through Her Letters.'' (1991).
*[http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/rcah/html/ah_008500_beardcharles.htm Cott, Nancy. Online article from ''The Reader's Companion to American History'']
*[http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/rcah/html/ah_008500_beardcharles.htm Cott, Nancy. Online article from ''The Reader's Companion to American History'']
Line 59: Line 42:
* [http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/mcguire.constitution.us.economic.interests Recent empirical research on Beard's thesis and economic factors behind the American Constitution] from EH.NET's Encyclopedia.
* [http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/mcguire.constitution.us.economic.interests Recent empirical research on Beard's thesis and economic factors behind the American Constitution] from EH.NET's Encyclopedia.
* {{Gutenberg|no=16960|name=History of the United States}} a school textbook by Beard
* {{Gutenberg|no=16960|name=History of the United States}} a school textbook by Beard
* [http://www.iefd.org/articles/class_and_pluralism.php Class and Pluralism in America: The Constitution Reconsidered]

Revision as of 13:19, 11 April 2007

Charles Austin Beard (November 27, 1874 - September 1, 1948) was, (along with Frederick Jackson Turner) the most influential American historian of the early 20th century. He published hundreds of monographs, textbooks and interpretive studies in both history and political science. He graduated from DePauw College in 1898, where he met and eventually married Mary Ritter Beard, his lifelong collaborator and coauthor. She was an early specialist in women's history

Progressive Historiography

As a leader of the "Progressive School" of historiography, he introduced themes of economic self-interest and economic conflict regarding the adoption of the Constitution and the transformations caused by the Civil War. Thus he emphasized the long-term conflict among industrialists in the Northeast, farmers in the Midwest, and planters in the South that he saw as the cause of the American Civil War. His study of the financial interests of the drafters of the United States Constitution (An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution) was radical in 1913, since he proposed that the U.S. Constitution was less a matter of political values and more a product of economic interests of the founding fathers. That is, he saw ideology as a minor byproduct product of economic interests. Beard's interpretation held sway for 40 years until Robert Brown (1954) revealed its contradictions and Forrest McDonald (1958) showed that Charles Beard had misinterpreted the economic interests involved in writing the Constitution. Instead of two interests, landed and mercantile, which conflicted, there were over 30 identifiable interests that forced the delegates to bargain.

Beard's most influential book was the wide-ranging and bestselling The Rise of American Civilization (1927) and its two sequels, America in Midpassage (1939), and The American Spirit (1943), written with Mary Beard.

Dealing with Reconstruction and the Gilded Age, disciples of Beard such as Howard Beale and C. Vann Woodward focused on greed and economic causation and emphasized the centrality of corruption. They argued that the rhetoric of equal rights was a smokescreen hiding their true motivation, which was promoting the interests of industrialists in the Northeast. The basic flaw was the assumption that there was a unified business policy. Scholars in the 1950s and 1960s demonstrated that businessmen were widely divergent on monetary or tariff policy. While Pennsylvania businessmen wanted high tariffs, those in other states did not; the railroads were hurt by the tariffs on steel, which they purchased in large quantity. (Hofstadter 1979) Forrest McDonald Beard's economic approach lost favor in the history profession after 1950 as conservative scholars demonstrated the serious flaws in Beard's research, and attention turned away from economic causation. [1]

After resigning from Columbia University in protest at pro-war actions in 1917, he helped to found the New School for Social Research in New York. He advised on reconstructing Tokyo after the earthquake of 1923. Although enormously influential through his massive writings, he did not have graduate students or build a school of historiography.

Isolationist foreign policy

Starting as a leading liberal supporter of the New Deal, Beard in the late 1930s turned against Franklin Delano Roosevelt's aggressive foreign policy. Beard promoted "American Continentalism," arguing that the U.S. had no vital stake in Europe, and that a foreign war would threaten dictatorship at home. Beard was thus one of the leading proponents of isolationism. After the war, Beard's last work (President Roosevelt and the Coming of the War, 1948) blamed Roosevelt for lying to the American people and tricking them into war. It generated angry controversy as internationalists denounced Beard as an apologist for isolationism. As a result, Beard's reputation collapsed among liberal historians who previously had admired him. His whole interpretation of history came under widespread attack, though a few leading historians such as Beale and Woodward clung to the Beardian interpretation of American history. After 1990 Beard's foreign policy views became popular with supporters of paleoconservatism, such as Pat Buchanan. Beard's stress on economic causation influenced the "Wisconsin school" of New Left historians William Appleman Williams, Gabriel Kolko, and James Weinstein.

Political scientist

In the field of political science, Beard was elected president of the American Political Science Association. He was best known for his studies of the Constitution, and for his creation of bureaus of municipal research and his studies of public administration in cities, including a famous study of Tokyo, The Administration and Politics of Tokyo, (1923).

Bibliography

Bibliography of the writings of Charles Beard]

  • Clyde W. Barrow. More Than a Historian: The Political and Economic Thought of Charles A. Beard. (2000).
  • Bernard C. Borning; The Political and Social Thought of Charles A. Beard. University of Washington Press, 1962 online edition
  • Robert Eldon Brown, Charles Beard and the Constitution: A critical analysis of "An economic interpretation of the Constitution" (1954).
  • Nancy F. Cott. A Woman Making History: Mary Ritter Beard through Her Letters. (1991).
  • Cott, Nancy. Online article from The Reader's Companion to American History
  • Dennis, L. (1990) George S. Counts and Charles A. Beard: Collaborators for Change. (SUNY Series in the Philosophy of Education). State Univ of New York Press.
  • Marc Egnal, "The Beards Were Right: Parties in the North, 1840-1860," Civil War History, Vol. 47, 2001
  • Richard Hofstadter, The Progressive Historians: Turner, Beard, Parrington (1979), analysis of Beard's historiography.
  • Kennedy, Thomas C. Charles A. Beard and American Foreign Policy (1975) online edition
  • Forrest McDonald We The People: The Economic Origins of the Constitution (1958)
  • Ellen Nore. Charles A. Beard: An Intellectual Biography (1983). online edition
  • Ronald Radosh. Prophets on the Right: Profiles of Conservative Critics of American Globalism (1978)
  • Strout, Cushing. The Pragmatic Revolt in American History: Carl Becker and Charles Beard (1958) online edition

Primary sources

External links

  1. ↑ Hofstadter 1969
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Charles_A._Beard&oldid=193814"