CZ Talk:Recipes: Revision history

26 May 2008

• curprev 05:3905:39, 26 May 2008‎ imported>Supten Sarbadhikari‎ 84,512 bytes +399‎ No edit summary

3 May 2008

• curprev 23:5923:59, 3 May 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 84,113 bytes +361‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: Another Net mystery -- but keep your pecker up, as the old-time Brits used to say
• curprev 22:4122:41, 3 May 2008‎ imported>J. Noel Chiappa‎ 83,943 bytes +191‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: And no doubt others didn't reply because they saw mine...
• curprev 19:4419:44, 3 May 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 83,752 bytes +4,408‎ →‎Bearnaise recipe finished, comments needed on its formatting: also on its style and anything else that occurs to you
• curprev 17:3117:31, 3 May 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 83,161 bytes +1,052‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: yup, yours turned up 1 hr. and 4 min. later....
• curprev 17:2817:28, 3 May 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 83,019 bytes +910‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: Noel, I never saw your reply -- I never got a "new message in Forum" heads up....
• curprev 16:5216:52, 3 May 2008‎ imported>J. Noel Chiappa‎ 82,471 bytes +362‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: Hayford, I saw your post on the forums and replied about an hour later!
• curprev 12:1012:10, 3 May 2008‎ imported>Brian P. Long‎ 82,109 bytes +1,747‎ →‎English standard
• curprev 11:4511:45, 3 May 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 81,823 bytes +889‎ →‎English standard: just trying to make sure this is clear, at least to me
• curprev 10:4410:44, 3 May 2008‎ imported>Brian P. Long‎ 80,934 bytes +572‎ →‎English standard
• curprev 00:4600:46, 3 May 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 80,362 bytes +1,018‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: a word with no English equivalent
• curprev 00:0800:08, 3 May 2008‎ imported>Meg Taylor‎ 79,904 bytes +560‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: ratatouille

2 May 2008

• curprev 23:0623:06, 2 May 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 79,654 bytes +310‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: Tous les gouts sont dans la nature, as my French wife used to say
• curprev 23:0223:02, 2 May 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 79,344 bytes +11,756‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: corrected "necessary" to "unnecessary" -- a subtle difference, perhaps, but vital
• curprev 22:5722:57, 2 May 2008‎ imported>Meg Taylor‎ 79,342 bytes +11,660‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: guinea pig

1 May 2008

• curprev 21:2321:23, 1 May 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 79,145 bytes +765‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!
• curprev 21:0521:05, 1 May 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 79,050 bytes +670‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: a million thanks, it works perfectly
• curprev 20:2220:22, 1 May 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 78,607 bytes +227‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!
• curprev 19:0119:01, 1 May 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 78,380 bytes +10,698‎ →‎Would someone PLEASE help me!: How can I add recipes to articles if I can't make a Recipe Template come into existence?!

30 April 2008

• curprev 20:4820:48, 30 April 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 77,108 bytes +132‎ →‎English standard: no Blutwurst Germanic Sausage Mit Croucroute in the title
• curprev 19:4119:41, 30 April 2008‎ imported>J. Noel Chiappa‎ 76,976 bytes +4,248‎ →‎English standard: If it's wellknown in the original, use that
• curprev 12:2512:25, 30 April 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 76,480 bytes +1,119‎ →‎quality control: there are, right now, a couple of recipes without any accompanying article. I think we need a firm policy decided upon....
• curprev 11:5711:57, 30 April 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 75,361 bytes +1,242‎ →‎English standard: I don't see any problems here
• curprev 11:1011:10, 30 April 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 74,739 bytes +387‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 01:2701:27, 30 April 2008‎ imported>Meg Taylor‎ 74,352 bytes +233‎ No edit summary

29 April 2008

• curprev 21:0021:00, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 74,119 bytes +1,391‎ →‎English standard: please give some examples
• curprev 20:3020:30, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Brian P. Long‎ 73,437 bytes +709‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 19:3419:34, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Meg Taylor‎ 72,728 bytes +1,389‎ standards
• curprev 17:4617:46, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 72,540 bytes +1,201‎ →‎quality control: if we had *lotsa* active editors in the Food Sciences workgroup, sure
• curprev 15:2015:20, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Robert W King‎ 71,655 bytes +316‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 15:1015:10, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 71,339 bytes +2,994‎ →‎quality control: no recipe should be included in CZ unless it's with an article -- what could be simpler than that? And would prevent CZ becoming a blog site for recipes
• curprev 13:3613:36, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Robert W King‎ 68,502 bytes +157‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 13:3013:30, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ 68,345 bytes +663‎ →‎quality control: The Don the Beachcomber articles are great. :-)
• curprev 13:0313:03, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Robert W King‎ m 68,228 bytes +448‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 04:1904:19, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ m 67,780 bytes +2‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 04:1304:13, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ m 67,778 bytes +96‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 04:1004:10, 29 April 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ m 67,682 bytes +94‎ →‎quality control

28 April 2008

• curprev 18:5918:59, 28 April 2008‎ imported>J. Noel Chiappa‎ m 67,588 bytes 0‎ →‎Comments on general editing guidelines: de-dismember comment
• curprev 15:2115:21, 28 April 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ m 67,588 bytes +67,588‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 15:2015:20, 28 April 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ m 67,578 bytes +720‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 15:1615:16, 28 April 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ m 67,539 bytes +681‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 15:1615:16, 28 April 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ m 67,566 bytes +100‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 15:1015:10, 28 April 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ 67,466 bytes +608‎ →‎quality control: Mission creep most indeed
• curprev 14:0414:04, 28 April 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 66,858 bytes +2,232‎ →‎quality control: thanks for expressing my own thoughts
• curprev 12:5612:56, 28 April 2008‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 66,711 bytes +1,091‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 09:5709:57, 28 April 2008‎ imported>Brian P. Long‎ 65,620 bytes +994‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 01:4201:42, 28 April 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ 64,626 bytes +6,041‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 00:2000:20, 28 April 2008‎ imported>Supten Sarbadhikari‎ 64,257 bytes +5,672‎ →‎quality control

27 April 2008

• curprev 23:2123:21, 27 April 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 64,009 bytes +978‎ →‎quality control: how are we gonna do it, pray tell?
• curprev 22:5822:58, 27 April 2008‎ imported>DavidGoodman‎ 63,031 bytes +1,862‎ →‎quality control
• curprev 11:5311:53, 27 April 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 62,600 bytes +1,431‎ →‎quality control: reply

25 April 2008

• curprev 21:5821:58, 25 April 2008‎ imported>DavidGoodman‎ m 61,169 bytes +165‎ →‎quality control: wording
• curprev 21:4721:47, 25 April 2008‎ imported>DavidGoodman‎ 61,004 bytes +612‎ quality control

28 March 2008

• curprev 22:3022:30, 28 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 60,392 bytes +1,807‎ →‎categories
• curprev 22:2822:28, 28 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 60,264 bytes +303‎ →‎categories
• curprev 22:2222:22, 28 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 59,961 bytes +367‎ →‎categories: good idea, but how is it implemented?
• curprev 18:1718:17, 28 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 59,594 bytes +1,009‎ →‎categories: clarify

27 March 2008

• curprev 21:0721:07, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 59,222 bytes +365‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one
• curprev 19:1019:10, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 58,857 bytes +272‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one
• curprev 19:0819:08, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 58,585 bytes +58,585‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section
• curprev 19:0619:06, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 58,223 bytes +251‎ →‎Calling all experts
• curprev 15:2715:27, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 57,972 bytes +5,751‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one
• curprev 15:2115:21, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 57,740 bytes +5,519‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one: that's a great suggestion!
• curprev 14:5314:53, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 57,542 bytes +239‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one
• curprev 14:5214:52, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 57,426 bytes +123‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one
• curprev 14:5014:50, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 57,303 bytes +150‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one
• curprev 14:3914:39, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 57,153 bytes 0‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one
• curprev 14:3514:35, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 57,153 bytes +2,966‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one
• curprev 14:3414:34, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 57,051 bytes +1,863‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one
• curprev 14:1714:17, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 56,364 bytes +478‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one
• curprev 14:1214:12, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 55,886 bytes +698‎ →‎Subpage tab question
• curprev 14:0414:04, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 55,556 bytes +367‎ →‎Subpage tab question: It's great except the link on the word Recipes should be removed
• curprev 14:0014:00, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 55,189 bytes +1‎ in wrong section
• curprev 13:5713:57, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 55,188 bytes +1,001‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one
• curprev 13:2513:25, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 54,977 bytes +790‎ →‎Another tab question, a more important one: should the link from an item at Recipes go to the article or directly to the recipe, which is now on a subpage?
• curprev 13:1713:17, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ m 54,186 bytes −1‎ →‎Subpage tab question: typo
• curprev 13:1713:17, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 54,187 bytes +1,966‎ →‎Subpage tab question: should we mention the tab in the body of the main article?
• curprev 13:0713:07, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 53,538 bytes +1,317‎ →‎Calling all experts: the more opinions and new views the better, but I don't really think she's going to be able to add much that we haven't already at least considered
• curprev 12:5712:57, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 52,221 bytes +37,001‎ →‎Calling all experts: I think we've got plenty of rules and regs. for the moment
• curprev 10:2010:20, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 51,350 bytes +377‎ →‎Calling all experts
• curprev 10:1610:16, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 50,973 bytes +437‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section
• curprev 10:1310:13, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 50,536 bytes +1,054‎ No edit summary
• curprev 10:0610:06, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 49,482 bytes +310‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section
• curprev 06:5606:56, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 49,188 bytes +16‎ →‎subpage
• curprev 06:5606:56, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 49,172 bytes +2,622‎ →‎categories
• curprev 06:5406:54, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 48,991 bytes +1,553‎ →‎categories
• curprev 06:5306:53, 27 March 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 48,991 bytes +286‎ →‎maybe the Notes section could be edited by all users

24 March 2008

• curprev 12:1012:10, 24 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 48,705 bytes −9‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section: okie, I removed a couple of names in the listings in order to make my intentions clearer; CZ contributor names were never meant to be used for the *real* recipes

23 March 2008

• curprev 18:5918:59, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 48,714 bytes +1,276‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section: James Beard's recipe for bread can be included *if* the instructions are rewritten
• curprev 17:2617:26, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 47,438 bytes +116‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section
• curprev 16:0316:03, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 47,322 bytes +772‎ →‎Improving the general guidelines section
• curprev 16:0016:00, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 46,830 bytes +280‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section
• curprev 15:5715:57, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 46,550 bytes +926‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section
• curprev 15:5215:52, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 46,127 bytes +503‎ →‎first impression of policy
• curprev 14:3214:32, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 45,624 bytes +30,404‎ →‎maybe the Notes section could be edited by all users: new section
• curprev 14:2814:28, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 45,139 bytes +9‎ →‎first impression of policy
• curprev 14:2714:27, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 45,130 bytes +696‎ →‎first impression of policy
• curprev 14:2014:20, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 44,548 bytes +114‎ →‎proposal: find a way for users to have "their own version" of a recipe
• curprev 14:1914:19, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 44,434 bytes +443‎ →‎Improving the general guidelines section
• curprev 14:1714:17, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 44,046 bytes +55‎ →‎Improving the general guidelines section
• curprev 14:1614:16, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 43,991 bytes +8,929‎ →‎Improving the general guidelines section
• curprev 14:1614:16, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 43,992 bytes +114‎ →‎Improving the general guidelines section
• curprev 14:1514:15, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 43,878 bytes +56‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section
• curprev 14:1414:14, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 43,822 bytes +274‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section
• curprev 14:1114:11, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 43,548 bytes +1,536‎ →‎proposal: find a way for users to have "their own version" of a recipe: new section
• curprev 14:0514:05, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 42,691 bytes +679‎ →‎discouraging others from editing - problem for recipes from users who later leave?: new section
• curprev 14:0514:05, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 42,012 bytes +6,950‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section: I think that all recipes are gonna end up in some sort of subpage structure
• curprev 14:0014:00, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 41,006 bytes +588‎ →‎Improving the general guidelines section
• curprev 13:5613:56, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 40,418 bytes +714‎ →‎Improving the general guidelines section: new section
• curprev 13:5313:53, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 39,704 bytes +318‎ →‎improving the "purpose" section: new section
• curprev 13:4813:48, 23 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 39,386 bytes +4,324‎ →‎first impression of policy

22 March 2008

• curprev 23:2323:23, 22 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 38,711 bytes +3,649‎ →‎first impression of policy: Tom, we're talking madness here if we allow anyone and everyone to come in and arbitrarily change 1 tsp to 3 tsp, for instance
• curprev 22:3922:39, 22 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 37,153 bytes +2,091‎ →‎first impression of policy
• curprev 21:4521:45, 22 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 36,224 bytes +1,162‎ →‎first impression of policy: new section
• curprev 21:2721:27, 22 March 2008‎ imported>Tom Kelly‎ 35,683 bytes +621‎ →‎regarding the 1 or 2 different ingredient policy: new section
• curprev 20:2520:25, 22 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 35,062 bytes +19,842‎ →‎To do list

21 March 2008

• curprev 14:2814:28, 21 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 34,806 bytes +176‎ →‎More general guidelines: new section
• curprev 13:1613:16, 21 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 34,637 bytes +7‎ →‎To do list: i think were ok on that part

20 March 2008

• curprev 20:5920:59, 20 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 34,630 bytes +7,149‎ →‎Comments on general editing guidelines: replied to Todd's comment
• curprev 19:4919:49, 20 March 2008‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 34,036 bytes +382‎ →‎Comments on general editing guidelines
• curprev 19:4119:41, 20 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 33,654 bytes +1,466‎ →‎Comments on general editing guidelines
• curprev 12:4812:48, 20 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 32,188 bytes +1,543‎ →‎Comments on general editing guidelines: reply to another of Larry's comments
• curprev 12:3512:35, 20 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 30,645 bytes +2,176‎ →‎Comments on general editing guidelines: added a comment to one of Larry's recent comments
• curprev 12:1812:18, 20 March 2008‎ imported>Robert W King‎ 28,609 bytes +140‎ →‎Comments on general editing guidelines
• curprev 12:1612:16, 20 March 2008‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 28,469 bytes +988‎ →‎Comments on general editing guidelines
• curprev 12:1112:11, 20 March 2008‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 27,481 bytes +12,055‎ →‎Comments on general editing guidelines

18 March 2008

• curprev 21:4421:44, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Robert W King‎ 26,170 bytes +10,744‎ →‎Template discussion
• curprev 21:2621:26, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 26,099 bytes +10,673‎ →‎To do list
• curprev 21:2521:25, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 26,085 bytes +10,659‎ →‎Template discussion: new section
• curprev 21:2421:24, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 18,774 bytes +3,348‎ →‎Comments on general editing guidelines: new section
• curprev 20:5320:53, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 15,426 bytes +206‎ →‎To do list: a good idea
• curprev 20:3420:34, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 15,220 bytes +7,371‎ →‎To do list: new section
• curprev 20:2620:26, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 14,340 bytes +507‎ →‎Links: the article could be anywhere
• curprev 20:1620:16, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 14,166 bytes +333‎ →‎Links
• curprev 20:0720:07, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 13,833 bytes +1,706‎ →‎Links: another suggestion, somewhat lower tech, I fear
• curprev 19:5619:56, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 12,678 bytes +113‎ →‎Should be scholarly
• curprev 15:2915:29, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ m 12,565 bytes +438‎ →‎Links
• curprev 15:2915:29, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ 12,565 bytes +438‎ It'd be awesome if we programmed the wiki to work like NY Times pages
• curprev 14:2514:25, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 12,226 bytes +99‎ →‎Links: ours to obey....
• curprev 14:2014:20, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 12,127 bytes +3,569‎ No edit summary
• curprev 13:2013:20, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 11,829 bytes +1,264‎ →‎Should be scholarly: how about a "Preparation notes" for occasional but VITAL info that may be overlooked if simply incorporated in the recipe?
• curprev 12:5912:59, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 10,565 bytes +2,007‎ →‎Should be scholarly
• curprev 12:0912:09, 18 March 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 10,213 bytes +1,655‎ →‎Should be scholarly: some comments on various headers to be included or not

17 March 2008

• curprev 22:5122:51, 17 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 8,774 bytes +216‎ →‎What next?
• curprev 22:4422:44, 17 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 8,558 bytes +709‎ this page doesn't need the subpages template
• curprev 22:4322:43, 17 March 2008‎ imported>Todd Coles‎ 8,572 bytes +622‎ →‎Should be scholarly

25 February 2008

• curprev 22:4022:40, 25 February 2008‎ imported>Supten Sarbadhikari‎ 7,950 bytes +101‎ →‎Index
• curprev 22:3722:37, 25 February 2008‎ imported>Supten Sarbadhikari‎ 7,849 bytes +7,849‎ →‎Continental
• curprev 22:3322:33, 25 February 2008‎ imported>Supten Sarbadhikari‎ 7,571 bytes +170‎ →‎Should be scholarly

23 February 2008

• curprev 11:5711:57, 23 February 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 7,401 bytes +2,779‎ →‎Should be scholarly: yes, but....
• curprev 11:3811:38, 23 February 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 4,622 bytes +1,211‎ →‎Continental: Well, *I* sure don't know where we're going -- I was hoping that someone else did....
• curprev 11:2911:29, 23 February 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 3,547 bytes +136‎ Calvin Trilling
• curprev 10:1510:15, 23 February 2008‎ imported>Bruce M. Tindall‎ 3,411 bytes +245‎ →‎Continental
• curprev 02:2302:23, 23 February 2008‎ imported>Stephen Ewen‎ 3,166 bytes +3,166‎ Scholarly, not like ''Good Housekeeping''

22 February 2008

• curprev 23:4623:46, 22 February 2008‎ imported>Aleta Curry‎ 2,838 bytes +694‎ →‎Continental: Hayford, when you're right, you're right. And I ain't even a geezer....
• curprev 20:3620:36, 22 February 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 2,144 bytes +1,323‎ →‎Index: some thoughts thereon (NOT, for heaven's sake, proposals!), a can of worms I don't want to open! Hmmm, should there be a recipe for worms?
• curprev 11:2711:27, 22 February 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 821 bytes +821‎ "Continental Cuisine" used to mean something in the States