CZ Talk:History: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This proposal violates what I would regard as a fundamental principle of subpages: nothing should go on a subpage if it can be made into a mainspace article. There is nothing wrong, for example, with having [[history of DNA]] as an article; it ''shouldn't'' be made a subpage of [[DNA]], I think. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:16, 10 September 2007 (CDT) | This proposal violates what I would regard as a fundamental principle of subpages: nothing should go on a subpage if it can be made into a mainspace article. There is nothing wrong, for example, with having [[history of DNA]] as an article; it ''shouldn't'' be made a subpage of [[DNA]], I think. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:16, 10 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Certainly i can see that point too. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 16:56, 10 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:56, 10 September 2007
This proposal violates what I would regard as a fundamental principle of subpages: nothing should go on a subpage if it can be made into a mainspace article. There is nothing wrong, for example, with having history of DNA as an article; it shouldn't be made a subpage of DNA, I think. --Larry Sanger 09:16, 10 September 2007 (CDT)