CZ Talk:Food Science Workgroup: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Thomas E Kelly |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I don't know much about culinary arts & science, but it sounds plausible to me. I think we need the opinion of some chefs and some food scientists. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 16:08, 2 April 2007 (CDT) | I don't know much about culinary arts & science, but it sounds plausible to me. I think we need the opinion of some chefs and some food scientists. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 16:08, 2 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:how do we going about finding chefs and food scientists? put up a flyer? :) [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 17:55, 2 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:55, 2 April 2007
I think Culinary Arts is needed. Food Science is just that, and concentrates on safe and nutritious food. Or it could be called Culinary Arts & Science, so it includes Food Science and Culinary Arts. But yes, we need this workgroup! Nancy Sculerati 23:57, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
The mailing list for the Editorial Council is set up...a high priority for me is to start using it, and this can be one of our first topics. --Larry Sanger 00:13, 31 March 2007 (CDT)
I like Culinary arts and science. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 22:39, 31 March 2007 (CDT)
Culinary Arts & Science sounds better...that would encompass other important aspects of food and cuisine. --Kelly Patterson 01:08, 1 April 2007 (CDT)
Need input on Workgroup Name change to Culinary Arts & Science!
I don't know much about culinary arts & science, but it sounds plausible to me. I think we need the opinion of some chefs and some food scientists. --Larry Sanger 16:08, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
- how do we going about finding chefs and food scientists? put up a flyer? :) -Tom Kelly (Talk) 17:55, 2 April 2007 (CDT)