CZ Talk:Definitions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger (Should we be linking within definitions? Perhaps not) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Question: should we either encourage or disallow links within definition templates? Links might be distracting; but they also might be useful. I don't know what to think... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:59, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | Question: should we either encourage or disallow links within definition templates? Links might be distracting; but they also might be useful. I don't know what to think... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:59, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
On the above: see [[United Kingdom/Related]] where there are liberal amounts of linking. The links make the definitions very hard to read; and they also seem to be distracting from the main attraction, which are the articles linked to. I'm inclined to think we shouldn't be linking within definitions. What do you think? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:49, 22 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:49, 22 July 2007
Question: should we either encourage or disallow links within definition templates? Links might be distracting; but they also might be useful. I don't know what to think... --Larry Sanger 22:59, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
On the above: see United Kingdom/Related where there are liberal amounts of linking. The links make the definitions very hard to read; and they also seem to be distracting from the main attraction, which are the articles linked to. I'm inclined to think we shouldn't be linking within definitions. What do you think? --Larry Sanger 08:49, 22 July 2007 (CDT)