CZ Talk:Article-specific subpages: Difference between revisions
imported>Barry R. Smith (Proofs subpage topic created) |
imported>David Yamakuchi m (→Proofs Subpage) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[User:Barry R. Smith|Barry R. Smith]] 16:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Barry R. Smith|Barry R. Smith]] 16:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
:It seemed to me that the forum discussion you are referring to was intended for the "official" subpages, rather than the "Article-specific subpages". These (Article-specific subpages) seemed to me like they were supposed to be more organic in nature, with unwanted/unused ones simply never becoming "official"...and more popular ones eventually being discussed and adopted (or not).[[User:David Yamakuchi|David Yamakuchi]] 00:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:03, 14 May 2010
Proofs Subpage
I just noticed the new "Proofs" subpage. I did a little searching on CZ and the forums, but coudn't find any discussion about this. Did I miss such a discussion? The description says: "For (mathematical) proofs which are neither suitable for the main article, nor a /Tutorial or /Student Level subpage". Is there some reason why a standard /Advanced subpage would not be suitable for such material? I understand that other types of material might be on an /Advanced subpage, while /Proofs is more specific, and so perhaps better. But it seems to me that some serious discussion should occur before this subpage is adopted across a wide range of pages. For instance, what is suitable for /Tutorial, what is suitable for /Student Level, what is suitable for a main article, and what does not fall under any of these?
Barry R. Smith 16:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- It seemed to me that the forum discussion you are referring to was intended for the "official" subpages, rather than the "Article-specific subpages". These (Article-specific subpages) seemed to me like they were supposed to be more organic in nature, with unwanted/unused ones simply never becoming "official"...and more popular ones eventually being discussed and adopted (or not).David Yamakuchi 00:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)