CZ:Proposals/Unified Feature-Rich Workgroup page design template: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert W King
(New page: {{proposal assignment}} '''Driver:''' Robert King == Complete explanation == Many workgroup pages are either extremely well developed, somewhat developed, or not d...)
 
imported>Robert W King
Line 12: Line 12:
* Polling to determine elements
* Polling to determine elements


This is only about appearance, and not necessarily about trackers, or data.
This is only about appearance, and not necessarily about trackers, or data
 
Most of this idea is inspired by [[User:David_E._Volk|David's]] work on the [[Chemistry style guide]] and the [[CZ:Howto]] page.


== Reasoning ==
== Reasoning ==

Revision as of 12:30, 1 April 2008

This proposal has not yet been assigned to any decisionmaking group or decisionmaker(s).
The Proposals Manager will do so soon if and when the proposal or issue is "well formed" (including having a driver).
For now, the proposal record can be found in the new proposals queue.


Driver: Robert King

Complete explanation

Many workgroup pages are either extremely well developed, somewhat developed, or not developed at all. The situation could be broadly improved if a unified feature-rich design template were used on each Workgroup page.

The following outline probably indicates what is necessary to make this happen:

  • Discussion and community agreement upon use
  • Total community input on the value and components of such a system (appearance, looks, features, what is important and what's not)
  • Polling to determine elements

This is only about appearance, and not necessarily about trackers, or data.

Most of this idea is inspired by David's work on the Chemistry style guide and the CZ:Howto page.

Reasoning

There are several justifications for this. One is to increase the visibility of each workgroup page collectively, and to enhance their functionality. This would be a benefit to all workgroups across the board.

Two, a better appearance and streamlined homepage might enable more participation within workgroups.


Implementation

Actual implementation would be pretty easy from a cosmetic perspective.

Discussion

Please discuss here!

Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only)

Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):