CZ:Proposals/Simplify Core Articles Initiative: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
(Anyone want to drive this? I'm kind of excited about this...)
 
imported>Larry Sanger
(→‎Complete explanation: excising amphiboly ;-))
Line 6: Line 6:
(The following should be either replaced or heavily edited by the driver.)  A ''complete'' explanation would consist of a complete rewriting of the rules on [[CZ:Core Articles]].  However, a properly simplified and attractive version of those rules could be very short and therefore not too hard to write.  Here are some ideas:
(The following should be either replaced or heavily edited by the driver.)  A ''complete'' explanation would consist of a complete rewriting of the rules on [[CZ:Core Articles]].  However, a properly simplified and attractive version of those rules could be very short and therefore not too hard to write.  Here are some ideas:
* Get rid of the point system.  Or make it one point, one article.
* Get rid of the point system.  Or make it one point, one article.
* Give people credit for two paragraph long stubs.
* Give people credit for two-paragraph-long stubs.
* Anyone may write his or her name next to an article to "take credit for starting it."  This is not done by any editor or Core Articles Coordinator.
* Anyone may write his or her name next to an article to "take credit for starting it."  This is not done by any editor or Core Articles Coordinator.
* Get rid of the "stages" system.  That means getting rid of the notion of "blessing" the list.  ''Anyone'' can edit the article list, although as before, editors should enjoy extra latitude in refining the lists in their areas of expertise.
* Get rid of the "stages" system.  That means getting rid of the notion of "blessing" the list.  ''Anyone'' can edit the article list, although as before, editors should enjoy extra latitude in refining the lists in their areas of expertise.

Revision as of 21:07, 21 March 2008

This proposal has not yet been assigned to any decisionmaking group or decisionmaker(s).
The Proposals Manager will do so soon if and when the proposal or issue is "well formed" (including having a driver).
For now, the proposal record can be found in the new proposals queue.


Driver: (please specify, if any)

Complete explanation

(The following should be either replaced or heavily edited by the driver.) A complete explanation would consist of a complete rewriting of the rules on CZ:Core Articles. However, a properly simplified and attractive version of those rules could be very short and therefore not too hard to write. Here are some ideas:

  • Get rid of the point system. Or make it one point, one article.
  • Give people credit for two-paragraph-long stubs.
  • Anyone may write his or her name next to an article to "take credit for starting it." This is not done by any editor or Core Articles Coordinator.
  • Get rid of the "stages" system. That means getting rid of the notion of "blessing" the list. Anyone can edit the article list, although as before, editors should enjoy extra latitude in refining the lists in their areas of expertise.
  • Make the list a list of all the top articles on a subject, not just the ones created after a certain date. Bonus: Core Articles becomes an excellent starting-point for the most important articles about the most important topics.
  • Open up the miscellaneous category to augmentation and organization ad nauseam by anyone.
  • Redo the points page.
  • Install a new Core Articles Coordinator who will post the latest points on Citizendium-L on a weekly basis, and generally act as cheerleader for the effort.

Reasoning

The reasoning behind the proposal, or behind the various options offered in the issue. Make sure it is clear what problem you're trying to solve (or opportunity you're trying to leverage), and the proposal would solve the problem.

Implementation

A practical "to do list" type explanation of how the proposal will be implemented, and who will implement it. If there is no one to implement the proposal (as, for example, with many technical or recruitment proposals), then it is automatically declined.

Discussion

A discussion section, to which anyone may contribute.


Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only)

Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):