CZ:Proposals/New: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
imported>Larry Sanger
(Moved Simplifying and improving CZ guidance pages to Exec. Comm.)
Line 29: Line 29:


If a proposal here does not have a "driver," it may be moved to [[CZ:Proposals/Driverless|the driverless proposals queue]] a week after being proposed.
If a proposal here does not have a "driver," it may be moved to [[CZ:Proposals/Driverless|the driverless proposals queue]] a week after being proposed.


== Internationalisation sandbox ==
== Internationalisation sandbox ==
Line 43: Line 39:
|Target date for next step =  
|Target date for next step =  
|Notes =  There is a forum called Internationlization.  Or Internationalisation.  Something like that.  There is also a page on the wiki on which people are to enter the languages they are fluent in besides English.  I would direct you to it if I could.
|Notes =  There is a forum called Internationlization.  Or Internationalisation.  Something like that.  There is also a page on the wiki on which people are to enter the languages they are fluent in besides English.  I would direct you to it if I could.
}}
== Simplifying and improving CZ guidance pages ==
{{proposal
|Brief descriptive title = Approval system for CZ: pages
|Summary of proposal = Briefly, we have a logjam. The guidance pages are important and often sensitive, but need simplifying and improving. This intimidates editors (fear of introducing an error). I propose that we have an Approved version of all CZ pages, and a Draft version that is clearly open to all suggestions and contributions. The Approval process should be as that for other articles, except that the relevantly qualified "editors" are the Executive Committee. |Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 07:08, 14 February 2008 (CST)
|Username of driver = [[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 04:02, 15 February 2008 (CST)
|Next step = Get comments from community; if general approval from Executive committee then implement
|Target date for next step = 20 February
|Notes = 
}}
}}



Revision as of 14:01, 15 February 2008

Instructions

To start a new proposal or issue, simply copy the template below, click the edit link above, paste the copied template into the text box at the bottom underneath the other proposals, fill out the details in the template, and press save! That's it--it's very easy. (Hint: you might want to open a copy of this page in a new window, so you can see the instructions as you fill out the template.) Here's the template:

== Brief descriptive title ==
{{proposal
|Brief descriptive title = ADD TITLE HERE
|Summary of proposal =
|Name and date of original proposer = 
|Username of driver = 
|Next step = 
|Target date for next step = 
|Notes =  
}}

Here's how to fill it out:

  1. Brief descriptive title. Make this brief, because it will be part of a page title. If you are raising an issue (ask for a decision among two or more options), please word the title as a question. Note, this goes in the == Heading ==, too.
  2. Summary of proposal. Limited to 100 words.
  3. Name and date of original proposer: write four tildes ~~~~
  4. Username of driver. If you, write three tildes ~~~; if someone else, specify. This is the person who makes sure the proposal moves along from step to step in its development. If the "driver" is left blank, and no one volunteers to be driver, your proposal may be moved to the "discarded" queue. The driver should get familiar with the proposals system policy page.
  5. Next step. The next thing you need to do to move the proposal toward reality. Not sure what to write? Hints here.
  6. Target date for next step. A date the driver commits to, for completing the next step. If you drop the ball, the proposal may become driverless.
  7. (Optional) Notes. Brief salient remarks. Bear in mind the bulk of the info about the proposal doesn't go here but on the (much bigger) proposal page. A handy link to the proposal page will pop up after you save the template.

Optional next step for proposers. This is optional, and you can leave it to the driver. Follow the "complete proposal" link you'll find at the bottom of your new proposal box. On that page, you can elaborate the proposal or issue, link to pre-existing discussions, and generally say whatever you think needs to be said in order to get the proposal adopted (or the issue decided) and implemented. That's generally where to follow the progress of your proposal. (Guidelines are available.)

New proposals

Looking for your proposal, which used to be here? Check the recently moved proposals page.

If a proposal here does not have a "driver," it may be moved to the driverless proposals queue a week after being proposed.

Internationalisation sandbox

Summary: There have been many requests for CZ pilots to begin in other languages, but so far nothing has gotten off the ground. Inasmuch as 1) we are losing competent authors whose first language is not English but 2) we do not have the time, personnel or expertise to begin complete CZs in other languages, I propose a sandbox type setup in which those who will can go ahead and begin articles in other languages, but these will be hidden from public view until a bona fide project can be set up in that language. Note that unlike the "sandbox" we have now, these drafts would not be discarded when the user signs off.
Original proposer: Aleta Curry 21:10, 13 February 2008 (CST) Next step: Fill in next step
Driver: Driver needed (i.e., someone familiar with the proposals system who will move it through the system) To be done by: Fill in target date for next step
Notes: There is a forum called Internationlization. Or Internationalisation. Something like that. There is also a page on the wiki on which people are to enter the languages they are fluent in besides English. I would direct you to it if I could.
Complete proposal


Involving authors in approvals

Summary: There are two aspects: 1) I see no reason why anyone should not feel able to nominate an article for approval (even their own article). Indeed I see every reason why all contributors to Citizendium should feel encouraged to read articles with potential approval in mind.

2) To approve articles requires the support of relevant editors. But I see no reason why authors should not also be able (and indeed be encouraged) to express their support or otherwise for approval, and indeed as Citizendium values fluency and style then the opinions of non-expert readers are very important too.

Original proposer: Gareth Leng 07:57, 14 February 2008 (CST) Next step: Get feedback. If no significant objection from Executive committee, implement changes
Driver: Gareth Leng 04:01, 15 February 2008 (CST) To be done by: 20 February
Complete proposal


Naming Conventions for Biographies

Summary: to adopt conventions for the naming of articles about people, living and dead. The basic principle proposed is: In general, an article about a person ought to live at the name at which the person is best-known to educated English-speaking people, with redirects from all common alternates. Significant levels of detail are offered.
Original proposer: Anthony Argyriou 14:31, 14 February 2008 (CST) Next step: uncertain
Driver: Anthony Argyriou To be done by: Fill in target date for next step
Notes: originally proposed at CZ Talk:Naming Conventions#Names of articles about people, with no response.
Complete proposal


Adopt the proposals system

Summary: The Citizendium should adopt the proposals system as current set out on CZ:Proposals and its subpages. We Citizens can and should participate in our own governance. We Citizens often offer ideas for improvements (proposals) and make calls for a decision to be made between definite options (issues). Notice that we do distinguish between proposals and issues, but, below, we'll sometimes use "proposal" to mean "either a proposal or an issue." The proposals system is a single place where Citizens may make proposals and raise issues. If you submit a proposal here, and it gains a champion (a "driver"), you can be sure that the community will respond; your ideas or your question will not simply fall through the cracks. (Read further on CZ:Proposals.)
Original proposer: Larry Sanger 19:58, 14 February 2008 (CST) Next step: Get comments; if no significant objection from Exec. Comm. and community, consider finished.
Driver: Larry Sanger To be done by: Tuesday, Feb. 19
Notes: And yes...I am using the system to confirm the system...circularity alert! But stand back, I'm an Expert about this. (I wrote my dissertation about an analogous kind of circularity.)
Complete proposal


Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only)

Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):