CZ:Proposals/New: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King |
imported>Ro Thorpe No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==History | ==History naming conventions== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*I think most people would type in [[History of France]], so that should be the style. Of course they could also go to [[France]] first, and there would be the required link. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 14:24, 9 February 2008 (CST) - And so it is. As for 'French history', I think most people would not choose it, a bit informal. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 14:27, 9 February 2008 (CST) | *I think most people would type in [[History of France]], so that should be the style. Of course they could also go to [[France]] first, and there would be the required link. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 14:24, 9 February 2008 (CST) - And so it is. As for 'French history', I think most people would not choose it, a bit informal. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 14:27, 9 February 2008 (CST) | ||
*'''Questions:''' are we limiting this discussion to places, like [[History of France]], or does it also extend to things, like [[History of the kilt]]? If yes, why? Why should we limit this to the history workgroup? Why not make one rule for the whole of Citizendium? Would people actually search for [[Kilt, history]] or [[History of the kilt]]? And why should we limit ourselves to the old-fashioned way of keeping tab of books in a library, where people search for books in little drawers of cards by the first word according to the Dewey Decimal system? Isn't this an internet site? Don't we have redirects? --[[User:Christian Liem|Christian Liem]] 20:42, 9 February 2008 (CST) | *'''Questions:''' are we limiting this discussion to places, like [[History of France]], or does it also extend to things, like [[History of the kilt]]? If yes, why? Why should we limit this to the history workgroup? Why not make one rule for the whole of Citizendium? Would people actually search for [[Kilt, history]] or [[History of the kilt]]? And why should we limit ourselves to the old-fashioned way of keeping tab of books in a library, where people search for books in little drawers of cards by the first word according to the Dewey Decimal system? Isn't this an internet site? Don't we have redirects? --[[User:Christian Liem|Christian Liem]] 20:42, 9 February 2008 (CST) | ||
:Well, if I wanted a history of the kilt, I'd probably just type in 'kilt' & be happy if there were immediately visible a link to 'history of the kilt', or, for that matter 'kilt, history'. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 11:55, 10 February 2008 (CST) | |||
==Improve general heading== | ==Improve general heading== | ||
Revision as of 12:55, 10 February 2008
History naming conventions
Summary: Please edit your proposal record and provide a summary.
| ||||
| To the proposer: please read the proposals system policy page if you want to fill out a complete proposal, not just this summary. If you don't, please ask around for someone (a "driver") to take over your proposal! Start complete proposal | ||||
- I think most people would type in History of France, so that should be the style. Of course they could also go to France first, and there would be the required link. Ro Thorpe 14:24, 9 February 2008 (CST) - And so it is. As for 'French history', I think most people would not choose it, a bit informal. Ro Thorpe 14:27, 9 February 2008 (CST)
- Questions: are we limiting this discussion to places, like History of France, or does it also extend to things, like History of the kilt? If yes, why? Why should we limit this to the history workgroup? Why not make one rule for the whole of Citizendium? Would people actually search for Kilt, history or History of the kilt? And why should we limit ourselves to the old-fashioned way of keeping tab of books in a library, where people search for books in little drawers of cards by the first word according to the Dewey Decimal system? Isn't this an internet site? Don't we have redirects? --Christian Liem 20:42, 9 February 2008 (CST)
- Well, if I wanted a history of the kilt, I'd probably just type in 'kilt' & be happy if there were immediately visible a link to 'history of the kilt', or, for that matter 'kilt, history'. Ro Thorpe 11:55, 10 February 2008 (CST)
Improve general heading
| Reason: Please use the proposal template. Remove the HTML comment code once this has been completed. |
Please reformat the proposal clearly, briefly, and using the {{Proposal}} template.
|
| Proposal editor: --Robert W King 08:35, 10 February 2008 (CST) |
Make "beta" tag a real tag
| Reason: Please use the proposal template. Remove the HTML comment code when this has been done. |
Please reformat the proposal clearly, briefly, and using the {{Proposal}} template.
|
| Proposal editor: --Robert W King 08:37, 10 February 2008 (CST) |
User feedback
Summary: Please edit your proposal record and provide a summary.
| ||||
| To the proposer: please read the proposals system policy page if you want to fill out a complete proposal, not just this summary. If you don't, please ask around for someone (a "driver") to take over your proposal! Start complete proposal | ||||
Warren Schudy 13:34, 9 February 2008 (CST)
| Response |
| By: --Denis Cavanagh 14:27, 9 February 2008 (CST) |
| I think its a good idea as long as its technically feasible. |