CZ:Proposals/Approval and Feedback: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Warren Schudy
Line 5: Line 5:
{{proposal
{{proposal
|Brief descriptive title = Enable external feedback
|Brief descriptive title = Enable external feedback
|Summary of proposal = Each article should have a link for non-citizens to submit feedback. Feedback can be read and acted upon by any Citizen. To make the feedback system easier to use for both readers and Citizens, feedback can be in the form of a machine-readable proposed edit.
|Summary of proposal = Each article should have a link for non-citizens to submit feedback. Feedback can be read and acted upon by any Citizen. Feedback can be read both in an additional tab for each cluster, as well as in a global queue similar to "recent changes".
|Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 13:34, 9 February 2008 (CST)
|Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 13:34, 9 February 2008 (CST)
|Username of driver = [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]]
|Username of driver = [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]]
|Next step = Ensure proposal page summarizes community views
|Next step = Run straw poll to decide approved articles vs. all articles issue
|Target date for next step = Feb 20
|Target date for next step = Feb 25
|Notes =  
|Notes =  
}}
}}

Revision as of 09:26, 20 February 2008

These are proposals that will go (or are now) before the Approval and Feedback group.

Enable external feedback

Summary: Each article should have a link for non-citizens to submit feedback. Feedback can be read and acted upon by any Citizen. Feedback can be read both in an additional tab for each cluster, as well as in a global queue similar to "recent changes".
Original proposer: Warren Schudy 13:34, 9 February 2008 (CST) Next step: Run straw poll to decide approved articles vs. all articles issue
Driver: Warren Schudy To be done by: Feb 25
Complete proposal


Involving authors in approvals

Summary: There are two aspects: 1) I see no reason why anyone should not feel able to nominate an article for approval (even their own article). Indeed I see every reason why all contributors to Citizendium should feel encouraged to read articles with potential approval in mind.

2) To approve articles requires the support of relevant editors. But I see no reason why authors should not also be able (and indeed be encouraged) to express their support or otherwise for approval, and indeed as Citizendium values fluency and style then the opinions of non-expert readers are very important too.

Original proposer: Gareth Leng 07:57, 14 February 2008 (CST) Next step: Get feedback
Driver: Gareth Leng 04:01, 15 February 2008 (CST) To be done by: 20 February
Complete proposal


Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only)

Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):