CZ:Charter drafting committee: Difference between revisions
imported>Joe Quick (Undo revision by Drew R. Smith It should be "last". We only wait for twenty nominations if they haven't already been made by the deadline.) |
imported>Brian P. Long (attempt to discuss the topic of direct editing) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
==The Role of the Editor in Chief== | ==The Role of the Editor in Chief== | ||
The Editor in Chief will occupy a unique position in the drafting of the Charter. He will not be a member of the drafting committee per se but will be directly engaged in the process. He will be the only person not on the drafting committee allowed to write on the discussion page of the drafting committee. | The Editor in Chief will occupy a unique position in the drafting of the Charter. He will not be a member of the drafting committee per se but will be directly engaged in the process. He will be the only person not on the drafting committee allowed to write on the discussion page of the drafting committee. Because the Charter is the expression of the ideals and goals of our community, the Editor in Chief will not be allowed to directly edit the text of the Charter while it is being drafted. (This gesture should by no means suggest that the Editor in Chief is unwelcome to propose language for the Charter on the discussion page.) | ||
==Next step== | ==Next step== | ||
After the initial draft has been completed, the drafting committee's job will be done and members of the drafting committee will not be afforded any privileges above those of other members. Changes will be allowed in the text of the draft but only following broad agreement among the majority of discussants in the forums. Following 4 weeks of open discussion, if all major points of discussion have been addressed, the text of the draft will be locked and the draft will be put to a popular vote for confirmation. | After the initial draft has been completed, the drafting committee's job will be done and members of the drafting committee will not be afforded any privileges above those of other members. Changes will be allowed in the text of the draft but only following broad agreement among the majority of discussants in the forums. Following 4 weeks of open discussion, if all major points of discussion have been addressed, the text of the draft will be locked and the draft will be put to a popular vote for confirmation. | ||
Revision as of 23:47, 18 August 2009
A community-elected delegation of citizens will be tasked with drafting the initial draft of the Citizendium charter. Following the release of the initial draft, the committee's work will be done and all other citizens will be encouraged to propose modifications, additions, deletions. This will allow for a more expeditious drafting process and still allow input from all Citizendium members.
Delegates
Delegates will be chosen by popular election. Throughout, the process will be highly publicized so as to involve as many members as possible.
Nomination
Candidates will be nominated by the community. Any member of Citizendium may nominate up to 5 other citizens to be candidates for election to the committee by adding a new row to the table below. No member may nominate himself/herself. Members who have been nominated may accept or decline by replacing the text in the appropriate box with four tildes (~~~~) and deleting the text in the other box. The nomination period will close 2 weeks after the formal start date or when a minimum of 20 nominations have been submitted, whichever comes last.
| Nominee | Nominated by | Accept | Decline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Name | (accept) | (decline) |
Election
Elections will follow the period allowed for nominations. This period will also last 2 weeks from the official start date. Candidates will not be allowed to campaign but publicity of the process will remain active. Each citizen will be allowed to cast five votes but may not cast more than one for a single candidate and is not required to use all five possible votes. At the end of the voting period, the 8 candidates who receive the most votes will be officially installed on the drafting committee. In the case of a tie, up to ten delegates will be admitted to the committee. If a tie would result in more than ten delegates, a runoff election will be held for all nominees who received enough votes to be seated as delegates.
Drafting period
The drafting committee will be allowed 4 weeks to complete an initial draft before it is opened up for public proposals. Drafting will take place on the wiki but only delegates to the drafting committee will be allowed to make edits. The talk page will be reserved for delegates while other discussion should be directed to a special section of the forums dedicated to the charter. During the 4 week drafting period, committee members will be allowed to consult other members or even non-citizens. Other citizens may also make suggestions and engage in discussion in the forums. Delegates may engage that discussion if they wish but will not be required to address every comment.
The Role of the Editor in Chief
The Editor in Chief will occupy a unique position in the drafting of the Charter. He will not be a member of the drafting committee per se but will be directly engaged in the process. He will be the only person not on the drafting committee allowed to write on the discussion page of the drafting committee. Because the Charter is the expression of the ideals and goals of our community, the Editor in Chief will not be allowed to directly edit the text of the Charter while it is being drafted. (This gesture should by no means suggest that the Editor in Chief is unwelcome to propose language for the Charter on the discussion page.)
Next step
After the initial draft has been completed, the drafting committee's job will be done and members of the drafting committee will not be afforded any privileges above those of other members. Changes will be allowed in the text of the draft but only following broad agreement among the majority of discussants in the forums. Following 4 weeks of open discussion, if all major points of discussion have been addressed, the text of the draft will be locked and the draft will be put to a popular vote for confirmation.