CZ:Article mechanics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<center>'''This is a policy summary.  [[CZ:Article Mechanics Complete|The complete document is here]].'''</center>
<center>'''This is a policy summary.  [[CZ:Article Mechanics Complete|The complete document is here]].'''</center>
{{TOC-right}}
{{TOC-right}}
[[Citizendium]] aims to build a body of [[CZ:Articles|articles]] that cover, at a general level, every aspect of their topics.  Their purpose is to ''introduce'' the topic in an accessible way that is at the same time authoritative. An article is not a mere summary or list of information, but a connected piece of prose, meant to be read all the way through. Articles must be selective and simplified in the information they present, but this does not mean that they need be ''brief''; they should say what they need to as clearly as possible, in a concise and interesting way.
[[Citizendium]] aims to build a body of [[CZ:Articles|articles]] that cover, at a general level, every aspect of their topics.  Their purpose is to ''introduce'' the topic in an accessible way that is at the same time authoritative. An article is not a mere summary or list of information, but a connected piece of prose, meant to be read all the way through. Articles must be selective in the information they present, but need not be ''brief''; they should say what they need to as clearly as possible, in a concise and interesting way.


==Opening section==
==Opening section==
The opening section should ''always'' be introductory, and needs no heading; so for example the heading "Introduction" is redundant and unnecessary. The first paragraph usually begins with a definition or a description of the topic, and we '''bold''' the title of the article in the first sentence.  (e.g., '''Philosophy,''' both the field and the concept, is notoriously hard to define.).  The first paragraph should contain a concise and neutral answer to "Why is this topic important (or interesting)?" If the topic is a person, say what the person is best known for; if an event, summarize its impact; if a place, describe things that make it notable. The rest of the opening section should try to tie together the entire article into a cohesive whole, and give the background that is needed for understanding the rest of the article. The opening section can be a ‘’summary’’ of the information found in the article, but this is not necessarily the best use of the space.  A brief outline of the article structure is preferable to a summary when the article is very long.
The opening section should ''always'' be introductory, and needs no heading; so the heading "Introduction" is redundant and unnecessary. The first paragraph usually begins with a definition or a description of the topic, and we '''bold''' the title of the article in the first sentence.  (e.g., '''Philosophy,''' both the field and the concept, is notoriously hard to define.).  The first paragraph should contain a concise and neutral answer to "Why is this topic important (or interesting)?" If the topic is a person, say what the person is best known for; if an event, summarize its impact; if a place, describe things that make it notable. The rest of the opening section should give the background needed for understanding the rest of the article. The opening section can be a ‘’summary’’ of the information in the article, but this may not be the best use of the space.  A brief outline of the article structure is preferable to a summary when the article is very long.


== The article body ==
== The article body ==
Generally, articles need a plan which lends coherence and flow and invites readers to keep reading. A central task of editors is to help plan articles, and, for complex articles, the plan should be discussed on the article's Talk page. In general, information that is most important, fundamental, or earliest should be presented first.  Major achievements of individuals should be presented before minor ones; the basic tenets of a theory before derivative ones; earlier events before later ones.
Generally, articles need a plan which lends coherence and flow and invites readers to keep reading. A task of editors is to help plan articles, and, for complex articles, the plan should be discussed on the Talk page. Major achievements of individuals should be presented before minor ones; the basic tenets of a theory before derivative ones; earlier events before later ones.


=== Section titles ===
=== Section titles ===
Section headings help both readers and authors, but too many can be ugly and distracting. A plethora of headings is not necessary in a well-organized narrative, such as [http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Biology&oldid=100047130 this "Biology" article].
Section headings help both readers and authors, but too many can be ugly and distracting. An example of a well-organized narrative is [http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Biology&oldid=100047130 this "Biology" article].


=== Standardized information ===
=== Standardized information ===
Line 32: Line 32:
===Related Articles subpage===
===Related Articles subpage===


This page allows connecting each article with other related articles and offers greater insight into the underlying conceptual structure of the encyclopedia as well. Related Articles subpages generally are organized into a small number of Parent Topics, which are broader, or more general topics within which the current article is located; Subtopics, which are key aspects or facets of the topic discussed in the main article worth separate and further discussion; and Related Topics are various "close tangents" which take the discussion off in new but related directions. Thus, for example, the article on [[World War I]] includes Parent Topics on [[War]] and [[Nationalism]], Subtopics including famous battles such as [[Galipoli]], [[Verdun]] and the [[Somme]], and Related Articles on [[Trench warfare]], [[Mustard gas]], and others.
This page allows connecting each article with other related articles and offers greater insight into the underlying conceptual structure of the encyclopedia. Related Articles subpages generally are organized into a few Parent Topics, which are more general topics within which the current article is located; Subtopics, which are aspects of the main topic worth separate discussion; and Related Topics are "close tangents" which take the discussion off in new but related directions. Thus, for example, the article on [[World War I]] includes Parent Topics on [[War]] and [[Nationalism]], Subtopics including famous battles such as [[Galipoli]], [[Verdun]] and the [[Somme]], and Related Articles on [[Trench warfare]], [[Mustard gas]], and others.


=== Bibliography subpage===
=== Bibliography subpage===
Line 38: Line 38:
''See [[CZ:Bibliography]] for more detailed coverage.''
''See [[CZ:Bibliography]] for more detailed coverage.''


This is an annotated bibliography: books, articles, editions and other material that, in the opinion of ''Citizendium'' authors represent the most important, and useful texts, clarifying why an item is listed ("one of the most commonly used texts in this field"; "the paper which originally defined the concept"). For example, historical topics should list and annotate the leading published sources for information on a topic, and articles about authors should have a list of major works. If all or part of an item is available online, the annotation should indicate where and if possible provide the link. (Here are the [[CZ:Citation templates|citation templates]].)
This is an annotated bibliography: books, articles, editions and other material that, in the opinion of ''Citizendium'' authors represent important and useful texts, clarifying why an item is listed ("one of the most commonly used texts in this field"; "the paper which originally defined the concept"). For example, historical topics should list and annotate the leading sources for information on a topic, and articles about authors should have a list of major works. If an item is available online, the annotation should indicate where and provide the link. (Here are the [[CZ:Citation templates|citation templates]].)


Long complicated articles can have a long, complicated bibliography page. They should also have a "Suggested reading" section at the end of the main article that presents 5-10 publications that are most suitable for beginners on the topic, especially if they are on the web, or available at the average library.   
Long complicated articles can have a long bibliography page. They may also have a "Suggested reading" section at the end of the main article that presents 5-10 publications suitable for beginners, especially if they are on the web.   


Publications cited in the footnotes can also be included in the bibliography. Unpublished materials and archival sources are generally not included in the Bibliography unless they are accessible online.
How to write annotations is discussed by the [http://www.loc.gov/nls/other/annotation/revised/creating%20an%20annotation%20(without%20title%20page).pdf Library of Congress publication ''Creating an Annotation''.]
 
How to write annotations is discussed at length by the [http://www.loc.gov/nls/other/annotation/revised/creating%20an%20annotation%20(without%20title%20page).pdf Library of Congress publication ''Creating an Annotation''.]


=== External Links subpage===
=== External Links subpage===
Line 54: Line 52:
=== Optional subpages ===
=== Optional subpages ===


In addition to these three standard subpages, there are a large number of additional subpages that may be included with an article. The full current list of subpages includes Works, Discography, Filmography, Catalogs, Timelines, Gallery (Images), Audio and Video pages, Computer Code, Tutorials, Student-level discussions, Signed Article, Function, Addendum, Debate Guide, Advanced and Recipes.
A large number of additional subpages may be included with an article. The full current list of subpages includes Works, Discography, Filmography, Catalogs, Timelines, Gallery (Images), Audio and Video pages, Computer Code, Tutorials, Student-level discussions, Signed Article, Function, Addendum, Debate Guide, Advanced and Recipes.


== Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and usage ==
== Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and usage ==
Line 65: Line 63:
== Miscellaneous style guidelines ==
== Miscellaneous style guidelines ==


Craft articles for maximum readability. Many topics may be impossible for a non-specialist fully to understand; our task is to write at the university level, but if a difficult or advanced piece of text ''can'' be written in a way to make it more accessible to educated nonspecialists, then it ''should'' be. Professionals are often accused of writing jargon that is decipherable only by people in their fields; our task is to "translate" the jargon, so far as is possible, into elegant prose.
Craft articles for maximum readability. Many topics may be impossible for a non-specialist fully to understand; our task is to write at the university level, but if a difficult or advanced piece of text ''can'' be written to make it more accessible to nonspecialists, then it ''should'' be. Professionals are often accused of writing jargon that is decipherable only by people in their fields; our task is to "translate" the jargon into elegant prose.


=== Write lively prose, not "encyclopedese" ===
=== Write lively prose, not "encyclopedese" ===
Writing an encyclopedia brings out a tendency in some writers to make prose dull--perhaps  the influence of boring encyclopedia articles we read as children.  But our writing needn't be like that; we can, and should, give our prose personality.
Writing an encyclopedia brings out a tendency in some writers to make prose dull--perhaps  the influence of boring encyclopedia articles we read as children.  But we can, and should, give our prose personality.


Many writers today have taken William Strunk's pithy injunction, [http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk5.html#13 "Omit needless words,"] to heart.  Tightening up flabby verbiage is one of the most ''needful'' improvements we can make, '''but''' we must not denature our prose entirely: we want our writing to be readable, not encyclopedese.
Many writers today have taken William Strunk's pithy injunction, [http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk5.html#13 "Omit needless words,"] to heart.  Tightening up flabby verbiage is one of the most ''needful'' improvements we can make, '''but''' we must not denature our prose entirely: we want our writing to be readable, not encyclopedese.


Another common stylistic rule would have us use simple Anglo-Saxon words rather than hifalutin, impressive-sounding words, '''but''' this does not mean that we should prefer a merely adequate word to a really apt word just because the apt word is a bit more obscure. Choose the familiar word rather than the obscure word, but also the precise word rather than the loose word, while avoiding pedantry.
Another common stylistic rule would have us use simple Anglo-Saxon words rather than hifalutin, impressive-sounding words, '''but''' this does not mean that we should prefer a merely adequate word to a really apt word just because the apt word is a bit more obscure. Choose the familiar word rather than the obscure word, but the precise word rather than the loose word, while avoiding pedantry.


=== Link relevantly ===
=== Link relevantly ===

Revision as of 10:46, 20 January 2009

This is a policy summary. The complete document is here.

Template:TOC-right Citizendium aims to build a body of articles that cover, at a general level, every aspect of their topics. Their purpose is to introduce the topic in an accessible way that is at the same time authoritative. An article is not a mere summary or list of information, but a connected piece of prose, meant to be read all the way through. Articles must be selective in the information they present, but need not be brief; they should say what they need to as clearly as possible, in a concise and interesting way.

Opening section

The opening section should always be introductory, and needs no heading; so the heading "Introduction" is redundant and unnecessary. The first paragraph usually begins with a definition or a description of the topic, and we bold the title of the article in the first sentence. (e.g., Philosophy, both the field and the concept, is notoriously hard to define.). The first paragraph should contain a concise and neutral answer to "Why is this topic important (or interesting)?" If the topic is a person, say what the person is best known for; if an event, summarize its impact; if a place, describe things that make it notable. The rest of the opening section should give the background needed for understanding the rest of the article. The opening section can be a ‘’summary’’ of the information in the article, but this may not be the best use of the space. A brief outline of the article structure is preferable to a summary when the article is very long.

The article body

Generally, articles need a plan which lends coherence and flow and invites readers to keep reading. A task of editors is to help plan articles, and, for complex articles, the plan should be discussed on the Talk page. Major achievements of individuals should be presented before minor ones; the basic tenets of a theory before derivative ones; earlier events before later ones.

Section titles

Section headings help both readers and authors, but too many can be ugly and distracting. An example of a well-organized narrative is this "Biology" article.

Standardized information

If there is to be an article about every species of snake, it is convenient to have a standard order in which facts are presented. When beginning an article, authors should check articles on closely related themes to see if a standard structure has been established. Citizendium workgroups will ultimately settle on any such standard practices.

Citations

See Help:Citation style for details.

We expect citations in about the same quantity as in academic encyclopedias. Citations are not usually needed for information that is common knowledge among experts. But the following categories of claims generally do need citation:

  • direct quotations
  • claims with unique sources (such as survey results, or the finding of a particular paper)
  • implausible-sounding but well-established claims
  • claims central to the article

Always give an online link for any reference, at least to the abstract (via, for example, a PubMed reference.)

Rather than use several references in a single sentence it is better to include several sources in one citation.

Subpages

Factual material, where there is no real narrative flow, may be best presented in subpages. The standard Citizendium page format is for each main article to be accompanied by a set of three standard and numerous optional subpages. See CZ:Subpages for details. The standard subpages will always include:

Related Articles subpage

This page allows connecting each article with other related articles and offers greater insight into the underlying conceptual structure of the encyclopedia. Related Articles subpages generally are organized into a few Parent Topics, which are more general topics within which the current article is located; Subtopics, which are aspects of the main topic worth separate discussion; and Related Topics are "close tangents" which take the discussion off in new but related directions. Thus, for example, the article on World War I includes Parent Topics on War and Nationalism, Subtopics including famous battles such as Galipoli, Verdun and the Somme, and Related Articles on Trench warfare, Mustard gas, and others.

Bibliography subpage

See CZ:Bibliography for more detailed coverage.

This is an annotated bibliography: books, articles, editions and other material that, in the opinion of Citizendium authors represent important and useful texts, clarifying why an item is listed ("one of the most commonly used texts in this field"; "the paper which originally defined the concept"). For example, historical topics should list and annotate the leading sources for information on a topic, and articles about authors should have a list of major works. If an item is available online, the annotation should indicate where and provide the link. (Here are the citation templates.)

Long complicated articles can have a long bibliography page. They may also have a "Suggested reading" section at the end of the main article that presents 5-10 publications suitable for beginners, especially if they are on the web.

How to write annotations is discussed by the Library of Congress publication Creating an Annotation.

External Links subpage

See CZ:External Links for more detailed coverage.

External links should be neutrally annotated. Links to external websites should not be placed within articles but in footnotes. Always link words and phrases to Citizendium articles rather than external sources of information about the word or phrase--even if we still lack an article on the subject. We have rules against self-promotion (policy on topic informants), and contributors should not link to websites that they manage, unless it is evident from a Google search (or other adequate proof) that the website is a leading and reliable source of information.

Optional subpages

A large number of additional subpages may be included with an article. The full current list of subpages includes Works, Discography, Filmography, Catalogs, Timelines, Gallery (Images), Audio and Video pages, Computer Code, Tutorials, Student-level discussions, Signed Article, Function, Addendum, Debate Guide, Advanced and Recipes.

Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and usage

Strunk and White's Elements of Style is very useful; the first edition is available here.

For American English, please consult The Chicago Manual of Style for matters of formatting, punctuation, etc. and Garner's Dictionary of American English Usage for issues of usage.

For British English, consult Fowler's Modern English Usage.

Miscellaneous style guidelines

Craft articles for maximum readability. Many topics may be impossible for a non-specialist fully to understand; our task is to write at the university level, but if a difficult or advanced piece of text can be written to make it more accessible to nonspecialists, then it should be. Professionals are often accused of writing jargon that is decipherable only by people in their fields; our task is to "translate" the jargon into elegant prose.

Write lively prose, not "encyclopedese"

Writing an encyclopedia brings out a tendency in some writers to make prose dull--perhaps the influence of boring encyclopedia articles we read as children. But we can, and should, give our prose personality.

Many writers today have taken William Strunk's pithy injunction, "Omit needless words," to heart. Tightening up flabby verbiage is one of the most needful improvements we can make, but we must not denature our prose entirely: we want our writing to be readable, not encyclopedese.

Another common stylistic rule would have us use simple Anglo-Saxon words rather than hifalutin, impressive-sounding words, but this does not mean that we should prefer a merely adequate word to a really apt word just because the apt word is a bit more obscure. Choose the familiar word rather than the obscure word, but the precise word rather than the loose word, while avoiding pedantry.

Link relevantly

One strength of a wiki-based encyclopedia is the ease with which articles can link to other articles, enabling knowledge-seekers to follow their interests. We encourage interlinking, but it is possible to take this advice to an absurd extreme--linking so many words that many inappropriate links are created, links that distract rather than help.

So a general rule is:

If our target audience would find that the article linked-to illuminates the present article, then we should link to it.

It is important to add links to articles that do not yet exist. Links that lead nowhere help us to gauge what articles are most needed: see Wanted Pages (linked on the left under toolbox > Special pages). But be very selective here.

Link only the first use of a word or phrase, not every use--unless the word is particularly relevant to the point. Thus, the article about Abraham Lincoln might mention (and link to) the Emancipation Proclamation in its opening section, and also in the section about the Proclamation itself.

Quotations

In general, avoid quotations longer than one sentence, and do not use many quotations in any one article. Quotations should not be used to “make an argument”; an argument is made by logic and reason, not by authority, and if a quote is used to support an argument by showing that important people agree with the point, then this is a misuse. However if notable people are identified with a particular argument, then it would be reasonable to quote them directly. For example, Richard Dawkins is a vocal proponent of Darwinism—it should not be presented as an argument for Darwinism that its proponents include Richard Dawkins, but as he has contributed extensively to the debate, and writes in a pithy and accessible way, to quote him would be a reasonable way of illustrating a section that describes his arguments.

Valid uses of quotes include (in biographical sections) to illustrate a person’s views; (in literature articles) to exemplify an author’s style; and (in many articles) to add colour and interest to an article. Be aware that, in some articles, using quotes can introduce a bias. Choose them with care, and consider redressing any bias by annotations, or by balancing quotes from other viewpoints.

For further reading

Sage advice on writing CZ articles.

This is a policy summary. The complete document is here.


Citizendium Content Policy
Approval Standards | Article Mechanics | Subpages | Importing material from other sources | Citable articles
How to Edit
Getting Started Organization Technical Help
Policies Content Policy
Welcome Page