Bone densitometry: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{TOC|right}}
{{TOC|right}}
'''Bone densitometry''' encompasses a range of medical imaging methods used to detect weakening of bone, to detect incipient or actual [[osteoporosis]], and to predict the  risk of fractures. Many of the methods in use are approximations that do not correct for bone thickness, so essentially give an "area" or two-dimensional measurement, which can be inaccurate in children or people of short stature. <ref name=Wash-BMAD>{{citation
'''Bone densitometry''' encompasses a range of medical imaging methods used to detect weakening of bone, to detect incipient or actual [[osteoporosis]], and to predict the  risk of fractures. Major clinical uses include assessing the risk of osteoporosis and the need for preventive therapy in postmenopausal women, and in bone growth disorders in children.
 
Many of the methods in use are approximations that do not correct for bone thickness, so essentially give an "area" or two-dimensional measurement, which can be inaccurate in children or people of short stature. <ref name=Wash-BMAD>{{citation
  | url = http://courses.washington.edu/bonephys/opBMAD.html
  | url = http://courses.washington.edu/bonephys/opBMAD.html
  | title = Bone Mineral Apparent Density
  | title = Bone Mineral Apparent Density

Revision as of 18:11, 25 May 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Bone densitometry encompasses a range of medical imaging methods used to detect weakening of bone, to detect incipient or actual osteoporosis, and to predict the risk of fractures. Major clinical uses include assessing the risk of osteoporosis and the need for preventive therapy in postmenopausal women, and in bone growth disorders in children.

Many of the methods in use are approximations that do not correct for bone thickness, so essentially give an "area" or two-dimensional measurement, which can be inaccurate in children or people of short stature. [1]

Methods of measurement

Ionizing radiation

Traditional X-ray is not useful for screening, because bone density loss is only visible at a severe 40% loss level. There are, however, ways to use X-ray measurement if the preferred methods are not available:[2]

  • "The Singh index describes the trabecular patterns in the bone at the top of the thighbone (femur). X-rays are graded 1 through 6 according to the disappearance of the normal trabecular pattern. Studies have shown a link between a Singh index of less than 3 and fractures of the hip, wrist, and spine.
  • Radiographic absorptiometry was developed during the late 1980s as an easy way to determine BMD with plain X-ray. An X-ray of the hand is taken, incorporating an aluminum reference wedge. The X-ray is then analyzed, and the density of the bone is compared to the density of the reference wedge.

After X-ray, the next techniques developed used an external radioisotope source. While single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) and dual-photon absorptiometry are accurate with a fresh isotope, the methods were logistically problematic because the isotope was short-lived and the source would become less reliable over time.

In SPA, a single-energy photon beam is passed through bone and soft tissue, usually at the distal radius of the wrist, and the amount of radiation-absorbing material is calculated. The wrist is used because there is relatively little soft tissue in the area, which confuses the measurement. DPA uses two photon energy levels, one more absorbed by bone and the other more by soft tissue, which allows correction for soft tissue in the beam.

By returning to an X-ray source, Dual Energy Xray Absorptiometry (DEXA) did away with the isotope decay problem, and is the current "gold standard". [3]

Computed X-ray tomography

The advantage of this method is that it provides true three-dimensional imaging, and allows close examination of a clinically interesting area. It is more expensive than DXAD, gives the patient a much larger radiation dose, and must be performed with extreme care and standardization to be reproducible.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound is cheaper than radiation based methods. Measurements are usually performed at the calcaneous, and it is not feasible to measure at likely fracture sites such as spine or hip.

Magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging is a new method for bone densitometry, and experience is being gained.

Clinical interpretation

References

  1. Bone Mineral Apparent Density, University of Washington
  2. Osteoporosis Tests, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons
  3. Bone Density, University of Washington