Berkeley Software Distribution licenses: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Eric M Gearhart (Added Categories. Licenses are a Legal thing, so Law Workgroup? Correct?) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove any categories (details)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
The BSD family of licenses are considered "Permissive licenses," meaning users are granted complete control over software that is derived from the original BSD Licensed software. | The BSD family of licenses are considered "Permissive licenses," meaning users are granted complete control over software that is derived from the original BSD Licensed software. | ||
| Line 4: | Line 6: | ||
This license model differs fundamentally from other [[open source]] licenses such as the [[GNU General Public License]], which requires derivative software to have its [[source code]] freely available upon request, and derivative works placed under the same license. | This license model differs fundamentally from other [[open source]] licenses such as the [[GNU General Public License]], which requires derivative software to have its [[source code]] freely available upon request, and derivative works placed under the same license. | ||
Latest revision as of 06:39, 25 September 2007
The BSD family of licenses are considered "Permissive licenses," meaning users are granted complete control over software that is derived from the original BSD Licensed software.
In this way BSD licenses are considered very close to simply placing software in the Public domain.
This license model differs fundamentally from other open source licenses such as the GNU General Public License, which requires derivative software to have its source code freely available upon request, and derivative works placed under the same license.