Archive:Should authors share copyright with the Citizendium Foundation?: Revision history

31 August 2020

• curprev 07:4807:48, 31 August 2020‎ imported>John Stephenson‎ 16,431 bytes +16,431‎ Category:Archived Pages
• curprev 07:4507:45, 31 August 2020‎ imported>John Stephenson‎ m 16,421 bytes 0‎ John Stephenson moved page CZ:Should authors share copyright with the Citizendium Foundation? to Archive:Should authors share copyright with the Citizendium Foundation?: archiving old discussion

24 January 2008

• curprev 14:5914:59, 24 January 2008‎ imported>Yuval Langer‎ m 16,421 bytes 0‎ Moving Template:communication to the bottom of the page

10 September 2007

• curprev 10:1410:14, 10 September 2007‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 16,421 bytes +16,421‎ No edit summary

30 March 2007

• curprev 17:5617:56, 30 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ m 16,402 bytes +44‎ →‎Reply: this is not a copyright transfer
• curprev 17:4917:49, 30 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 16,358 bytes +8,881‎ →‎Argument: copyright remaining with individual contributors protects the community: Rewrite of the FSF/Citizendium comparison

29 March 2007

• curprev 01:2701:27, 29 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ m 15,380 bytes +2‎ Spacing out the +ve and -ve sections

28 March 2007

• curprev 19:4819:48, 28 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 15,978 bytes +600‎ →‎Argument: people are wary of giving copyright to others even for money, requesting it will reduce the number of willing contributors: A reply regarding copyright sharing in one's own interest

26 March 2007

• curprev 12:4712:47, 26 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ m 15,378 bytes +1‎ →‎Rebuttal: Citizendium does not have the principles or purpose of the Free Software Foundation
• curprev 12:4512:45, 26 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 15,377 bytes +173‎ →‎Rebuttal: Citizendium does not have the principles or purpose of the Free Software Foundation
• curprev 11:5711:57, 26 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 15,204 bytes +292‎ →‎Reply: within an appropriate framework of guarantees to accompany copyright sharing, the community's rights can be maintained: Rewrite of rebuttal.
• curprev 11:2611:26, 26 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 14,912 bytes +235‎ →‎Argument: people are wary of giving copyright to others even for money, requesting it will reduce the number of willing contributors: A rewrite in accordance with changes elsewhere.
• curprev 11:1311:13, 26 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 14,818 bytes +124‎ Moved around a few things to clarify the argument.
• curprev 10:4710:47, 26 March 2007‎ imported>Anthony DiPierro‎ 14,694 bytes +17‎ →‎Rebuttal: Citizendium editorial policies might limit the "service provider" argument anyway
• curprev 10:4710:47, 26 March 2007‎ imported>Anthony DiPierro‎ 14,677 bytes +227‎ →‎Affirmative: require copyright sharing
• curprev 10:4410:44, 26 March 2007‎ imported>Anthony DiPierro‎ 14,450 bytes +6,973‎ →‎Argument: copyright remaining with individual contributors protects the community
• curprev 10:2210:22, 26 March 2007‎ imported>Anthony DiPierro‎ 13,691 bytes +5,283‎ →‎Argument: copyright sharing makes it easier to defend license violations

25 March 2007

• curprev 06:4806:48, 25 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 13,559 bytes +344‎ →‎Argument: people are wary of giving copyright to others even for money, requesting it will reduce the number of willing contributors: An extra effect beyond copyright fears
• curprev 06:3906:39, 25 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 13,215 bytes +987‎ →‎Reply: we could ask for an appropriate license instead of copyright: A rebuttal.

24 March 2007

• curprev 20:2720:27, 24 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ m 12,228 bytes +51‎ →‎Reply: copyright can be shared in return for certain commitments on the part of the Citizendium Foundation: Reference to FSFE's FLA.
• curprev 20:2620:26, 24 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 12,177 bytes +1,057‎ →‎Argument: contributors should not be expected to share copyright without getting something in return
• curprev 20:0520:05, 24 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 11,120 bytes +1,793‎ →‎Argument: people are wary of giving copyright to others even for money, requesting it will reduce the number of willing contributors
• curprev 19:5819:58, 24 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 10,723 bytes +1,396‎ →‎Argument: copyright remaining with individual contributors protects the community

23 March 2007

• curprev 21:0921:09, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 9,327 bytes +156‎ →‎Argument: copyright remaining with individual contributors protects the community
• curprev 21:0121:01, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 9,171 bytes +645‎ →‎Argument: copyright sharing makes it easier to defend license violations
• curprev 20:4720:47, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 8,526 bytes +118‎ →‎Reply: within an appropriate framework of guarantees to accompany copyright sharing, the community's rights can be maintained: FSF Europe's Fiduciary License Agreement as an example
• curprev 20:4220:42, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ m 8,408 bytes +886‎ update cache
• curprev 20:4020:40, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 8,406 bytes +884‎ More reasons for copyright transfer, notably the argument that copyright sharing makes it easier to defend license violations
• curprev 20:1420:14, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 7,522 bytes +45‎ →‎Reply: The power to relicense can be used against the interests of the contributing community
• curprev 20:0720:07, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 7,477 bytes +7,477‎ →‎Argument: people are wary of giving copyright to others even for money, requesting it will reduce the number of willing contributors
• curprev 20:0420:04, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 7,275 bytes +7,275‎ →‎Reply: The power to relicense can be used against the interests of the contributing community
• curprev 18:3518:35, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 5,365 bytes +3,232‎ →‎Argument: people are wary of giving copyright to others even for money, requesting it will reduce the number of willing contributors
• curprev 18:1818:18, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 4,533 bytes +2,400‎ →‎Reply: The inclusion of material sourced from third parties raises significant practical differences
• curprev 17:5217:52, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 3,374 bytes 0‎ It's a question of requesting, not requesting.
• curprev 17:4317:43, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 3,374 bytes +1,241‎ →‎Argument: copyright sharing makes relicensing of content significantly easier: A pro argument.
• curprev 17:1017:10, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 2,133 bytes +1,308‎ A general outline of issues to be debated
• curprev 16:3016:30, 23 March 2007‎ imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling‎ 825 bytes +825‎ Introduction to the issue, intended to be neutral (others should check:-)