Aortic valve stenosis: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
(Started 'Grading the degree of stenosis')
imported>Robert Badgett
Line 11: Line 11:


===Grading the degree of stenosis===
===Grading the degree of stenosis===
According to joint [[clinical practice guideline]]s by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association:<ref name="pmid16880336">Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B.[http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/114/5/450 ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons].Circulation. 2006 Aug 1;114(5):e84-231. PMID 16880336 (see page 462 for indications for replacement)</ref
According to joint [[clinical practice guideline]]s by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association:<ref name="pmid16880336">Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B.[http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/114/5/450 ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons].Circulation. 2006 Aug 1;114(5):e84-231. PMID 16880336 (see page 462 for indications for replacement)</ref>
* "Mild (area 1.5 cm2, mean gradient less than 25 mm Hg, or jet velocity less than 3.0 m per second)"
* "Mild (area 1.5 cm2, mean gradient less than 25 mm Hg, or jet velocity less than 3.0 m per second)"
* "Moderate (area 1.0 to 1.5 cm2, mean gradient 25–40 mm Hg, or jet velocity 3.0–4.0 m per second)"
* "Moderate (area 1.0 to 1.5 cm2, mean gradient 25–40 mm Hg, or jet velocity 3.0–4.0 m per second)"

Revision as of 09:04, 7 November 2008

In medicine, aortic valve stenosis is an abnormality of the aortic valve in the heart.[1]

Diagnosis

A systematic review by the Rational Clinical Examination addresses diagnosis.[2] Since publication of the systematic review, a clinical prediction rule may help detecting moderate to severe aortic valve stenosis (defined as a valve area of 1.2 cm2or less, or a peak instantaneous gradient of 25 mm Hg or greater):[3]

  • If the heart murmur does not radiate to the right neck, moderate aortic stenosis was very unlikely
  • If the heart murmur has at least three of the following signs, moderate stenosis was likely:
    • slow carotid artery upstroke (other studies suggest more than 200 msec is abnormal[4])
    • reduced carotid artery volume
    • heart murmur loudest at the second right intercostal space
    • reduced intensity of the second heart sound

Grading the degree of stenosis

According to joint clinical practice guidelines by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association:[5]

  • "Mild (area 1.5 cm2, mean gradient less than 25 mm Hg, or jet velocity less than 3.0 m per second)"
  • "Moderate (area 1.0 to 1.5 cm2, mean gradient 25–40 mm Hg, or jet velocity 3.0–4.0 m per second)"
  • "Severe (area less than 1.0 cm2, mean gradient greater than 40 mm Hg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m per second)"

Treatment

Joint clinical practice guidelines by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association address treatment[5]

Surgery

According to the ACC/AHA guidelines:[5] Class I recommendations

  1. "AVR is indicated for symptomatic patients with severe AS."
  2. "AVR is indicated for patients with severe AS* undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)."
  3. "AVR is indicated for patients with severe AS* undergoing surgery on the aorta or other heart valves."
  4. "AVR is recommended for patients with severe AS* and LV systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction less than 0.50). "

Class IIa recommendations

  1. "AVR is reasonable for patients with moderate AS* undergoing CABG or surgery on the aorta or other heart valves."

Class IIb recommendations

  1. "AVR may be considered for asymptomatic patients with severe AS* and abnormal response to exercise (e.g., development of symptoms or asymptomatic hypotension)."
  2. "AVR may be considered for adults with severe asymptomatic AS* if there is a high likelihood of rapid progression (age, calcification, and CAD) or if surgery might be delayed at the time of symptom onset."
  3. "AVR may be considered in patients undergoing CABG who have mild AS* when there is evidence, such as moderate to severe valve calcification, that progression may be rapid."
  4. "AVR may be considered for asymptomatic patients with extremely severe AS (aortic valve area less than 0.6 cm2, mean gradient greater than 60 mm Hg, and jet velocity greater than 5.0 m per second) when the patient’s expected operative mortality is 1.0% or less."

Prognosis

Risks factors have been studied.[6]

References

  1. ↑ Carabello BA. Clinical practice. Aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 28;346(9):677-82. Review. No abstract available. PMID 11870246
  2. ↑ Etchells E, Bell C, Robb K (February 1997). "Does this patient have an abnormal systolic murmur?". JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association 277 (7): 564–71. PMID 9032164. [e] Full text at OVID
  3. ↑ Etchells E, Glenns V, Shadowitz S, Bell C, Siu S (October 1998). "A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis". Journal of general internal medicine : official journal of the Society for Research and Education in Primary Care Internal Medicine 13 (10): 699–704. PMID 9798818. PMC 1500900. [e] PubMed Central
  4. ↑ Flohr KH, Weir EK, Chesler E (May 1981). "Diagnosis of aortic stenosis in older age groups using external carotid pulse recording and phonocardiography". British heart journal 45 (5): 577–82. PMID 7236464. PMC 482567. [e]
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B.ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.Circulation. 2006 Aug 1;114(5):e84-231. PMID 16880336 (see page 462 for indications for replacement)
  6. ↑ Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, Lang I, Christ G, Schemper M, Maurer G, Baumgartner H.Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 31;343(9):611-7. PMID 10965007
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Aortic_valve_stenosis&oldid=551793"