African-American history: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Shapinsky
(New page: What has come to be known as "Black history" (also known as African-American history) developed out of the same forces that shaped the Civil Rights Movement. While African-Americans and t...)
 
imported>Louise Valmoria
m ({{subpages}} adding subpage template only)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
What has come to be known as "Black history" (also known as African-American history) developed out of the same forces that shaped the Civil Rights Movement.  While African-Americans and their African ancestors played a central role in creating and defining the United States, these Americans had few people to tell their stories.  Some noted scholars, such as W.E.B. Dubois, shed light on the African-American experience.  But that experience was often ignored by white historians.  
What has come to be known as "Black history" (also known as African-American history) developed out of the same forces that shaped the Civil Rights Movement.  While African-Americans and their African ancestors played a central role in creating and defining the United States, these Americans had few people to tell their stories.  Some noted scholars, such as W.E.B. Dubois, shed light on the African-American experience.  But that experience was often ignored by white historians.  



Revision as of 22:38, 6 December 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

What has come to be known as "Black history" (also known as African-American history) developed out of the same forces that shaped the Civil Rights Movement. While African-Americans and their African ancestors played a central role in creating and defining the United States, these Americans had few people to tell their stories. Some noted scholars, such as W.E.B. Dubois, shed light on the African-American experience. But that experience was often ignored by white historians.

By the end of the 19th Century, African-Americans were commonly depicted in derogatory ways. The days of slavery were portrayed as a time when black people were happy and content. And many historians came to view the aftermath of the Civil War as a tragic time when blacks and carpet-baggers ran wild. In this history, it was the Klu Klux Klan (KKK) that came to save the day.

This portrayal of African-Americans was popularized by filmmaker D.W. Griffith in the Birth of a Nation. The 1915 film glorified the KKK. But it was a view that dominated film and literature into the 1930s when Gone with the Wind offered a romantic story of the Old South full of blacks who appeared content to play inferior roles.

Black history attempted to reverse centuries of ignorance. While black historians were not alone in advocating a new examination of slavery and racism in the United States, the study of African-American history has often been a political and scholarly struggle to change assumptions.

One of the foremost assumptions was that slaves were passive and did not rebel. For decades, historians sought to find explanations for this alleged reality. Eventually, a series of historians transformed the image of African-Americans, revealing a much richer and complex experience. Historians, such as Leon Littwack, showed how former slaves fought to keep their families together and struggled against tremendous odds to define themselves as free people. Others wrote of rebellions small and large.

In the Twenty-First Century, black history is regarded as mainstream and is celebrated every February in the United States during "Black History Month."