Stem cell
The term stem cell is generally used to describe cells that are totipotent, pluripotent, or multipotent.[1]
Totipotent cells have the capacity to differentiate to all cell types, including somatic cells, germ cells, and certain cells that exist outside the embryo and are important to fetal development that are termed extraembryonic cells. Pluripotent cells may differentiate to cells of most types, and multipotent cells are capable only of differentiating to certain types within a group of cells that perform similar functions. The term stem cell is also used in reference to any adult cells that are capable of assisting in the restoration of adult tissue via self-renewal.[1]
The use of the pluripotent and/or self-renewing qualities of stem cells is believed to have therapeutic benefits for the regeneration of tissue in humans. Such tissue renewal may be accomplished via the use of adult stem cells, or embryonic stem cells, which may be derived from a human embryo in the blastocyst stage. The use of embryonic stem cells has been a source of considerable controversy due to its sacrifice of human embryos in the blastocyst stage, which some people view as the destruction of human life.
Use of embryonic stem cells
Human embryos fertilized in the ordinary manner and harvested in the blastocyst stage have been used as an extensive source of stem cells for research purposes, and have been shown to possess therapeutic value in laboratory animals. In a study characteristic of this line of research, human embryonic stem cells were injected into mice whose spinal cords had been wounded:
Nine days after spinal cord injury, mice received four injections bilaterally 0.75mm from midline at both the anterior aspect of T10 and the posterior aspect of T8. Each site received 250 nl of cells or vehicle.[2]
After sixteen weeks, the injured mice who received human stem cell injections experienced a significant improvement in the motor functions that had been impaired by their injuries. Furthermore, the use of diphtheria toxin -- which is far more toxic to human cells than mouse cells -- to destroy the human neurons in the mice reversed the observed improvements in motor function. This result suggests that the observed increase in motor function was indeed produced by neurons derived from the human embryonic stem cells. Cross-species transplantation was possible without the rejection of the human embryonic stem cells by the mice's immune systems because the mice were genetically modified to suppress certain immune responses that would have interfered with transplantation.
Properly controlled, adequately sized studies have yet to demonstrate that human embryonic stem cells have medical value in humans.[3]
The most infamous study of embryonic stem cells asserted that cloned human embryos had been created via somatic cell nuclear transfer, and stem cells had been generated from these embryos.[4] The authors claimed that these stem cells were genetically indistinguishable from the donors from whom the somatic cells were taken, and were pluripotent: the stem cells allegedly
express hESC pluripotency markers... DNA fingerprinting with human short tandem-repeat probes... shows with high certainty that every NT-hESC line derived here originated from the respective patient donor and that these lines were not the result of enucleation failures and subsequent parthenogenetic activation.[5]
Ironically, the authors of this study deride "cruel hoaxes... regarding human... cloning"[6], a reference the claim of Clonaid that it had produced five cloned human infants.[7] This study was retracted when it was discovered that the authors had falsified their data.[8]
Researchers have recently described new lines of stem cells derived from amniotic fluid[9]. Such cells provide a potential alternative to embryonic stem cells.
Ethical considerations regarding embryonic stem cells
Ethical objections to the use of human embryonic stem cells revolve around the destruction of human embryos in the blastocyst stage to obtain the stem cells. Those who oppose this practice often argue that human life begins from the moment of conception, and that, therefore, destruction of a blastocyst stage embryo is morally equivalent to abortion and infanticide. However, supporters of embryonic stem cell research frequently contend that even the comparison to abortion is inappropriate, since while a several month old fetus might have sufficient neurological development to be conscious in some meaningful sense, a human embryo in the blastocyst stage has so little development that one can safely conclude that it cannot exist as a conscious being.
Self renewal and adult stem cells
Adult stem cells hold great promise in mitigating much of the ethical debate over embryonic stem cell use. Adult stem cells are primarily for self renewal and involves the production of a transit amplifying cell via a process known as asymmetric division. The transit amplifying cell divides repeatedly, after which the resulting cells differentiate and "[refresh] tissues and organs with replacement cells."[10] Moreover, self-renewal allows the production of new cells where the division of existing cells incorporated into an organ would be disruptive:
the somatic stem cell play[s] its role when cell division conflict[s] with function (e.g. stem cells suppl[y] neuroblasts when neurons [can] not afford to sacrifice half their synapses for the sake of cell division).[11]
Use of adult stem cells for tissue tegeneration
Early research suggested that adult stem cells may be pluripotent in humans and animals; a study in mice is typical of this line of research.[12] In that study, bone marrow was transplanted "from transgenic mice (8 to 10 weeks of age) that ubiquitously expressed enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP)"[13] and implanted "into lethally irradiated, isogenic adult (8- to 10-week-old) recipients..."[14] The GFP was used to identify neurons in the transplant recipients that were descendants of stem cells in the bone marrow they received. Bone marrow stem cells were found to migrate to the brains of the recipients:
Brains harvested several months after the transplant... and examined by light microscopy revealed the presence of GFP1 cells throughout the CNS, including the olfactory bulb, hippocampus, cortical areas, and cerebellum.[12]
These cells produced proteins normally created by neurons, suggesting that the stem cells had been differentiated to neurons. Furthermore, the GFP labeled cells adopted the electrical properties of neurons:
A major signal transduction pathway present in neurons is also intact in bone marrow-derived cells that express neuron-specific genes in the brain.[15]
Thus, the study clearly demonstrated the in vivo pluripotency of bone marrow derived stem cells in mice.
In humans, the migration of stem cells from a bone marrow transplant to the brain has been observed.[16] The brains of female patients who had received "bone marrow transplants from male donors"[16] and had died from cancer were examined to discover neurons which contained Y chromosomes, which would indicate that they were derived from stem cells in the bone marrow. Y chromosomes were labeled with radioactive isotopes and fluorescent dyes. Many Y chromosomes were found in cells that also contained proteins indicating that they were neurons:
In each of the transplanted patients examined we readily detected Y-positive cells by means of autoradiography. In all patients using conventional fluorescent microscopy we observed double-labeled cells that were positive for both the Y chromosome and one of the neuronal markers as shown in an example in Fig. 1. Most of the cells that were double-labeled with the Y chromosome and the neuronal markers were detected in the hippocampus and the neocortex of patients...[17]
However, a far smaller percentage of bone marrow stem cell derived neurons were observed than in the analogous, previously described study on mice: the human study "found 2-5 Y-positive neurons per 10,000 human neurons vs. 50 per 10,000 rodent neurons."[18], which may indicate that bone marrow derived stem cells had a reduced efficacy in producing neurons in humans, possibly due to a reduced pluripotency.
In November of 2007, two groups of researchers simultaneously reported a method of reprogramming somatic cells (i.e., skin cells) into pluripotent stem cells[19], [20]. The process requires the activity of four different genes and in these pilot experiments the genes are inserted into the skin cells using a retrovirus. This is not ideal as there is the potential for tumor growth in tissues derived using this methodology; new methods are now required to activate these genes without the invasive use of the virus.
Synopsis
The research on adult stem cells suggests that they may have significant medical value since they can migrate to organs other than those from which they were extracted and can differentiate to cells of the appropriate type. Further, the use of adult stem cells holds great promise in mitigating much of the ethical debate over embryonic stem cell use. The therapeutic benefits for adult stem cells, however, are not proven and further study is necessary to demonstrate their safety and efficacy in practice for curing medical problems via tissue regeneration.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Shostak, Stanley: "(Re)defining stem cells", Bioessays 28(3), March 2006: pages 301 - 308
- ↑ Cummings et al: "Human neural stem cells differentiate and promote locomotor recovery in spinal cord-injured mice", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (39), September 27, 2005, pages 14069 - 14074, page 14069
- ↑ National Institutes of Health: "FAQs [Stem Cell Information]", http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/faqs.asp, Healthcare Questions: 2
- ↑ Hwang et al: "Patient-Specific Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from Human SCNT Blastocysts", Science Volume 308, June 17, 2005, pages 1777 - 1783 (RETRACTED)
- ↑ Hwang et al: "Patient-Specific Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from Human SCNT Blastocysts", Science Volume 308, June 17, 2005, pages 1778-1779 (RETRACTED)
- ↑ Hwang et al: "Patient-Specific Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from Human SCNT Blastocysts", Science Volume 308, June 17, 2005, page 1783 (RETRACTED)
- ↑ Schatten et al: "Cloning Claim is Science Fiction, Not Science", Science Volume 299, January 17, 2003, page 344
- ↑ "Editorial Retraction", Science Vol. 311, January 20, 2006, page 335
- ↑ De Coppi et al. 2007. "Isolation of amniotic stem cell lines with potential for therapy." Nature Biotecnology 25: 100-106.
- ↑ Shostak, Stanley: "(Re)defining stem cells", Bioessays 28(3), March 2006: pages 301 - 308, page 305
- ↑ Shostak, Stanley: "(Re)defining stem cells", Bioessays 28(3), March 2006: pages 301 - 308, page 303
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Brazelton et al: "From Marrow to Brain: Expression of Neuronal Phenotypes in Adult Mice", Science Volume 290, December 1, 2000, pages 1775 - 1779
- ↑ Brazelton et al: "From Marrow to Brain: Expression of Neuronal Phenotypes in Adult Mice", Science Volume 290, December 1, 2000, pages 1775-1776
- ↑ Brazelton et al: "From Marrow to Brain: Expression of Neuronal Phenotypes in Adult Mice", Science Volume 290, December 1, 2000, page 1776
- ↑ Brazelton et al: "From Marrow to Brain: Expression of Neuronal Phenotypes in Adult Mice", Science Volume 290, December 1, 2000, page 1778
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Mezey et al.:"Transplanted bone marrow generates new neurons in human brains." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 (3), February 4, 2003, pages 1364 - 1369
- ↑ Mezey et al.:"Transplanted bone marrow generates new neurons in human brains." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 (3), February 4, 2003, page 1365
- ↑ Mezey et al.:"Transplanted bone marrow generates new neurons in human brains." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 (3), February 4, 2003, page 1368
- ↑ Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K and Yamanaka S. (2007) Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors." Cell 131(5):861-72 PMID 18035408
- ↑ Yu, J., Vodyanik, M.A., Smuga-Otto, K., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Frane, J.L., Tian, S., Nie, J., Jonsdottir, G.A., Ruotti, V., Stewart, R., et al. (2007) Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318:1917–1920. PMID 18029452