Grant peer review/Related Articles

Grant peer review: A variant of peer review in which grant proposals are being evaluated; used by research funding agencies to decide how to distribute their funds. ^[e]

This article contains just a definition and optionally other subpages (such as a list of related articles), but no metadata. Create the metadata page if you want to expand this into a full article.

Parent topics

Research peer review [r]: Evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. ^[e]
Research funding [r]: The provision of financial resources for the purpose of studying something by means of the scientific method. ^[e]

Research proposal [r]: A description of planned scientific research that is formally submitted to a research funding agency. ^[e]
Research grant [r]: Add brief definition or description
Journal peer review [r]: The most common variant of manuscript peer review, in which scholarly manuscripts are being evaluated; used by academic publishing agencies to decide about formal publication in academic journals. ^[e]
Single-blind peer review [r]: The currently most common variant of peer review, in which the reviewers of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about the identity of the authors, but not vice versa. ^[e]
Double-blind peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which neither the authors nor the reviewers of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about each other's identity. ^[e]
Open peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which the authors of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about the identity of the reviewers. ^[e]
Public peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which the evaluation of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal takes place in public before formal publication. ^[e]
Post-publication peer review [r]: Add brief definition or description