CZ:Charter drafting committee
A community-elected delegation of citizens will be tasked with drafting the initial draft of the Citizendium charter. Following the release of the initial draft, the committee's work will be done and all other citizens will be encouraged to propose modifications, additions, deletions. This will allow for a more expeditious drafting process and still allow input from all Citizendium members.
Delegates
Delegates will be chosen by popular election. Throughout, the process will be highly publicized so as to involve as many members as possible.
Nomination
Candidates will be nominated by the community. Any member of Citizendium may nominate up to 5 other citizens to be candidates for election to the committee by adding a new row to the table below (Instructions are given in the source text, click here to make a nomination). No member may nominate himself/herself. The nomination will not be signed, but, of course, the history can be checked. Members who have been nominated may accept or decline by signing in the appropriate column with four tildes (~~~~) and deleting the text in the other box. The nomination period will open September 6, 2009 and will close 2 weeks later at midnight on September 19, 2009 or when a minimum of 20 nominations have been submitted and accepted, whichever comes last.
| Nominee | Accept | Decline
|
|---|---|---|
| Howard C. Berkowitz | Howard C. Berkowitz 17:36, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | |
| Milton Beychok | Milton Beychok 02:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | |
| Chris Day | (accept) | (decline) |
| Shamira Gelbman | (accept) | (decline) |
| Meg Ireland | (accept) | (decline) |
| Russell D. Jones | (accept) | (decline) |
| Roger Lohmann | (accept) | (decline) |
| D. Matt Innis | (accept) | (decline) |
| Daniel Mietchen | (accept) | (decline) |
| Hayford Peirce | (Hayford Peirce 00:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)) | |
| Joe Quick | (accept) | (decline) |
| Supten Sarbadhikari | (accept) | (decline) |
| Drew R. Smith | (accept) | (decline) |
| Ro Thorpe | Ro Thorpe 22:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | |
| Paul Wormer | (accept) | (decline) |
Election
Elections will follow the period allowed for nominations. This period will also last 2 weeks from the official start date.
While the process should remain highly publicized, campaigning itself must be rather limited. While candidates will be allowed to post a 500-word statement of purpose in a dedicated section of the Citizendium forums to outline their beliefs, political competition is not meant to be the focus of the selection process. Rather, a spirit of cooperation should prevail. Under no circumstances should candidates directly seek the votes of other contributors.
Each citizen will be allowed to cast five votes but may not cast more than one for a single candidate and is not required to use all five possible votes. At the end of the voting period, the 8 candidates who receive the most votes will be officially installed on the drafting committee. In the case of a tie, up to ten delegates will be admitted to the committee. If a tie would result in more than ten delegates, a runoff election will be held for all nominees who received enough votes to be seated as delegates.
Drafting period
The drafting committee will be allowed 4 weeks to complete an initial draft before it is opened up for public proposals. Committee members will be given broad latitude to define which specific issues the draft engages and how it does so but they are expected to create a document that develops the ideas encoded in the current statement of fundamental policies and those that are implicit in the day-to-day operation of the wiki. The committee will also be allowed to determine the way it divides its work among its members and other logistical matters.
Drafting will take place on the wiki but only delegates to the drafting committee will be allowed to make edits. The talk page will be reserved for delegates while other discussion should be directed to a special section of the forums dedicated to the charter. During the 4-week drafting period, committee members will be allowed to consult other members or even non-citizens. Other citizens may also make suggestions and engage in discussion in the forums or contact members of the committee directly to voice their concerns. Delegates may choose whether they engage that discussion directly and will not be required to address every comment individually but they are expected to make every effort to consider all perspectives and write a balanced document that addresses the needs of all Citizendium members. A spirit of compromise must be embraced if a thorough and balanced draft is to be produced in 4 weeks; thoughtfulness and open-mindedness are much desired virtues in committee members.
The role of the Editor-in-Chief
The Editor-in-Chief will occupy a unique position in the drafting of the Charter. He will not be a member of the drafting committee per se but will be directly engaged in the process. He will be the only person not on the drafting committee allowed to write on the discussion page of the drafting committee. Because the Charter is the expression of the ideals and goals of our community, the Editor-in-Chief will not be allowed to directly edit the text of the Charter while it is being drafted. (This gesture should by no means suggest that the Editor-in-Chief is not allowed or welcome to propose language for the Charter on the discussion page.)
Next step
After the initial draft has been completed, the drafting committee's job will be done and members of the drafting committee will not be afforded any privileges above those of other members. Changes will be allowed in the text of the draft but only following broad agreement among the majority of discussants in the forums. Following 4 weeks of open discussion, if all major points of discussion have been addressed, the text of the draft will be locked and the draft will be put to a popular vote for confirmation.