Talk:Hamdi v. Rumsfeld

From Citizendium
Revision as of 22:16, 3 March 2009 by imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{subpages}})
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A 2004 opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that a U.S. citizen, captured in a combat zone and alleged to be bearing arms against the United States, still was entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if he was an enemy combatant subject to military, rather than civilian, law [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Law and Military [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English