< Perfect numberRevision as of 11:18, 14 May 2008 by imported>Barry R. Smith
Definition in terms of the sum-of-divisors function
Perfect numbers can be succinctly defined using the sum-of-divisors function
. If
is a counting number, then
is the sum of the divisors of
. A number
is perfect precisely when
.
Proof of the classification of even perfect numbers
Euclid showed that every number of the form
![{\displaystyle 2^{n-1}(2^{n}-1)}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/cd65f770559bac921e8eed985ce1e8e2a2afe5b1)
where
is a Mersenne prime number is perfect. A short proof that every even perfect number must have this form can be given using elementary number theory.
The main prerequisite results from elementary number theory, besides a general familiarity with divisibility, are the following:
is a multiplicative function. In other words, if
and
are relatively prime positive integers, then
.
- If
is a power of a prime number, then
![{\displaystyle \sigma (p^{n})={\frac {p^{n+1}-1}{p-1}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/e59f2b503e5c6304a5473f33b817729365c4dd0e)
The proof[1]
Let
be an even perfect number, and write
where
and
is odd. As
is multiplicative,
.
Since
is perfect,
,
and so
.
The fraction on the right side is in lowest terms, and therefore there is an integer
so that
.
If
, then
has at least the divisors
,
, and 1, so that
,
a contradiction. Hence,
,
, and
![{\displaystyle \sigma \left(2^{r+1}-1\right)=2^{r+1}.}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/ebba1f1fcc56224f371718319d0226920216a343)
If
is not prime, then it has divisors other than itself and 1, and
.
Hence,
is prime, and the theorem is proved.
- ↑ From Hardy and Wright, Introduction to the Theory of Numbers