Evolution of hominin intelligence

From Citizendium
Revision as of 16:26, 27 April 2008 by imported>Diana Phung (→‎Development of the brain)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Attention niels epting.png
Attention niels epting.png
This article is currently being developed as part of an Eduzendium student project. If you are not involved with this project, please refrain from collaboratively developing it until this notice is removed.
Articles that lack this notice, including many Eduzendium ones, welcome your collaboration!


This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The evolution of hominin intelligence can be viewed as a result of an environmental challenge throughout time and can be traced over the past 10 million years. There are several ways to define intelligence besides the more common measure of "understanding". Intelligence includes a combination of traits such as reasoning, planning, the comprehension of ideas, language, learning and problem solving. More sophisticated qualities that are very difficult to quantify include creativity or personality traits.

Development of the brain

Up until approximately 5 million years ago and the beginning of the Pliocene era where we begin to notice the development of the hominin brain(2)before this time period, the hominin brain was no larger then the brain of other mammals of similar size. It is believed that the size of the brain determines the intelligence of the individual(2), early hominin had an excellent understanding of the mechanical properties and increase in cognitive adaptability. Compared to chimpanzees and gorillas, the development of the hominin brain is three times larger. Current research on the HAR1(Human Accelerated Region 1) has quickly evolved in the modern hominins compared to their ancestors(8). HAR1 is an RNA gene that is expressed in the early neural embryo genesis. Through re-sequencing studies, David Hausler et.al indicated that the changes in the human lineage to be approximately more then 1million years old3. HAR1 encodes for two oppositely transcribe RNA’s; 1) HAR1F and 2) HAR1R. David Hausler observed that the double-stranded helix of the HAR1F is longer in modern human compared to chimpanzee. This suggests that RNA on the brain is different in hominin compared to chimpanzee and gorillas, however, many studies still need to be conducted. Stern and Woods state that both genes Microcephalin (MCPH1) and ASPM (MCH 5) control human brain size.

However, a larger skull created a problem for the female hominins because it required the female to have a larger birth canal. A larger and wider pelvis would lose her ability to use the other motor skills(Citation Needed) that was used for survival. The mother had to give birth at an early stage otherwise the infant skull grew too large for the birth canal. This suggests the dependency that the hominin infants have to their mothers compared to other mammal and primate infants. With the need to care for infants, hominin groups were force to stay in one location for long periods of time. This suggests the increase of dependency on tool-making because the male hominins would hunt and defend his area, while the female hominins would care for the infant and group.

Pleistocene (1.8 million years ago)

Pleistocene has been dated to be 1.8million years to 10,000years was the beginning of the evolution of modern humans, Stone-age culture and technical complexity. Australopithecus are related to hominins but during this time period, hominins brain size increased, which suggest the increase of intelligence. Approximately 2million years ago, Homo habilis showed characteristic of modern hominid. Evidence of Stone tool, such as stone and teeth and claws from other animals was used which gave evidence that hominin diet increased from herbivore to carnivore. Understanding to use of stone tool allowed early hominin such as Homo habilis to cut hid and cut meat, thus increases their understanding to adapt to their environment. However, more research is still needed to understand the hominin diet.

Stone tool

Diversity of tool-making and tool-using behavior is observed in chimpanzee but the intelligence of advance stone tool is observed from early hominid. The use of stone tools required larger brain mass to complete such skill to survive. With the understanding of tools and the ability to control fire, this gave early hominin to modern man the ability to defend themselves against predators and longer hours to gather and hunt for food. The earliest evidence of hominid technology is found in Ethiopian Rift Valley and the Olduvai Gorge, dated 2.5 Ma. Known as the Oldowan Industrial Complex, Australopithecus Africanus and Homo habilis are considered to be the first tool maker, were highly skilled in stone flaking (cite 1). Unlike, chimpanzee’s that have a narrow fingertip, Modern Man has short straight fingers and long thumb that increases the stability of gripping tools. Homo habilis is considered to be the first tool maker. Around 1.5 mya, large cutting tool, approximately 10 to 17 cm long was invented by Homo erectus, thus developing the Acheulean industrial complex. Large cutting tools suggests that these tools were multipurpose tools, such as butchery, woodworking, etc. (Cite 1)

Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Homo sapiens and Neanderthal Man

Homo habilis

Australopithecus evolved bipedal; however, hominids developed a variety of things that Modern Man uses today, such as culture, art, religion, language and tools. The first species to appear in the genus Homos is Homo habilis, which evolved around 2 million years ago. The skull is thinner and more rounded, which suggest intelligence and lager brain mass. Even though their cranial capacity (600 to 800 cc) and body size was about half of Modern Man, their hand and feet are similar in size to that of Modern Man. Less prominent jaw and artifacts that were found with the fossil suggest that they utilized and advanced stone flakes for stone tools (Insert Citation). It is observed that H. Habilis did not use tool for defense or hunting but it was used for cleaving meat off and for scavenging.

Homo erectus

Homo erectus was more diverse and developed better tools and weapon. Highly sexual dimorphic, their brain size is approximately 950cc, while their height was 5’10” (males). Believed to be the first human species of hunter-gatherer society, their cranial capacity suggests more sophisticated tool technology (Insert Citation). It is also believed that Homo erectus is the first to be able to hunt in a large scale tame fire, to live in small society, and care for others.

Homo sapiens

Neanderthal man

Also known as Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, Neanderthal is believed to have coexisted with modern humans after Homo sapiens migrated to Europe. (Cite 6) Similar height to modern man, Neanderthal Man had a short robust bodies, larger brain capacity, large nose. The height of the male is approximately 5’5” and the female was 5’0”. It is suggested that their stone tools were used of the Mousterian class, where their hammer were used from material such as bones, antler and wood, rather then a stone hammer. Also, evidence of stone-flakes, hand axes, and spears were used and evidence of wood.

Classification

Reference

Ambrose SH (2001) “Paleolithic Technology and Human Evolution.” Science Volume 291, pages 1748-1753

Flinn MV, Geary DC, Ward CV (2005) “Ecological dominance, social competition, and coalitionary arms races: Why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence.” Evolution and Human Behavior Volume 26, pages 10-46

Goymer P, (2006) “ RNA on the brain makes us different” Nature Volume 7, page 680

Klein RG (2003) “Paleoanthropology: Whither the Neanderthals?” Science 299 Page 1525-1527

Mcilroy, Anne (2006) Neanderthal may have lived longer then thought. Globe and mail. Retreived on 2008-03-24

Pollard KS et. al “An RNA gene expressed during cortical development evolved rapidly in humans” Nature Volume 441, pages 167-172

Rosenberg KR, Trevathan W. (1996) "Bipedalism and human birth: the obstetrical dilemma revisited" Evolution Anthropology Volume4, page 161-168

Stern R, Woods CG (2006) “Is brain evolution still continuing un modern human” European Journal of Human Genetics Volume 14, pages 799-800