Talk:Georges Cuvier

From Citizendium
Revision as of 07:40, 22 February 2009 by imported>Brian P. Long (→‎Claim in Intro: new section)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (1769 - 1832) vertebrate paleontologist and comparative anatomist who established the extinction of past lifeforms as an accepted scientific fact. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Anthropology, Archaeology and Eduzendium [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Eduzendium project

I am working on this page for a project for my class. Constructive criticism is welcome. ...said Reagan Fair (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2008 (Please sign your talk page posts by simply adding four tildes, ~~~~.)

Looks like this person dropped the class? J. Noel Chiappa 20:22, 4 May 2008 (CDT)

Since I know of a Citizen who wants to work on this topic, I've deleted the page. (It was blank.) --Larry Sanger 20:42, 27 July 2008 (CDT)

Claim in Intro

What gives Cuvier pride of place as "the founder ... of the comparative method of organismal biology, and functional anatomy, the essence of which is that the knowledge of structure acquires meaning only when the purpose is known" ? As opposed to Aristotle as a comparative biologist on the one hand, and on the other, a number of earlier biologists and doctors (Galen, e.g.) who were preoccupied with function as well as structure?

I'm not presuming to change the article or anything; it's more that I am curious about the implicit distinctions being made here... Thanks, Brian P. Long 13:40, 22 February 2009 (UTC)