Talk:Color

Article Checklist for "Color"

Workgroup category or categories	Biology Workgroup, Physics Workgroup, Visual Arts Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status	Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article?	No
Basic cleanup done?	No
Checklist last edited by	Russell Potter 08:32, 13 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.

---

Work in progress.--Robert W King 08:28, 13 June 2007 (CDT)

Categories

Not sure where this should go -- will this be an entry on color as part of the visible spectrum of light, on the biology of color reception by the human eye or brain, or color in the arts? Russell Potter 08:33, 13 June 2007 (CDT)

I think all three! I plan to discuss pigments, how it's produced in various materials, use; but also elaborate more on the scientific process behind it. There's lots of work to do.--Robert W King 08:32, 13 June 2007 (CDT)

The funny thing is, I was just about to add biology, but someone beat me to it. Greg Woodhouse 14:56, 13 July 2007 (CDT)

Reference links

• http://www.multimediaarts.com/watercolors/colrhist.htm
• http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/gen01/gen01703.htm

This segment:

"The wavelngth of monochromotic light (or of an individual photon) falls into a continuous range of about 400 to 750 nanometers. We split this range up into seven colors because they correspond well to the way we see light."

I agree it's an integral part of the article but where it currently stands is a little out of place; it does not "flow". Perhaps it should go into the introductory paragraph?--Robert W King 11:52, 15 July 2007 (CDT)

I added it where I did because I wanted to clarify the statement that light is divided up into seven colors. it probably should be moved up, but then the section on the spectrum (which is misnamed) also needs to be rewritten a bit. At any rate, I was trying to be as nonintrusive as possible. Greg Woodhouse 12:21, 15 July 2007 (CDT)

I'm not implying you're intruding ;). I welcome any and all feedback; I just wanted to know where you thought it should go and what needs editing for readership context.--Robert W King 12:31, 15 July 2007 (CDT)