Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- This is not rocket science. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:51, 6 February 2007 (CST)68 KB (11,344 words) - 10:47, 7 March 2024
- ...ook up Aleta's challenge that something wasn't rocket science, and wrote [[rocket science]].124 KB (20,311 words) - 07:38, 31 May 2024
- ...t scientists did not say the communications engineers could not understand rocket science. Instead, we looked for ways to establish ways to communicate. We communica151 KB (24,906 words) - 14:05, 5 June 2024
- ...ing else I can't understand. What can I say? My problem is that it isn't [[rocket science]]?140 KB (22,222 words) - 17:34, 10 February 2024
- ...credit form can simple elect NOT to have their names appear. This is not rocket science, folks.127 KB (21,362 words) - 03:01, 8 March 2024
- ...eliminary planning. While it started out as a joke, I did get a start on [[rocket science]]; I'm stuck because I don't know how to format some of the equations. [[Br170 KB (27,552 words) - 17:02, 22 March 2024
- ...coherent set of principles. While somewhat tongue-in-cheek, I did so for [[rocket science]] today, with the caveat that it is a lay term for a set of engineering dis191 KB (30,468 words) - 15:50, 4 January 2009
- ...d) *confused* (Hey, let's do this for a missile, and then it really can be rocket science) [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 00:31, 28 September 200892 KB (15,456 words) - 16:50, 3 November 2008
- ...called my not-quite-bluff, and, for those that question if something is [[rocket science]], an article has been begun. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowit131 KB (22,242 words) - 06:41, 15 March 2011