Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 15 KB (2,118 words) - 12:00, 13 July 2024
- Statistical significance:<br/> .../full/130/12/1005}}</ref> Bayesian inference formalizes this approach to [[statistical significance]].55 KB (7,444 words) - 06:21, 29 August 2013
- ...e strongest among those who are severely obese, and female (in the latter, statistical significance was reached in NZ and Lebanon). Results reveal differences between the cou13 KB (1,805 words) - 02:37, 16 February 2010
- Statistical significance:<br/> .../full/130/12/1005}}</ref> Bayesian inference formalizes this approach to [[statistical significance]].63 KB (8,794 words) - 12:00, 14 August 2024
- {{main|Statistics|Statistical significance}} ...> exist for assessing the importance of subgroups. In brief, testing the [[statistical significance]] of an interaction (e.g. statistical heterogeneity) between subgroups and79 KB (10,925 words) - 14:12, 2 February 2023
- {{main|Statistics|Statistical significance}} ...> exist for assessing the importance of subgroups. In brief, testing the [[statistical significance]] of an interaction (e.g. statistical heterogeneity) between subgroups and87 KB (12,105 words) - 14:08, 2 February 2023
- ...analyses may be prone to false positive results due to repeated tests of [[statistical significance]].<ref name="pmid18083463">{{cite journal| author=Wetterslev J, Thorlund K,73 KB (9,974 words) - 07:01, 18 September 2024
- ...]=1.39<br/>• [[Histamine H2 antagonist]]s [[Hazard ratio|HR]]=1.14 ([[Statistical significance|insignicant]])26 KB (3,487 words) - 14:06, 2 February 2023
- ...days of mupirocin treatment (4/27). Although these results did not reach [[statistical significance]], the baths are easy to do.26 KB (3,503 words) - 17:00, 5 July 2024
- ...ear=2007 |pmid=17509426 |doi=10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.08.004}}</ref>, found [[statistical significance|statistically insignificant]] trends towards benefit.-->25 KB (3,379 words) - 17:00, 1 August 2024
- ...data, and could not render a more definitive conclusion because of lack of statistical significance, despite a very large sample-size in the analysis. They also used the phras35 KB (5,117 words) - 08:59, 7 September 2024
- ...ls, quantitative results may be overstated either because p-values without statistical significance are interpreted as refuting the null hypothesis<ref>{{Cite journal31 KB (4,297 words) - 14:32, 12 September 2024
- ...ic shock increased 3.9% to 5%. <br/>Stroke increased from 1% to 1.1% (no [[statistical significance]])35 KB (4,633 words) - 17:00, 6 July 2024
- ...one]] increased [[akathisia]] (see table for benefits which did not have [[statistical significance]]).<ref name="pmid20095068"/>46 KB (6,361 words) - 07:00, 3 August 2024
- ...in the combination therapy group did not reach the predetermined level of statistical significance".<ref name="pmid17314337"/>46 KB (6,357 words) - 10:53, 25 September 2024
- ...nd the [[relative risk reduction]] was 15.0%. This finding did not reach [[statistical significance]]<ref name="pmid22895954"/> Similarly, intensive blood-pressure control ("a53 KB (7,061 words) - 12:01, 30 August 2024
- ...ion based on study design features, magnitude of the stimulatory response, statistical significance, and reproducibility of findings.</ref> <ref name=calabresemed>Calabrese EJ44 KB (6,411 words) - 07:01, 29 August 2024
- ...ound that none improved functioning, care needs, or quality of life with [[statistical significance]]<ref name="pmid17035647"/>; however, olanzapine and risperidone may reduce51 KB (6,992 words) - 07:00, 6 August 2024
- ...d of regression to normoglycaemia"<br/>• Rosiglitazone did not [[statistical significance|significantly]] decrease death<br/>• Rosiglitazone increased [[he98 KB (13,474 words) - 17:00, 6 August 2024