Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • 15 KB (2,114 words) - 11:38, 15 June 2024
  • Statistical significance:<br/> .../full/130/12/1005}}</ref> Bayesian inference formalizes this approach to [[statistical significance]].
    55 KB (7,444 words) - 06:21, 29 August 2013
  • ...e strongest among those who are severely obese, and female (in the latter, statistical significance was reached in NZ and Lebanon). Results reveal differences between the cou
    13 KB (1,805 words) - 02:37, 16 February 2010
  • Statistical significance:<br/> .../full/130/12/1005}}</ref> Bayesian inference formalizes this approach to [[statistical significance]].
    63 KB (8,790 words) - 06:57, 2 March 2021
  • {{main|Statistics|Statistical significance}} ...> exist for assessing the importance of subgroups. In brief, testing the [[statistical significance]] of an interaction (e.g. statistical heterogeneity) between subgroups and
    79 KB (10,925 words) - 14:12, 2 February 2023
  • {{main|Statistics|Statistical significance}} ...> exist for assessing the importance of subgroups. In brief, testing the [[statistical significance]] of an interaction (e.g. statistical heterogeneity) between subgroups and
    87 KB (12,105 words) - 14:08, 2 February 2023
  • ...analyses may be prone to false positive results due to repeated tests of [[statistical significance]].<ref name="pmid18083463">{{cite journal| author=Wetterslev J, Thorlund K,
    73 KB (9,970 words) - 13:21, 2 February 2023
  • ...]=1.39<br/>&bull; [[Histamine H2 antagonist]]s [[Hazard ratio|HR]]=1.14 ([[Statistical significance|insignicant]])
    26 KB (3,487 words) - 14:06, 2 February 2023
  • ...days of mupirocin treatment (4/27). Although these results did not reach [[statistical significance]], the baths are easy to do.
    26 KB (3,499 words) - 07:59, 4 May 2024
  • ...ear=2007 |pmid=17509426 |doi=10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.08.004}}</ref>, found [[statistical significance|statistically insignificant]] trends towards benefit.-->
    25 KB (3,375 words) - 22:06, 17 October 2016
  • ...data, and could not render a more definitive conclusion because of lack of statistical significance, despite a very large sample-size in the analysis. They also used the phras
    35 KB (5,116 words) - 12:48, 16 June 2024
  • ...ls, quantitative results may be overstated either because p-values without statistical significance are interpreted as refuting the null hypothesis<ref>{{Cite journal
    32 KB (4,430 words) - 08:23, 27 September 2012
  • ...ic shock increased 3.9% to 5%. <br/>Stroke increased from 1% to 1.1% (no [[statistical significance]])
    35 KB (4,629 words) - 08:41, 6 May 2024
  • ...one]] increased [[akathisia]] (see table for benefits which did not have [[statistical significance]]).<ref name="pmid20095068"/>
    46 KB (6,357 words) - 17:48, 17 June 2024
  • ...in the combination therapy group did not reach the predetermined level of statistical significance".<ref name="pmid17314337">{{cite journal |author=Calverley PM, Anderson JA,
    48 KB (6,593 words) - 11:52, 2 February 2023
  • ...nd the [[relative risk reduction]] was 15.0%. This finding did not reach [[statistical significance]]<ref name="pmid22895954"/> Similarly, intensive blood-pressure control ("a
    53 KB (7,057 words) - 13:53, 5 June 2024
  • ...ion based on study design features, magnitude of the stimulatory response, statistical significance, and reproducibility of findings.</ref> <ref name=calabresemed>Calabrese EJ
    44 KB (6,407 words) - 15:57, 24 June 2015
  • ...ound that none improved functioning, care needs, or quality of life with [[statistical significance]]<ref name="pmid17035647"/>; however, olanzapine and risperidone may reduce
    51 KB (6,994 words) - 18:19, 17 June 2024
  • ...d of regression to normoglycaemia"<br/>&bull;&nbsp;Rosiglitazone did not [[statistical significance|significantly]] decrease death<br/>&bull;&nbsp;Rosiglitazone increased [[he
    98 KB (13,470 words) - 13:28, 10 February 2023
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)