Search results

...scientific progress." <ref>[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/ Thomas Kuhn] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref> According to such opinions, scie ...that+hesitates+to+forget+its+founders+is+lost&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0 ''Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times''] by Steve Fuller (2000), Universit

==On Thomas Kuhn== ...ato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/ The Stanford Encyclopedia Article on Thomas Kuhn]

...the history of science.<ref name="Swerdlow">N. M. Swerdlow, ''An Essay on Thomas Kuhn’s First Scientific Revolution, The Copernican Revolution'', Proceedings o ...ting chain of events in the history of science as seen through the eyes of Thomas Kuhn.

An example is the idea of a ''paradigm'' as described by [[Thomas Kuhn]] in his book [[The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]].<ref name=Guzzini {{cite web |author=Alexander Bird |title=Thomas Kuhn: §3: The concept of a paradigm |work=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (

*[[Thomas Kuhn]], ''The structure of scientific revolutions'', 1962, vol.2 n.2 ...rk published in the ''International Encyclopedia of Unified Science'' is [[Thomas Kuhn]]'s ''[[The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]]''. However, every entry i

The evolution of science forms part of this discussion. For example, [[Thomas Kuhn]] connected changes in scientists' views of reality to "revolutions" in sci Five somewhat similar criteria were proposed by [[Thomas Kuhn|Kuhn]] as what he called "the shared basis for theory choice", a list selec

...heory acceptance is a practical issue. This view resembles to the model of Thomas Kuhn, who is however not considered to be a positivist (see later). {{main|Thomas Kuhn}}

[[Thomas Kuhn]] formally stated this need for the "norms for rational theory choice". One

{{rpr|Thomas Kuhn}}

[[Thomas Kuhn]]'s influential book ''[[The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]]'' argued

...d in the book ''Personal Knowledge''. and he influenced, amongst others, [[Thomas Kuhn]], [[Paul Feyerbend]] and [[Imre Lakatos]].

*[[Thomas Kuhn]], ''The structure of scientific revolutions'', 1962, vol.2 n.2

[[Thomas Kuhn]] denied that it is ''ever'' possible to isolate the theory being tested fr

[[Thomas Kuhn]] saw a circularity in this, and questioned whether a field makes progress ...n lines of thinking (see also [[scientific method]], [[Karl Popper]] and [[Thomas Kuhn]] for further discussion).

...'The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.'' (1962, 1970); Steven Fuller, ''Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times'' (2000)</ref>

...e new concepts is necessary for the scientific revolutions considered by [[Thomas Kuhn]] <ref> T.S.Kuhn. ''The Structure of Scientific Revolutions''. 2nd. ed., Ch

[[Thomas Kuhn]]’s well-known ''[[The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]]'' was publis

==Responses to Popper: Thomas Kuhn and the Science Wars== Popper's views were in marked contrast to those of his contemporary, [[Thomas Kuhn]] (1922-1996). Kuhn's own book ''The Structure of Scientific Revolutions''

==Responses to Popper: Thomas Kuhn and the Science Wars== Popper's views were in marked contrast to those of his contemporary, [[Thomas Kuhn]] (1922-1996). Kuhn's own book ''The Structure of Scientific Revolutions''

...y comparing their two languages and trying to find proper translations, as Thomas Kuhn suggested, and acknowledge when there is [[incommensurability]] :