Search results

{{r|PageRank}}

{{r|PageRank}}

* [[CZ:PageRank analysis of Citizendium articles|PageRank analysis]]

{{r|PageRank}}

...s well as my other Google ranking assessment (which wasn't as accurate as "PageRank").--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 03:02, 22 March 2010

...rategy here. It's a legitimate way to create a ''link farm'' to increase [[PageRank]] and bring [[Google Juice]] to us. But it involves a LOT of work. Writing ...oogling my ''[[Aeneid]]'' article to see where it comes up, or what it's [[PageRank]] is. At least I'm trying.

...rust.cse.ucsc.edu/ Mediawiki trust metric], maybe paired with some sort of pagerank-esque ranking to weight work on prominent pages more heavily. Unfortunately

...to understand stuff, and made new drawings to illustrate concepts such as PageRank and link farm. Will try to improve this article in future. Not sure if I'm

...king for the old site. Additionally, some groups try to make use of the [[PageRank]] accumulated by being the target of the dead links.

===Pagerank and its variations=== Bollen ''et al''. proposed using the [[PageRank]] algorithm used by [[Google]] to distinguish the "quality" of citations an

...us with much [[necessity|needed]] [[Google Juice]] which helps boost our [[PageRank]] on [[Google]] searches and helps [[Citizendium]] appear earlier on a user ...s from other sites (best: highly ranked ones) help to increase the overall PageRank of CZ pages. Interwiki links may only shift the [[weight]] from one page to

...could determine which links were ''stronger'' than others, since a higher PageRank page is more likely to be reached by the random surfer. ...gram with different colored circles with percentages and arrows.|Google's "PageRank" method seeks to determine the most relevant web sites by tracing links. <s

...<br/>(searches performed in 2004(?)|| Precision of first 50 citations:<br/>PageRank 9%<br/>Citation count 8%<br/>Impact factor 2%|| "Citation-based algorithms ===Citation analysis or PageRank===

...is lackluster) that we better have a good reason why it makes sense. On my PageRank studies, I routinely found "Related articles" pages coming to the forefront

...RC342-2N/2/63e7d8fb6a64027a0c15e6ae3e402889}}</ref> Their [[patent]] for [[PageRank]] was filed in 1998 and issued in 2001.<ref>Page L. (2001) Method for node

...thickets equal, by creating at the same time. Then after a month, we do a PageRank analysis and see which one had a higher score. Wondering what you think? I' ...t be a distorting factor hopefully). And then waiting a month and checking PageRank. Would this work? And would it be conclusive and persuasive?--[[User:Thomas

Models based on analysis of the links include [[PageRank]], HITS, and [[impact factor]].<ref name="isbn0321416910"/> {{main|PageRank|Impact factor}}

...edia doesn't block off userspace (it's easily searched) and WP wins in the PageRank battle. I can find my userspace on WP by searching Google; but I can't find ==PageRank experiment==

...e is of the draft version? The biology article is a "hot" one here at CZ, (PageRank = 4 I think) and based on what I'm learning about crawlers and [[SEO]], I ...ded information. The draft article, along with the approved article, has a PageRank of 4. Not bad. --[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 03:13,

==PageRank experiment== ...er talk:Thomas Wright Sulcer/sandbox11|Experiment -- CZ articles by Google Pagerank]] I did a mini-study of CZ articles chosen randomly, from different author