Talk:Introduction to quantum mechanics
The metadata subpage is missing. You can start it via filling in this form or by following the instructions that come up after clicking on the [show] link to the right. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Proposal
I propose that people that are knowledgeable about quantum mechanics list here topics that should be included in an article on quantum mechanics for the layperson. (Maybe that would be a better title of this article?). I hope that skilled (possibly, or even preferably, non-science) writers pick this up and make a readable, consistent, article out of it. If they slip or misunderstand something don't worry, that has happened to every learner of QM. --Paul Wormer 12:19, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- Recall we have a Student Level subpage that has not been utilized much yet. Such an article would live at Quantum mechanics/Student Level. One problem is I'm not sure we have really defined the role of this subpage, although I would think aiming it at the layperson should be the target. Chris Day 12:31, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- I was not thinking of students, but of journalists and of other interested adults that want to widen their horizon, but it could be useful to (non-physics) students as well. --Paul Wormer 12:38, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- Maybe we need to rename that subpage. It might be used more if it was more of an outreach article rather than aimed at students. After all what does student mean, it could refer to many different levels of expertise. Chris Day 12:43, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- Yes, I agree, "student" reminds one of college and exams. I was thinking of general education (more along the the ideals of Enlightenment). --Paul Wormer 12:51, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- Maybe it should be called something like, "Introductory" or "Prequisite". "Fundamentals"? Just tossing out ideas here. --Robert W King 12:54, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
I'm going to disagree with you all and claim that since we are an encyclopaedia aimed at a general readership, Quantum mechanics itself should be the introductory article, and more specialist material should be elsewhere. J. Noel Chiappa 12:58, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
Historical approach?
An approach could be historical (I write this from memory, I'm without books):
- Around 1890 physics is "finished", minor detail: UV catastrophe.
- 1900 Planck solves UV catastrophe by quantizing the energy of harmonic oscillator (Insert here: explanation harmonic oscillator and its use in physical models).
- 1905 Einstein proposes that light consists of virtual quantized oscillators to explain photoelectric effect
- Around 1910 quantization lattice vibrations (Einstein Debye crystal)
- 1913 Bohr atom
- 1915 Old Bohr-Sommerfeld quantum theory
- 1924 de Broglie: (very very light) particle shows wave properties (insert about waves)
- 1925 Heisenberg, Born, Jordan: matrix mechanics (insert about matrices)
- 1926 Schroedinger wave equations (time-independent, time-dependent), relation with matrix mechanics
- 1926 Spin
- 1927 Pauli exclusion principle, Heisenberg uncertainty relation. Non-relativistic QM essentially finished at this point in time.
--Paul Wormer 12:38, 1 April 2008 (CDT)