Talk:Young earth creationism
Workgroup category or categories | Religion Workgroup, Philosophy Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Matt Innis (Talk) 21:48, 25 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Unless the author quickly replaces this initial text with a scholarly introduction - or puts a bibliography here on the discusion page I believe this article should be speedily deleted. Citizendium is a compendium of knowlege and starting a new article requires a committment to scholarship, especially when it is a controversial topic. Nancy Sculerati 17:13, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
- I've expanded it, and the article needs editors' help. Thanks! PLEASE do not turn this article into a diatribe against young earth creationism. It should be neutral. Yi Zhe Wu 21:09, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
if true THEN 7 days
literally true means 7 days. Robert Tito | Talk
- The article needs to be neutral, please do not turn it into a diatribe. Yi Zhe Wu 21:09, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- literally seems to be what it says, literally.
By the way, one cannot invent physical properties, only apply them. Robert Tito | Talk 21:11, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
one question
can somebody explain to me the role of biology in young earth creationism? That seems quite inappropriate to put biology in creationism. Robert Tito | Talk 21:24, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- Because the young earth creationism does address some issues about origin of organisms, which is within the purview of biology. But I'm not sure. If the biology workgroup guys have the consensus to remove the workgroup designation, they are free to do so. Yi Zhe Wu 21:30, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- never mind Robert Tito | Talk 21:40, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- Sorry if I write something wrong there, I'm only a teenager, not an expert in anything. Yi Zhe Wu 21:44, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- I've removed the word 'theory' and altered a phrase to distance science from any suggestion that it could be a submissable claim. John Stephenson 22:28, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- And the reason is...? Yi Zhe Wu 22:32, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- I've removed the word 'theory' and altered a phrase to distance science from any suggestion that it could be a submissable claim. John Stephenson 22:28, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- Sorry if I write something wrong there, I'm only a teenager, not an expert in anything. Yi Zhe Wu 21:44, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- never mind Robert Tito | Talk 21:40, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- Religion Category Check
- General Category Check
- Philosophy Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Religion Advanced Articles
- Religion Nonstub Articles
- Religion Internal Articles
- Philosophy Advanced Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Religion Developed Articles
- Philosophy Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Religion Developing Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Religion Stub Articles
- Philosophy Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Religion External Articles
- Philosophy External Articles
- Religion Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Philosophy Underlinked Articles
- Religion Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Philosophy Cleanup
- Cleanup