Nuclear power reconsidered/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→The Renewables Only debate: add Heard 2017 to list) |
(→The Renewables Only debate: change citations to Citizendium's preferred style) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== The Renewables Only debate == | == The Renewables Only debate == | ||
*Derek Abbott | *Derek Abbott (2011) Is Nuclear Power Globally Scalable? [https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6021978 ''Proceedings of the IEEE'' 99:1611-17] [http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2161806 dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2161806] A paper frequently quoted by anti-nuclear advocates, alleging fifteen "fundamental engineering and resource scaling limits that make the notion of a nuclear utopia somewhat impractical". | ||
*{{cite book|author=Mark Z. Jacobson|title=100% Clean, Renewable Energy and Storage for Everything|edition=|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2020|id=ISBN 1108790836}} | *{{cite book|author=Mark Z. Jacobson|title=100% Clean, Renewable Energy and Storage for Everything|edition=|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2020|id=ISBN 1108790836}} | ||
**Christopher Clack' | **Christopher Clack ''et al.'' (2017) critique of Jacobson's 100% Renewables Proposal [https://www.pnas.org/content/114/26/6722.full ''Proc. National Academy of Sciences'' 114(26):6722-27]. | ||
**[http://www.roadmaptonowhere.com Roadmap to Nowhere] | **Mike Conley, Tim Maloney (2017) [http://www.roadmaptonowhere.com Roadmap to Nowhere] critique of Jacobson’s Roadmap. | ||
*Heard BP ''et al.'' (2017) Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems ''Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews'' 76:1122–33 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114 dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114] | *Heard BP ''et al.'' (2017) Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems ''Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews'' 76:1122–33 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114 dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114] | ||
*Edwin Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists | |||
**Kurt Smithpeters | *Edwin Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists (2021) [https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/ucs-rpt-AR-3.21-web_Mayrev.pdf ''Advanced Isn’t Always Better''] ''Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors''. | ||
* | **Kurt Smithpeters (2022) critique of Lyman’s UCS paper [https://ses1sez.substack.com/p/advanced-nuclear-reactors ses1sez.substack.com]. | ||
**Dan Yurman's | |||
*Charles McCombie | *Krall LM ''et al.'' (2022) Nuclear waste from small modular reactors [https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2111833119 ''Proc. National Academy of Sciences'' 119(23):e2111833119] [https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111833119 doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111833119]. | ||
**Dan Yurman (2022) Stanford's Questionable Study on Spent Nuclear Fuel for SMRs, [https://neutronbytes.com/2022/05/31/stanfords-questionable-study-on-spent-nuclear-fuel-for-smrs neutronbytes.com/2022/05/31]. | |||
*Charles McCombie ''et al.'' (2022) SMRs: a big game changer? [https://www.neimagazine.com/features/featuresmrs-a-big-game-changer-9694455 ''Nuclear Engineering International'', April 2022, pp.19-23.] A discussion of the political barriers to acceptance of the new reactors. | |||
*Iida Ruishalme, [https://thoughtscapism.com/climate-and-energy/ Thoughtscapism - Climate and Energy] excellent science, excellent graphics, and excellent writing. | *Iida Ruishalme, [https://thoughtscapism.com/climate-and-energy/ Thoughtscapism - Climate and Energy] excellent science, excellent graphics, and excellent writing. | ||
Revision as of 07:05, 1 January 2023
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
General References
- World Nuclear Information Library a well-organized authoritative collection of information on nuclear power.
- Our World in Data has a section on Energy and Environment with nice interactive graphics.
- Fission is in Fashion -- Energy Policy with Energy Realism Robert Hargraves, 2022, Self-paced, graphic presentations based on a course at Dartmouth College telling the story of energy from the discovery of fire to the current debate over nuclear fission.
The Renewables Only debate
- Derek Abbott (2011) Is Nuclear Power Globally Scalable? Proceedings of the IEEE 99:1611-17 dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2161806 A paper frequently quoted by anti-nuclear advocates, alleging fifteen "fundamental engineering and resource scaling limits that make the notion of a nuclear utopia somewhat impractical".
- Mark Z. Jacobson (2020). 100% Clean, Renewable Energy and Storage for Everything. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 1108790836.
- Christopher Clack et al. (2017) critique of Jacobson's 100% Renewables Proposal Proc. National Academy of Sciences 114(26):6722-27.
- Mike Conley, Tim Maloney (2017) Roadmap to Nowhere critique of Jacobson’s Roadmap.
- Heard BP et al. (2017) Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 76:1122–33 dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114
- Edwin Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists (2021) Advanced Isn’t Always Better Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors.
- Kurt Smithpeters (2022) critique of Lyman’s UCS paper ses1sez.substack.com.
- Krall LM et al. (2022) Nuclear waste from small modular reactors Proc. National Academy of Sciences 119(23):e2111833119 doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111833119.
- Dan Yurman (2022) Stanford's Questionable Study on Spent Nuclear Fuel for SMRs, neutronbytes.com/2022/05/31.
- Charles McCombie et al. (2022) SMRs: a big game changer? Nuclear Engineering International, April 2022, pp.19-23. A discussion of the political barriers to acceptance of the new reactors.
- Iida Ruishalme, Thoughtscapism - Climate and Energy excellent science, excellent graphics, and excellent writing.
Videos
- Nuclear Power Debate Firing Line 2021 - the best arguments from both sides.
- Pandora's Promise 2013 documentary examines some of the widespread beliefs about the dangers of nuclear energy.
- Why renewables can’t save the planet | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxDanubia 2019. An environmental activist who now supports nuclear power.
- Chernobyl - HBO Miniseries 2019 Emmy and Golden Globe winning miniseries, grossly exaggerates radiation dangers.
- How HBO Got It Wrong On Chernobyl review in Forbes by James Conca, environmental scientist.
- Collection of videos on nuclear power by Gordon McDowell, Canadian videographer.
Safety
Waste Management
Weapon Proliferation
- Kryuchkov et.al. (2011) 'Isotopic Uranium and Plutonium Denaturing as an Effective Method for Nuclear Fuel Proliferation Protection in Open and Closed Fuel Cycles' https://www.doi.org/10.5772/17822 How nuclear fuel can be made useless for bombs by denaturing (diluting fissile isotopes with hard-to-separate non-fissile, e.g. diluting U-235 with U-238) and by adding a radiation barrier (isotopes that will make stolen fuel easy to detect, hard to handle, and make a bomb fizzle, not detonate).
Cost
Reactor Designs
- Advanced Reactors Information System IAEA Database on Advanced Nuclear Power Reactors
- Advance Nuclear Directory Developers, Suppliers, and National Laboratories
- ThorCon Isle details of a complete nuclear power plant.