Nuclear power reconsidered/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→The Renewables Only debate: add link to Thoughtscapism) |
(→The Renewables Only debate: add Heard 2017 to list) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
**Christopher Clack's critique of Jacobson's 100% Renewables Proposal [https://www.pnas.org/content/114/26/6722.full Proc. National Academy of Sciences 2017 114 (26) 6722-6727]. | **Christopher Clack's critique of Jacobson's 100% Renewables Proposal [https://www.pnas.org/content/114/26/6722.full Proc. National Academy of Sciences 2017 114 (26) 6722-6727]. | ||
**[http://www.roadmaptonowhere.com Roadmap to Nowhere] Mike Conley’s website critique of Jacobson’s Roadmap | **[http://www.roadmaptonowhere.com Roadmap to Nowhere] Mike Conley’s website critique of Jacobson’s Roadmap | ||
*Heard BP ''et al.'' (2017) Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems ''Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews'' 76:1122–33 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114 dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114] | |||
*Edwin Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2021, [https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/ucs-rpt-AR-3.21-web_Mayrev.pdf Advanced Isn’t Always Better] "Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors". | *Edwin Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2021, [https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/ucs-rpt-AR-3.21-web_Mayrev.pdf Advanced Isn’t Always Better] "Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors". | ||
**Kurt Smithpeters' critique of Lyman’s UCS paper [https://ses1sez.substack.com/p/advanced-nuclear-reactors ses1sez.substack.com], 07 June 2022. | **Kurt Smithpeters' critique of Lyman’s UCS paper [https://ses1sez.substack.com/p/advanced-nuclear-reactors ses1sez.substack.com], 07 June 2022. |
Revision as of 21:28, 31 December 2022
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
General References
- World Nuclear Information Library a well-organized authoritative collection of information on nuclear power.
- Our World in Data has a section on Energy and Environment with nice interactive graphics.
- Fission is in Fashion -- Energy Policy with Energy Realism Robert Hargraves, 2022, Self-paced, graphic presentations based on a course at Dartmouth College telling the story of energy from the discovery of fire to the current debate over nuclear fission.
The Renewables Only debate
- Derek Abbott, Is Nuclear Power Globally Scalable? Proceedings of the IEEE, October 2011, pp.1611-17. A paper frequently quoted by anti-nuclear advocates, alleging fifteen "fundamental engineering and resource scaling limits that make the notion of a nuclear utopia somewhat impractical".
- Mark Z. Jacobson (2020). 100% Clean, Renewable Energy and Storage for Everything. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 1108790836.
- Christopher Clack's critique of Jacobson's 100% Renewables Proposal Proc. National Academy of Sciences 2017 114 (26) 6722-6727.
- Roadmap to Nowhere Mike Conley’s website critique of Jacobson’s Roadmap
- Heard BP et al. (2017) Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 76:1122–33 dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114
- Edwin Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2021, Advanced Isn’t Always Better "Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors".
- Kurt Smithpeters' critique of Lyman’s UCS paper ses1sez.substack.com, 07 June 2022.
- L.M. Krall, et.al., Nuclear waste from small modular reactors Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol.119, No.23, 31 May 2022.
- Dan Yurman's critique of Stanford's Questionable Study on Spent Nuclear Fuel for SMRs 31 May 2022.
- Charles McCombie, et.al., SMRs: a big game changer? Nuclear Engineering International, April 2022, pp.19-23. - A discussion of the political barriers to acceptance of the new reactors.
- Iida Ruishalme, Thoughtscapism - Climate and Energy excellent science, excellent graphics, and excellent writing.
Videos
- Nuclear Power Debate Firing Line 2021 - the best arguments from both sides.
- Pandora's Promise 2013 documentary examines some of the widespread beliefs about the dangers of nuclear energy.
- Why renewables can’t save the planet | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxDanubia 2019. An environmental activist who now supports nuclear power.
- Chernobyl - HBO Miniseries 2019 Emmy and Golden Globe winning miniseries, grossly exaggerates radiation dangers.
- How HBO Got It Wrong On Chernobyl review in Forbes by James Conca, environmental scientist.
- Collection of videos on nuclear power by Gordon McDowell, Canadian videographer.
Safety
Waste Management
Weapon Proliferation
- Kryuchkov et.al. (2011) 'Isotopic Uranium and Plutonium Denaturing as an Effective Method for Nuclear Fuel Proliferation Protection in Open and Closed Fuel Cycles' https://www.doi.org/10.5772/17822 How nuclear fuel can be made useless for bombs by denaturing (diluting fissile isotopes with hard-to-separate non-fissile, e.g. diluting U-235 with U-238) and by adding a radiation barrier (isotopes that will make stolen fuel easy to detect, hard to handle, and make a bomb fizzle, not detonate).
Cost
Reactor Designs
- Advanced Reactors Information System IAEA Database on Advanced Nuclear Power Reactors
- Advance Nuclear Directory Developers, Suppliers, and National Laboratories
- ThorCon Isle details of a complete nuclear power plant.