Nuclear power reconsidered/Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎The Renewables Only debate: critique of Lyman paper)
Line 11: Line 11:
**[http://www.roadmaptonowhere.com Roadmap to Nowhere] Mike Conley’s website critique of Jacobson’s Roadmap
**[http://www.roadmaptonowhere.com Roadmap to Nowhere] Mike Conley’s website critique of Jacobson’s Roadmap
*Edwin Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2021, [https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/ucs-rpt-AR-3.21-web_Mayrev.pdf Advanced Isn’t Always Better] "Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors".
*Edwin Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2021, [https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/ucs-rpt-AR-3.21-web_Mayrev.pdf Advanced Isn’t Always Better] "Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors".
**[https://ses1sez.substack.com/p/advanced-nuclear-reactors?s=r Critique of Lyman’s UCS paper]
*L.M. Krall, et.al., [https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2111833119 Nuclear waste from small modular reactors] Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol.119, No.23, 31 May 2022.
*L.M. Krall, et.al., [https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2111833119 Nuclear waste from small modular reactors] Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol.119, No.23, 31 May 2022.
**Dan Yurman's critique of [https://neutronbytes.com/2022/05/31/stanfords-questionable-study-on-spent-nuclear-fuel-for-smrs/ Stanford's Questionable Study on Spent Nuclear Fuel for SMRs] 31 May 2022.
**Dan Yurman's critique of [https://neutronbytes.com/2022/05/31/stanfords-questionable-study-on-spent-nuclear-fuel-for-smrs/ Stanford's Questionable Study on Spent Nuclear Fuel for SMRs] 31 May 2022.

Revision as of 21:26, 7 June 2022

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Debate Guide [?]
 
A list of key readings about Nuclear power reconsidered.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.

General References

The Renewables Only debate

Videos

Safety

Waste Management

Weapon Proliferation

  • Kryuchkov et.al. (2011) 'Isotopic Uranium and Plutonium Denaturing as an Effective Method for Nuclear Fuel Proliferation Protection in Open and Closed Fuel Cycles' https://www.doi.org/10.5772/17822 How nuclear fuel can be made useless for bombs by denaturing (diluting fissile isotopes with hard-to-separate non-fissile, e.g. diluting U-235 with U-238) and by adding a radiation barrier (isotopes that will make stolen fuel easy to detect, hard to handle, and make a bomb fizzle, not detonate).

Cost

Reactor Designs

Notes and References