Talk:Congress of Industrial Organizations/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones
(Pulling out my hair.)
imported>Russell D. Jones
(I'm more charitable now; grading papers is getting under my skin)
Line 9: Line 9:
:::I took another read, it looks great, encyclopedic. Is there a reason for the single reference at the top of the bibliography page? I asked the copy editors to take a look and weigh in with a second opinion on the title, we'll give it 10 days? [[User:Stephen Saletta|Stephen Saletta]] 00:15, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
:::I took another read, it looks great, encyclopedic. Is there a reason for the single reference at the top of the bibliography page? I asked the copy editors to take a look and weigh in with a second opinion on the title, we'll give it 10 days? [[User:Stephen Saletta|Stephen Saletta]] 00:15, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
::::I updated the links in the bibliog; the Arneson encyclopedia is more general than anything but it can go in with the others.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 01:07, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
::::I updated the links in the bibliog; the Arneson encyclopedia is more general than anything but it can go in with the others.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 01:07, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
:::This article is poorly written and poorly referenced.  I took a stab at re-writing the 1937-1940 section, but there is just too much general gobbly-gook there that would require a couple of hours of research to clear up.  You've got the formation of the CIO, UAW, USW, URW, the Memorial Day Massacre, the Flint Sit-Down (which is exceptionally sketchy), the Battle of the Overpass. It doesn't even mention that the sit-down was declared illegal.  There's the battle for control of the CIO and UAW.  I'm not going to devote more time to it right now.  --[[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 21:28, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
:::This still reads too much like the poorly-written wikipedia article.  I took a stab at re-writing the 1937-1940 section, but there is just too much general gobbly-gook there that would require a couple of hours of research to clear up.  You've got the formation of the CIO, UAW, USW, URW, the Memorial Day Massacre, the Flint Sit-Down (which is exceptionally sketchy), the Battle of the Overpass. It doesn't mention the 1935 & 1936 URW strikes that pioneered the sit-down, or that the sit-down was ruled illegal by 1941.  There's the battle for control of the CIO and UAW.  I'm not going to devote more time to it right now.  --[[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 21:28, 24 April 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 01:44, 25 April 2008

This article has a Citable Version.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  The Congress of Industrial Organizations was a federation of labor unions that organized workers in industrial unions into the United States and Canada from 1935 to 1955, when it merged with the AFL to form the AFL-CIO. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  History, Politics and Economics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

I thought this article was going to be about Chief Information Officers. Question, then: at what names shall we put this article, the article about Chief Information Officers, and what should reside at "CIO"? Notice, "CIO" is also the name of a magazine. Cf. also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIO What do you think? --Larry Sanger 10:38, 1 May 2007 (CDT)

CIO is the common name for 70 years of one of the largest and best known organizations in American history. I think we can disambiguate when we have another article with similar title. Note that Wiki at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIO does a TERRIBLE job on disambiguation here (the union is listed twice, both incorrectly, and AFL-CIO is missed); this list lacks a meaningful order. And they miss Comité International Olympique . Richard Jensen 12:59, 1 May 2007 (CDT)

At first blush, this article is looking pretty good... any thoughts on moving towards approval? Stephen Saletta 21:59, 17 April 2008 (CDT)

yes it is ready. I just fixed the bibliog. please nomnate. :) Richard Jensen 23:08, 17 April 2008 (CDT)
I took another read, it looks great, encyclopedic. Is there a reason for the single reference at the top of the bibliography page? I asked the copy editors to take a look and weigh in with a second opinion on the title, we'll give it 10 days? Stephen Saletta 00:15, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
I updated the links in the bibliog; the Arneson encyclopedia is more general than anything but it can go in with the others.Richard Jensen 01:07, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
This still reads too much like the poorly-written wikipedia article. I took a stab at re-writing the 1937-1940 section, but there is just too much general gobbly-gook there that would require a couple of hours of research to clear up. You've got the formation of the CIO, UAW, USW, URW, the Memorial Day Massacre, the Flint Sit-Down (which is exceptionally sketchy), the Battle of the Overpass. It doesn't mention the 1935 & 1936 URW strikes that pioneered the sit-down, or that the sit-down was ruled illegal by 1941. There's the battle for control of the CIO and UAW. I'm not going to devote more time to it right now. --Russell D. Jones 21:28, 24 April 2008 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Congress_of_Industrial_Organizations/Draft&oldid=847581"