CZ Talk:Election July-August 2013/Referenda/9: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews (joint capacity rather than joint councils) |
imported>Peter Jackson |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Allowing an individual can be elected to serve in either in one office or in both offices, that is a better idea than confounding structural functions. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 14:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC) | Allowing an individual can be elected to serve in either in one office or in both offices, that is a better idea than confounding structural functions. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 14:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
:I think you've posted this on the wrong page. It looks like a comment on Referendum 1. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 16:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:51, 25 July 2013
Pros and cons
Although the basis for combining the councils is a lack of bodies to fill the positions, that is not really a good argument.
The two councils have different functions. Capacities needed in one area, for example, editor, are different from those in the other area. A potential candidate may be viewed, or view themselves, better adapted to one rather than the other capacity.
Allowing an individual can be elected to serve in either in one office or in both offices, that is a better idea than confounding structural functions. John R. Brews 14:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- I think you've posted this on the wrong page. It looks like a comment on Referendum 1. Peter Jackson 16:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)