CZ:Election July-August 2013/Referenda/9: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson (Created page with "If the proposed referendum to amalgamate the Councils is passed, add the following provision to the transitional Article 50 (perhaps at the end of section 3 of the Vacancies head...") |
imported>Peter Jackson (oops!) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
"As far as possible, in making interim appointments the Managing Editor or Council shall establish and/or maintain a majority of Editors on the Council, and, subject to that priority, as many non-Editors as possible." | "As far as possible, in making interim appointments the Managing Editor or Council shall establish and/or maintain a majority of Editors on the Council, and, subject to that priority, as many non-Editors as possible." | ||
I recognize this may not be possible owing to shortage of candidates and/or existing Council members carried over, hence the weak wording. The priority phrasing means, for a Council of 5, the order of preference for number of Editors is 3, 4, 5, 2, 1. | I recognize this may not be possible owing to shortage of candidates and/or existing Council members carried over, hence the weak wording. The priority phrasing means, for a Council of 5, the order of preference for number of Editors is 3, 4, 5, 2, 1, 0. | ||
Revision as of 11:52, 25 July 2013
If the proposed referendum to amalgamate the Councils is passed, add the following provision to the transitional Article 50 (perhaps at the end of section 3 of the Vacancies heading).
"As far as possible, in making interim appointments the Managing Editor or Council shall establish and/or maintain a majority of Editors on the Council, and, subject to that priority, as many non-Editors as possible."
I recognize this may not be possible owing to shortage of candidates and/or existing Council members carried over, hence the weak wording. The priority phrasing means, for a Council of 5, the order of preference for number of Editors is 3, 4, 5, 2, 1, 0.