Human rights/Tutorials: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
they have had an enormous influence upon the understanding of the concept of human rights, as a result of which their influence  is likely to increase
they have had an enormous influence upon the understanding of the concept of human rights, as a result of which their influence  is likely to increase
<ref>[http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WGJdzmYOQfEC&pg=PA1&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false  
<ref>[http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WGJdzmYOQfEC&pg=PA1&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false  
Christof Heyns and Frans. Viljoen: ''The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level'', Kluwer Law International, 2003 (Google books extract)]</ref>.
Christof Heyns and Frans. Viljoen: ''The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level'', Kluwer Law International, 2003 (Google books extract)]</ref>. Thomas Risse sees
 
the improvement of human rights as a five-stage process, starting from (i) "unconstrained repression", followed by (ii) denial, eg as an unwarranted intrusion into national sovereignty, (iii) "tactical concessions" such as the release of some political prisoners, (iv) "prescriptive status" involving lip service to human rights principles, and finally (v) "rule-consistent behaviour" involving their active implementation <ref>[http://www.irisprojects.umd.edu/ppc_ideas/ebulletin/issue2_pdf/socialization_of_international_norms_into_domestic_practices.pdf Thomas Risse: ''The Socialization of International Norms into Domestic
<ref>[http://www.irisprojects.umd.edu/ppc_ideas/ebulletin/issue2_pdf/socialization_of_international_norms_into_domestic_practices.pdf Thomas Risse: ''The Socialization of International Norms into Domestic
Practices: Arguing and Strategic Adaptation in the Human Rights Area'', (Paper presented at the Ideas, Culture and Political Analysis Workshop, Princeton University, May 15-16 1998)]</ref>.
Practices: Arguing and Strategic Adaptation in the Human Rights Area'', (Paper presented at the Ideas, Culture and Political Analysis Workshop, Princeton University, May 15-16 1998)]</ref>





Revision as of 04:02, 29 August 2012

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Tutorials [?]
Addendum [?]
 
Tutorials relating to the topic of Human rights.

Studies of the impact of the human rights treaties

The impact of the treaties has been characterised by long delays between commitment and implementation. According to the authors of a 1999 study of the impact of the United Nations treaties, they have had an enormous influence upon the understanding of the concept of human rights, as a result of which their influence is likely to increase [1]. Thomas Risse sees the improvement of human rights as a five-stage process, starting from (i) "unconstrained repression", followed by (ii) denial, eg as an unwarranted intrusion into national sovereignty, (iii) "tactical concessions" such as the release of some political prisoners, (iv) "prescriptive status" involving lip service to human rights principles, and finally (v) "rule-consistent behaviour" involving their active implementation [2].


Linda Keith found that countries that ratified the civil rights treaty often had better human rights records than those that do not [3]. Oona Hathaway also found that ratifying countries had better records than non-ratifying countries, but that ratification is sometimes associated with worse performance [4]. Emilie Hafner-Burton and Kiyatero Tsutsui found that there were better human rights records in democracies, developed countries and countries whose citizens take part in civil rights movements. [5]. Eric Neumayer found that ratification improved performance depending upon the extent of democracy and the strength of civil society [6].

References