Poverty and obesity

All unapproved Citizendium articles may contain errors of fact, bias, grammar etc. A version of an article is unapproved unless it is marked as citable with a dedicated green template at the top of the page, as in this version of the 'Biology' article. Citable articles are intended to be of reasonably high quality. The participants in the Citizendium project make no representations about the reliability of Citizendium articles or, generally, their suitability for any purpose. This article is currently being developed as part of an Eduzendium student project in the framework of a course entitled Appetite and Obesity at Edinburgh University. The course homepage can be found at CZ:UoE Appetite and Obesity 2011. For the course duration, the article is closed to outside editing. Of course you can always leave comments on the discussion page. The anticipated date of course completion is 01 April 2012. One month after that date at the latest, this notice shall be removed. Besides, many other Citizendium articles welcome your collaboration!

Introduction

Poverty and obesity are very closely linked. In the USA, the highest rates of obesity occur in the poorest population groups. Poverty is associated with lower expenditure on food, and low consumption of fruit and vegetables, and energy-dense foods represent the lowest-cost option for consumers. However, the high energy density and palatability of sweets and fats are associated with higher energy intakes.

Diet Quality

The Relationship Between Diet Quality and Socio-Economic Status

People of higher socio-economic status (SES) tend to have better quality diets.

What is a good quality diet? What is a bad quality diet? Why is a bad quality diet detrimental to general health? Link to title: obesity is associated with poor diet quality and therefore low SES (or poverty).

[Figure: a food pyramid detailing what a good quality diet should consist of and in what quantities.]

Extra points: 1) Variables to consider – country, ethnic origin, type of SES indicator; and age, sex, occupation, education, income levels. 2) The difference between poverty and low SES? Poverty is more intense…

Evidence for Socio-Economic Status Affecting Diet Quality

Components of the diet: whole grains/refined cereals, fruit and vegetables, milk, lean meat and fish/fatty meat, added fats, sugars, sweetened beverages, fibre and micronutrients (vitamins and minerals), macronutrients (protein, carbohydrate, sucrose, types of fat).

Data selected from studies focussing on one dietary component in high/low income families to compare diet quality to SES.

Causation of Poor Diet Quality in People of Low Socio-Economic Status

Food prices and diet costs, food access and the food environment, education and culture.

Link to energy density and energy cost: in general, low SES causes people to select food of low cost, and these foods tend to be energy dense.

Helen Golz 18:37, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Dietary Energy Density

Influence on energy intakes

Energy dense foods have been shown to result in higher energy intakes overall. It has been found that upon eating any given meal under laboratory conditions, participants consume a constant volume. Therefore, the calorie intake is determined by the energy density of the food eaten. In addition to this, palatable, energy dense foods have also been linked to an attenuation of satiety and ‘passive consumption’, thus resulting in a greater energy intake . Foods with a low energy density, however, give a lasting feeling of satiety and fullness. This effect results in a lower consumption of energy during the meal, and for the rest of that day . Previous literature has postulated that the effect of energy density of foods on energy intake is due to poor human ability to distinguish between high and low energy dense foods. Therefore we do not accommodate for this in our eating habits, thus fail to maintain energy balance .

Function of water content

The energy density of foods (MJ/kg) is determined by their water content, whereby energy dilute foods are well hydrated, and energy dense foods are comparably dry. Energy dense foods may also contain fat, sugar and starch, and include foodstuffs such a s crisps, with an energy density of 23MJ/kg and chocolate (22MJ/kg). Examples of foods with a low energy density are fruits and vegetables .

Palatability of energy dense foods

Energy-dense foods tend to be more palatable and pleasurable to eat than foods with a low energy density. Animal studies have shown that sugar and fat stimulate reward centres in brain, resulting in taste preference. It has been proposed that humans, and other animals, developed a taste preference for energy dense foods in order to promote their survival in an environment where food can be scarce and unreliable. Conversely, it has also been suggested that human taste preference for energy dense foods is acquired during early life from their environment. This preference can be developed through repeated exposure, an association with the metabolic consequences, or parental influence.

Hannah Harman 09:43, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Energy Costs

The Relationship Between Energy Density and Energy Cost

There is an apparent inverse relationship between the energy density of foods and the energy cost of food. This meaning that energy dense foods are cheaper for food consumption then the 'healthier' less energy dense food substances.

Its is observed that diets which are high in fats, sugars and grains are associated with lower diet costs and are an effective way of saving money but still satisfying the need for food.

French studies have shown that for every additional 100g of sweets and fats there was a 0.05 - 0.40 Euro per day reduction in the cost of diet in contrast to each 100g additional portion of fruit and vegetables there was a 0.18 - 0.29 Euro per day increase in dietary costs.

Studies have also shown evidence that in America obesity is an economic issue, rather than a medical, education or genetic issue.

Pricing of Foods and Influence of Income/SES

It is well known that fats and sugars at a very low cost provide dietary energy. Therefore price reduction studies were carried out on alternative foods to investigate whether a reduction in price would see an increase in the consumption of foods such as lower fat foods and fresh fruits.

Other studies carried out include those where an increase on high sugar/fat foods price caused a reduction in consumption. This can then be further enhanced into a larger context and if taxes were applied to such foods would we see any significant change in BMI or obesity prevalence across the population. We may see a reduction in the consumption but does this directly relate to a decrease in weight?

Thus

Are the economic constraints contributing to the unhealthy food choices made by the communities in the lower SES in the developed worlds of today?

Discussion

discussion about general trends regarding relationship between poverty and obesity. Future initiatives and solutions etc. conclusion of article.??

notes/draft so far:

For the most part limited economic resources may shift dietary choices towards an energy-dense, highly palatable diet that involves a high amount of calories per the least volume and ultimately, the least cost. These diets are most likely to contain added sugars and vegetable fats and those from a low socioeconomic status are the most at risk. In addition poverty has been linked to lower physical activity, lack of nutritional education, poorer access to healthcare, greater exposure to marketing of unhealthy foods, and high stress levels .The appropriate built environment allows the individual adequate access to gyms, parks and healthy food options as opposed to an area with an abundance of fast food restaurants and limited recreational facilities. In many cases, poorer areas are most closely situated to clusters of fast food eateries where there is a lack of healthy choices and often in unsafe neighbourhoods there is a tendency to avoid outdoor activity. Studies also suggest that those living in high poverty areas are more likely to watch TV.

Overall, research linking poverty and obesity is more consistent for women and children than men of low socioeconomic status but the research has shown varying results in regards to ethnicity and general trends over the last few decades. The CDC in the US highlight that obesity is higher in minority groups (with the exception of Asian-Americans). In non-hispanic white women, obesity was found to increase as income decreased whereas in non-hispanic black and Mexican-American men obesity decreased as income increased. Although the prevalence of obesity among women with income below the poverty level is higher than among those with higher incomes, most obese women do not have incomes below the poverty level. General obesity trends have shown that between 1986-2002, BMI was increasingly higher in low income groups than high income groups and recently a persons salary was found to be inversely related to BMI and obesity. However in one national study spanning 30 years, the relationship between poverty and obesity weakened among most gender and ethnic groups and especially among women, even though overall obesity prevalence increased considerably. Additionally in some studies obesity rates were found to increase over all income groups and for instance between 1992 and 2008, obesity prevalence increased by 42.3 percent for the lower income group compared to 88.5 percent for the higher income group. This may suggest that the gaps between low and high income groups may be closing over time as more of the higher income population become obese. Yet some may argue that being poor gives you a very unfair disadvantage. Drewonski