File talk:Venn Diagrams.PNG: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (rectangular cuts) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Rims: comments) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Rims == | == Rims == | ||
I agree that it is good to make it clear what the role of the rims is in these visualizations, but I don't think rectangular cuts are the way to go. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 02:39, 10 July 2011 (UTC) | I agree that it is good to make it clear what the role of the rims is in these visualizations, but I don't think rectangular cuts are the way to go. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 02:39, 10 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
: If you are talking about the rectangular "universal" set then I agree: It is irrelevant and should therefore be omitted. | |||
: If the boundaries are used to identify the "red" and the "blue" set then the '''complete''' coloured circles have to be present in all diagrams. | |||
: For my taste the boundaries are much too thick -- they should be only thick enough to clearly show their colours. | |||
: In the formulas, the symbols for the binary operations are too big. Compare | |||
:: <math> A \cap B, A \cup B, A \setminus B </math> | |||
: Instead of one picture with 3 diagrams, three separate pictures would be more useful. Perhaps with circles of different size (and the forumla as abover or below. In addition, | |||
:: a diagram for <math> A \subset B</math> and (perhaps) also for the relative complement <math> \complement_B A</math> | |||
: in the same graphical design would be useful. | |||
: --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 14:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:56, 10 July 2011
Rims
I agree that it is good to make it clear what the role of the rims is in these visualizations, but I don't think rectangular cuts are the way to go. --Daniel Mietchen 02:39, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- If you are talking about the rectangular "universal" set then I agree: It is irrelevant and should therefore be omitted.
- If the boundaries are used to identify the "red" and the "blue" set then the complete coloured circles have to be present in all diagrams.
- For my taste the boundaries are much too thick -- they should be only thick enough to clearly show their colours.
- In the formulas, the symbols for the binary operations are too big. Compare
- Instead of one picture with 3 diagrams, three separate pictures would be more useful. Perhaps with circles of different size (and the forumla as abover or below. In addition,
- a diagram for and (perhaps) also for the relative complement
- in the same graphical design would be useful.
- --Peter Schmitt 14:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)