User:Anthony.Sebastian/Proposal to recruit academics/Talk page: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian No edit summary |
imported>Russell D. Jones (Some thoughts) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Welcoming comments on [[User:Anthony.Sebastian/Proposal to recruit academics]]: | Welcoming comments on [[User:Anthony.Sebastian/Proposal to recruit academics]]: | ||
re: 'Until approved they will be labeled as "preprints", or "article in progress."' | |||
::We already have something called "Draft" pages. Could not this work? [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] ([[User talk:Russell D. Jones|talk]]) 23:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
re: random thoughts while reading it:<br \> | |||
::Some of this proposal seems like it would act as an individual's blog "my comments on recent scholarship, book reviews, thoughts on the implications of theory x, etc." Also, you bring up at the end, thoughts about "work [being] freely distributed/reproduced with the proviso that it cannot be altered." I think this conflicts with the CC-by-nc 3.0 CC licence we've adopted. I don't think you're proposing to change copyright licence, are you? [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] ([[User talk:Russell D. Jones|talk]]) 23:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:46, 11 May 2016
This is a draft in User space, not yet ready to go to Citizendium's main space, and not meant to be cited. The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User pages.
Welcoming comments on User:Anthony.Sebastian/Proposal to recruit academics:
re: 'Until approved they will be labeled as "preprints", or "article in progress."'
- We already have something called "Draft" pages. Could not this work? Russell D. Jones (talk) 23:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
re: random thoughts while reading it:
- Some of this proposal seems like it would act as an individual's blog "my comments on recent scholarship, book reviews, thoughts on the implications of theory x, etc." Also, you bring up at the end, thoughts about "work [being] freely distributed/reproduced with the proviso that it cannot be altered." I think this conflicts with the CC-by-nc 3.0 CC licence we've adopted. I don't think you're proposing to change copyright licence, are you? Russell D. Jones (talk) 23:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)