Template:CharterVote2/2/Discussion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis (Do we want the Mangement council to decide this?) |
imported>Russell D. Jones (Comments) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm thinking that if we give the Management Council the right to decide who a Citizen is (without limiting that power), it may be too easy for them to vote out people like Scientologists without having to change the charter. Then the next thing you know it will be homeopaths, then chiropractors :). I'm suggesting that we only have numbers 2 and 3 as requirements for citizenship. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 19:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | I'm thinking that if we give the Management Council the right to decide who a Citizen is (without limiting that power), it may be too easy for them to vote out people like Scientologists without having to change the charter. Then the next thing you know it will be homeopaths, then chiropractors :). I'm suggesting that we only have numbers 2 and 3 as requirements for citizenship. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 19:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
:At this point we should delineate the rights of citizens. No citizen shall have their use of the site blocked or terminated on the basis of their nationality, race, religion, creed, gender, profession, education, residence, age (but see the saving clause wherein we should state that except where barred or limited by local law, the terms of this charter shall be enforced to the greatest degree possible), etc. | |||
:But I do think it important that we assign responsibility to the MC for enrolling new members. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Jones]] 20:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:33, 16 July 2010
I'm thinking that if we give the Management Council the right to decide who a Citizen is (without limiting that power), it may be too easy for them to vote out people like Scientologists without having to change the charter. Then the next thing you know it will be homeopaths, then chiropractors :). I'm suggesting that we only have numbers 2 and 3 as requirements for citizenship. D. Matt Innis 19:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- At this point we should delineate the rights of citizens. No citizen shall have their use of the site blocked or terminated on the basis of their nationality, race, religion, creed, gender, profession, education, residence, age (but see the saving clause wherein we should state that except where barred or limited by local law, the terms of this charter shall be enforced to the greatest degree possible), etc.
- But I do think it important that we assign responsibility to the MC for enrolling new members. Jones 20:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)